Page images
PDF
EPUB

BISSET ON THE LAW OF PARTNERSHIP, RAILWAY, AND
OTHER JOINT-STOCK COMPANIES.

In 8vo., price 18s. boards,

THE LAW OF PARTNERSHIP; including the Law relating to-1. Ordinary Partnerships. 2. Joint-stock Companies before 7 & 8 Vict. e. 110. 3. Joint-stock Companies within 7 & 8 Vict. c. 110, not requiring the Authority of Parliament. 4. Railway and other Joint-stock Companies requiring the Authority of Parliament, and within 7 & 8 Vict. e. 110, for some Purposes. 5. Banking Companies. By ANDREW BISSET, Esq., of Lincoln's Inn, Barrister at Law.

"We should not have believed, had we not witnessed the success of the experiment, that the Law of Partnership could be thoroughly expounded within the compass of 176 pages, which is the extent of the first part of the work, devoted to the law of ordinary partnerships. . . . . The style, to give it the highest praise that a text-writer can desire, reminds us of 'The Compendium of the Law of Real Property.'"-Jurist, No. 532.

This day is published, in 1 thick Vol. 8vo., price 11. 58. boards,
THE LAW relating to RAILWAYS and RAILWAY
COMPANIES; with all the Cases relating to Compensation, Man-
damus, Injunction, and other Matters decided in the Courts of Law and
Equity; including the Decisions as to the Liabilities of Promoters and
Provisional Committee-men, and on the Rateability of Railways to the
Poor's Rate. Also the Practice in Parliament, Standing Orders, &c.
The Appendix contains all the Statutes, Forms of Notices, Warrants,
Inquisitions, Awards, &c.; with Precedents of Pleadings, Deeds, &c.
By WILLIAM HODGES, Esq., of the Inner Temple, Barrister at Law,
Recorder of Poole.
S. Sweet, 1, Chancery-lane.

LIABILITIES OF PROVISIONAL COMMITTEE-MEN.
This day is published, price 1s. 6d. stitched,

London: Stevens & Norton, and W. Benning & Co., Law Booksellers A CONSIDERATION of the JUDGMENT of the COURT

and Publishers.

A

BISSET ON ESTATES FOR LIFE.
In 8vo., price 13s. boards,

PRACTICAL TREATISE on the LAW of LIFE ES-
TATES. Estates Tail after Possibility of Issue, Curtesy, Dower,
Estates pur auter vie, and their incidents, especially with reference to
the subject of Waste and Merger. By ANDREW BISSET, Esq., of
Lincoln's Inn, Barrister at Law.

**Mr. Bisset has earned a sound, if not an extensive, reputation by his very learned work on Estates for Life, published in 1842."-Jurist, No. 532, March 20, 1847.

Stevens & Norton, Bell-yard, Lincoln's-inn, and 194, Fleet-street.

HINDMARCH ON PATENTS.

This day is published, in 8vo., price 1. 18., boards,

of EXCHEQUER, in the Cases of REYNELL. LEWIS and WILD v. HOPKINS, as to the Liability of Provisional Committee-men with reference to the Joint-stock Companies Act, (7 & 8 Vict. cap. 110); with an Appendix, containing the Judgment of the Court. By a BARRISTER of the Middle Temple.

S. Sweet, 1, Chancery-lane.

This day is published, in one thick Volume, royal 8vo., price 11. 18s. boards,

THE ELEVENTH EDITION of SIR E. B. SUGDEN'S

PRACTICAL TREATISE on the LAW of VENDORS and PURCHASERS of ESTATES.

By adopting a smaller type and adding to the fullness of the pages, this Edition has been very considerably reduced in bulk and price. The intrinsic value of the work has not in any way been affected by the alteration in appearance, as the text remains unabridged, while three indexes.

