I beg leave to call in aid the admirable justification of the discriminating and impartial biographer by my friend Sir Francis Palgrave :-"He is in no wise responsible for the defects of his personages, still less is their vindication obligatory upon him. This conventional etiquette of extenuation mars the utility of historical biography by concealing the compensations so mercifully granted in love, and the admonitions given by vengeance. Why suppress the lesson afforded by the depravity of the 'greatest, brightest, meanest of mankind;' he whose defilements teach us that the most transcendent intellectuality is consistent with the deepest turpitude? The labours of the panegyrists come after all to naught. You are trying to fill a broken cistern. You may cut a hole in the stuff, but you cannot wash out the stain.'
Before concluding I must renew the notice by which I have derived many favours both from strangers and from friends,-"I shall be most grateful to all who will point out omissions to be supplied, or mistakes to be corrected."
I have only further to express my satisfaction in thinking that a heavy weight is now to be removed from my conscience. So essential did I consider an Index to be to every book, that I proposed to bring a Bill into parliament to deprive an author who
* Hist. of Norm. and Eng., b. ii. p. 67.