ERRATA.

Page 160, last line but two of marginal note, instead of "on the day when they ought to have been accepted," read "according to the contract."

193, line 4, instead of " Hen. 5" read " Hen. 4."

210, 211, the counsels' names should be as follows:-Sir W. W. Follett, Bere, and Rowe,

to shew cause: Bompas, Serjt., Erle, and Crowder, in support of the rule. 575, line 11 of marginal note, instead of "buyer" read "seller."

M'Gregor, Davidson v.

Manson, Bray v.

Marston v. Allen

Masterman, Fisk v.

Matthews, Salmon v. -

Memoranda

-

- 625 Pickford v. Grand Junction

571 Railway Co.

Wyld v.

Pike, Gibbs v.

Pitt v. Chappelow

v. Purssord

Pointer, Foster v.

Potter v. Nicholson

Prior v. Hambrow

-

1163

- 269

- 755

- 668 Quick, Shield v.

- 494

- 165

- 827

- 902

- 511

Mitford v. Finden

Mondel v. Steele 300, 641, 858

Morrice v. Langham

Morris, Williams v.

Mountfort, Farmer v.

Muntz v. Sturge

Muschamp v. Lancaster and

Preston Junction Railway

Co.

194

- 488

- 266

302

- 421

- 194

- 264

-

553 Pryme, Foster v.

- 133

Purssord, Pitt v.

Pye, Lockley v.

-

421

- 806

- 711

- 294

- 136

- 677

- 672

- 890

. 244

•

Pritchard, Greenshield v.

Promotions

Richardson v. Jackson

Rickards v. Patterson

Roach v. Wright

Sadler v. Dixon

Salmon v. Matthews

Schild v. Kilpin

Sellman v. Boorn

Senior, Higgins v.

- 234 Shardlow, Earl of Harbo-

rough v.

Sharp v. Key

Shaw, Howard v.

Shelton v. Braithwaite

Shield v. Quick

Slatter v. Painter

Smart v. Hyde

Smith v. Adkins

v. Royston

-

372

443

223

- 616

- 538

- 664

- 294

- 873

- 148

- 895

- 827

- 673

- 552

- 834

-

- 265

- 379

- 118

- 252

- 289

- 672

- 723

- 362

- 381

- 399

147

Sowry, Briggs v.
- 729 Watson, Pechell v.
Spain v. Cadell -
- 129 Webb v. James
Steavenson v. Oliver
234 Webber v. Hutchins
Steele, Mondel v. 300, 641, 858 Welch, Fraser v.
Stewart v. Cauty
Wells v. Foster -
Sturge, Muntz v.
Westbrook, Beeching v.
White, Grand Junction Rail-

- 160
- 302

Swansea (Mayor of) v. Hopkins 901

way Co. v.

Whitmore v. Robertson
Williams, Jones v.

v. Morris

v. Grand Junction

Taylor, Ellis v.
Temperley, Amos v.
Thomas v. Hawkes
Thompson v. Gibson
Thorold, Dixon v.

Todd v. Emly
Turtle, Harris v.

Veale, Fox v.

Waring v. King
Watson v. Fraser

- 415
- 798
- 140

- 281

- 297

- 505

- 258

Railway Co.
Williamson, Gale v.

Willis v. Snook

·

·

Willoughby, Fouldes v.

- 126 Wilmot, Newton v.
Wilson v. Craven

- 571 Wright, Roach v.
660 Wyld v. Pickford

- 691

- 645

- 319

- 628

- 149

411

- 214

- 469

- 349

488

- 856

- 405

- 147

- 540

- 711

- 584

- 155

443