A TREATISE on the LAW relating to PATENT PRI- the facility of reference is increased by the consolidation of the former

VILEGES for the sole Use of INVENTIONS, and the PRAC

TICE of obtaining LETTERS-PATENT for INVENTIONS; with an
Appendix of Statutes, Rules, Forms, &c. By W. M. HINDMARCH,
Esq., Barrister at Law.

Stevens & Norton, and W. Benning & Co., Law Booksellers and Pub lishers.

A

FINLASON'S LEADING CASES ON PLEADING.

Just published, in royal 8vo., price 128. boards, SELECTION of LEADING CASES on PLEADING, and PARTIES to ACTIONS; with Practical Notes, elucidating the Principles of Pleading, (as exemplified in Cases of most frequent occurrence in Practice), by a reference to the earliest Authorities; and designed to assist both the Practitioner and Student. By W. FINLASON, Esq., of the Middle Temple, Special Pleader.

[ocr errors]

"The Notes themselves are learned, and, we may add, elaborate Treatises upon the matters to which they relate. The frequent reference to the very fountain heads of the Law,-the Year Books and the older Reports,-honourably distinguishes these Notes."-Law Magazine, No. 10, N. S., February, 1847.

Stevens & Norton, Bell-yard, Lincoln's-inn, and 194, Fleet-street.

MITFORD ON PLEADING.-A NEW EDITION.
This day is published, in royal 8vo., price 17. 1s. boards,

S. Sweet, 1, Chancery-lane, London.

Of whom may be had, recently published,
SIR EDWARD SUGDEN'S TREATISE ON POWERS.
In 2 vols. royal 8vo., price 21. in boards,

A PRACTICAL TREATISE on POWERS. By the Right Hon.
Sir EDWARD SUGDEN. The Seventh Edition.

A TREATISE on PRESUMPTIONS of LAW and FACT, with the
Theory and Rules of Presumptive or Circumstantial Proof in Criminal
Cases. By W. M. BEST, Esq., A. M., LL. B., of Gray's Inn, Barrister
at Law. In 8vo., price 15s. boards.
ELLIOTT ON THE QUALIFICATIONS AND REGISTRATION
OF ELECTORS.

In 1 Vol., 12mo., price 148. boards,

A PRACTICAL TREATISE on the QUALIFICATIONS and REGISTRATION of PARLIAMENTARY ELECTORS in ENGLAND and WALES; with an Appendix of Statutes and Forms. The Second Edition, including the Acts for the Trial of Controverted Elections, and for the Registration of Voters, 4 & 5 Vict. c. 58, and 6 Vict. c. 18, with Notes. By GEORGE PERCY ELLIOTT, Esq., of the Middle Temple, Barrister at Law.

A TREATISE on the LAW of EQUITABLE MORTGAGES

A TREATISE on PLEADINGS in SUITS in the containing a Statement of the Law respecting the Liens of Vendors

COURT of CHANCERY by English Bill. By JOHN MIT-
FORD, Esq. (the late LORD REDESDALE). The Fifth Edition,
comprising a Large Body of Additional Notes, by JOSIAH W. SMITH,
B.C.L., of Lincoln's-inn, Barrister at Law.

Stevens & Norton, Bell-yard, Lincoln's-inn, and 194, Fleet-street.
SMITH'S MANUAL OF EQUITY JURISPRUDENCE.
In 12mo., price 8s. boards,

A

MANUAL of EQUITY JURISPRUDENCE, as administered in England, founded on the Commentaries of Joseph Story, LL.D., and comprising, in a small compass, a numerous collection of Points constantly occurring in Chancery and Conveyancing, and in the general practice of a Solicitor. By JÓSIAH W. ŠMITH, B.C.L., of Lincoln's Inn, Barrister at Law.

and Purchasers, of the Rights and Remedies of Equitable Mortgagees by Deposit of Deeds, of the Effect of Notice with regard to Equitable Mortgages, of the Priority of Judgments over Equitable Mortgages, with Observations on the Dictum of Lord Cottenham, and the Judgment of the Vice-Chancellor Wigram, in WHITWORTH V. GAUGAIN, and on the Course of Proceeding on the Bankruptcy of an Equitable Mortgagor; with an Appendix, containing the Judgment of the ViceChancellor Wigram in WHITWORTH V. GAUGAIN, Forms for Equitable Deposits, &c., and an Index. By SAMUEL MILLER, Esq., Barrister at Law. In 8vo., price 108. boards.

"Mr. Miller has stated every case that bears upon the subject, accompanied by very able and judicious remarks; and his work cannot fail to be highly acceptable to the practitioner."-Legal Observer.

“A manual especially adapted to the exigencies of a solicitor's prac-DEEDS for EXECUTION ABROAD.—Messrs. J. & R.

tice."-Jurist, No. 465.

Stevens & Norton, Bell-yard, Lincoln's-inn, and 194, Fleet-street.

FEARNE'S CONTINGENT REMAINDERS.
Tenth Edition, in 2 vols. royal 8vo., price 21. 4s. boards,

M'CRACKEN, Foreign Agents, 7, Old Jewry, beg to inform the
Legal Profession that they undertake to forward Deeds for Execution by
Parties Abroad, through their Correspondents on the Continent, for the
Costs of Transmission and a simple Commission.

List of Correspondents, and for further information, apply as above.
Messrs. J. & R. M'CRACKEN are also Agents to the ROYAL ACA-

N ESSAY on the LEARNING of CONTINGENT DEMY, and devote their attention to the Receipt of Works of Art, BagA

REMAINDERS and EXECUTORY DEVISES, with Butler's Notes. The Tenth Edition. With an Original View of Executory Interests in Real and Personal Property. By JOSIAH W. SMITH, B.C.L., of Lincoln's Inn, Barrister at Law.

Stevens & Norton, and W. Benning & Co., Law Booksellers and Publishers.

SELWYN'S NISI PRIUS.-ELEVENTH EDITION.
In 2 Vols. royal 8vo., price 27. 10s. boards,

AN ABRIDGMENT of the LAW of NISI PRIUS.

Eleventh Edition, enlarged and much improved, with the Statutes and Cases brought down to the present time. By WILLIAM SELWYN, Esq., of Lincoln's Inn, one of her Majesty's Counsel, late Recorder of Portsmouth.

Stevens & Norton, Bell-yard, Lincoln's-inn, and 194, Fleet-street.
HILL ON TRUSTEES.

In royal 8vo., price 11. 68. boards,

gage, &c. sent home by Travellers on the Continent for passing through the Custom-house. They also undertake to ship Goods to all Parts of the World.

ΜΕ

[ETCALFE & CO.'S NEW PATTERN TOOTHBRUSH, and SMYRNA SPONGES.-The Tooth-brush has the important advantages of searching thoroughly into the divisions of the Teeth, and cleaning them in the most effectual and extraordinary manner, and is famous for the hairs not coming loose, ls. An improved Clothes' Brush, that cleans in a third part of the usual time, and incapable of injuring the finest nap. Penetrating Hair Brushes, with the durable unbleached Russian bristles, which do not soften like common hair. Flesh Brushes of improved graduated and powerful friction. Velvet Brushes, which act in the most surprising and successful manner. The genuine SMYRNA SPONGE, with its preserved valuable properties of absorption, vitality, and durability, by means of direct importations, dispensing with all intermediate parties' profits and destructive bleaching, and securing the luxury of a genuine Smyrna Sponge. ONLY at METCALFE & CO.'s, 130 B, Oxford-street, one door from HollesCaution.-Beware of the words "from Metcalfe & Co.'s," adopted by

A PRACTICAL TREATISE on the LAW relating to
TRUSTEES, their Powers, Duties, Privileges, and Liabilities. By
JAMES HILL, Esq., of the Inner Temple, Barrister at Law, and Fel-street.
low of New College, Oxford.

Stevens & Norton, Bell-yard, Lincoln's-inn, and 194, Fleet-street. some houses.

COOTE'S ECCLESIASTICAL PRACTICE.

Just published, in 1 thick vol. 8vo., price 17. 8s. boards,

This day is published, in 8vo., price 6s. boards,

THE PRACTICE of the ECCLESIASTICAL COURTS, DRAFT of an ACT of PARLIAMENT consolidating the

with FORMS and TABLES of COSTS. By HENRY CHARLES COOTE, Proctor in Doctors' Commons, &c.

"The excellent arrangement of the ample materials which he had at command is one of its greatest merits, especially as a work of reference." -Law Magazine.

"This work was much needed, and we think it has been ably executed."-Legal Observer.

"This is a well-timed and well-executed publication. A more acceptable compilation, to country solicitors especially, it is difficult to conceive."-Morning Chronicle.

"Ecclesiastical Practice is now for the first time made the subject of a formal and elaborate Treatise, and it has remained for Mr. Coote, by a combination of industry and experience, to give to the profession a work which has long been wanted, but which so few are competent to supply." -Law Times."

SCRIVEN ON COPYHOLDS.-FOURTH EDITION.

Just published, 2 vols. royal 8vo., price 27. 10s. boards,
A TREATISE on COPYHOLD, CUSTOMARY FREEHOLD, and
ANCIENT DEMESNE TENURE; with the Jurisdiction of Courts
Baron and Courts Leet; also an Appendix, containing Rules for holding
Customary Courts, Courts Baron, and Courts Leet, Forms of Court Rolls,
Deputations, and Copyhold Assurances, and Extracts from the relative
Acts of Parliament. By JOHN SCRIVEN, Serjeant at Law.
Fourth Edition, embracing all the authorities to the present period, by
HENRY STALMAN, Esq., of the Inner Temple, Barrister at Law.
"This Treatise is one of great practical utility, not a little enhanced
by the care, industry, and ability with which the present editor, Mr.
Stalman, has enriched and enlarged the original work."-Law Maga-
zine.

Observer.

The

"Mr. Stalman, the editor of the present edition, has effected considerable improvements by the application of great industry guided by sound judgment."-Law Times.

whole of the STATUTE LAW in ONE ACT, humbly submitted to the consideration of HER MOST GRACIOUS MAJESTY and the TWO HOUSES of PARLIAMENT.

Henry Butterworth, Law Bookseller and Publisher, 7, Fleet-street.
Just published, Part 4, price 17. 18. boards,

CRABB'S DIGEST and INDEX of all the STATUTES.

Also,

Bringing the Statutes and Decisions thereon down to the present
Time. To which is added a copious Index to the Four Volumes."
In 3 Vols. royal 8vo., price 51. 5s. boards,
CRABB'S DIGEST of the STATUTES from Magna Charta to the
end of the Session 1843.

** The Publishers respectfully beg leave to call the attention of the Profession to the fact, that Mr. Crabb's Digest and Index is the only Work that professes to embrace all the Statutes, and that it contains an account of every Statute, more or less copious, according to its prac tical utility. The Value of the whole is materially enhanced by the Index of the Four Volumes, now published.

A. Maxwell & Son, 32, Bell-yard, Lincoln's-inn.

THE LAW OF COSTS.

This day is published, in 12mo., price 48. boards,
THE LAW of COSTS as affected by the SMALL DEBTS
ACT and other Statutes requiring a Judge's Certificate where the
Damages are under a limited Amount, with various Cases, shewing in
what instances a Plaintiff may still sue in the Superior Courts. By
THOMAS HOWARD FELLOWES, of the Inner Temple.
Wm. Benning & Co., Law Booksellers, 43, Fleet-street.
Just ready, price 3s. sewed,

"This is a careful revision of a very valuable standard work."--Legal THOUGHTS on LAW REFORM and on an ARTICLE
in the LAW REVIEW, February, 1847. By JOHN GEORGE
PHILLIMORE.
Wm. Benning & Co., Law Booksellers, 43, Fleet-street.
LAW BOOKS just published by WM. BENNING & CO., Law
Booksellers, 43, Fleet-street.
CHITTY JUN.'S PRECEDENTS IN PLEADING.
EDITION.

SHELFORD ON THE LAW OF RAILWAYS.-SECOND EDITION
1 thick vol. 12mo., price 21s. boards,

THE LAW of RAILWAYS; including the THREE GENERAL CONSOLIDATION ACTS, 1845, and the other General Acts for regu

In royal 8vo., price 27. boards,

SECOND

lating Railways in England and Ireland, with copious Notes of decided PRECEDENTS in PLEADING, with copious Notes on

IN PARLIAMENT RESPECTING RAILWAY BILLS, with Forms, &c. Second Edition, considerably enlarged. By LEONARD SHELFORD, Esq., of the Middle Temple, Barrister at Law.

"This book, like every thing else Mr. Shelford undertakes, is admirably executed, and indispensable to the Profession. The new cases are all carefully noted in their proper places in this new edition.”—Law Magazine.

MR. SERJEANT STEPHEN'S NEW COMMENTARIES.
Complete in 4 vols. 8vo., price 47. 10s. cloth.

NEW COMMENTARIES on the LAWS of ENGLAND, in which are interwoven, under a new and original arrangement of the general subject, all such parts of the work of BLACKSTONE as are applicable to the present times; together with full but compendious expositions.of the modern improvements of the law up to the close of last session; the original and adopted materials being throughout the work typographically distinguished from each other. By HENRY JOHN STEPHEN, Serjeant at Law.

CONTENTS OF THE FIRST VOLUME:-Introduction. Book I. OF
PERSONAL RIGHTS. Book II. OF RIGHTS OF PROPERTY:
Part I. As to Things Real.

CONTENTS OF THE SECOND VOLUME:-Book II. Part I. As to Things
Real (continued). Part II. As to Things Personal. Book III. OF

Pleading, Practice, and Evidence. By the late JOSEPH CHIT-
TY, jun., Esq. The Second Edition, containing References to all the
Cases decided upon the New Rules of Pleading, and Short Preliminary
Observations on the more important Subjects. By HENRY PEAR-
SON, Esq., of the Middle Temple, Barrister at Law.

GRESLEY ON EVIDENCE.-SECOND EDITION.
In royal 8vo., price 11. 8s. boards,

A TREATISE on the LAW of EVIDENCE in the COURTS of
EQUITY. By the late RICHARD NEWCOMBE GRESLEY, Esq.,
M.A., Barrister at Law. Second Edition. With such Alterations and
Additions as to render it conformable to the Statutes, Decisions, and
General Orders, regulating the Law and Practice as to Evidence in the
High Court of Chancery; together with divers further Illustrations, by
reference to the Law and Practice as to Evidence in the Courts of Com-
mon Law and Civil Law. By CHRISTOPHER ALDERSON CAL
VERT, Esq., M.A., Barrister at Law.

CALVERT'S PARTIES TO SUITS.-SECOND EDITION.
In royal 8vo., price 17. Is. boards,
A TREATISE upon the LAW respecting PARTIES to SUITS in
EQUITY. Second Edition By FREDERIC CALVERT, Esq., of the
Inner Temple, Barrister at Law, Fellow of Merton College, Oxford.

RIGHTS IN PRIVATE RELATIONS. Book IV. OF PUBLIC ROBES.-The Very Best Bar Gowns

£2 88. Od.
7 17
2 10

6 0

The Rubert Silk Queen's Counsel Gown
County Court Clerk's Gowns
Every description of Robes on the most moderate terms.
HARRISON,
State Law and Clerical Robe Maker, 21, Brownlow-street, Bedford-row.

RIGHTS.-Part I. Of the Civil Government.
CONTENTS OF THE THIRD VOLUME:-Book IV. Part I. Of the Civil
Government (continued). Part II. Of the Church. Part III. Of the
Social Economy of the Realm. Book V. OF CIVIL INJURIES.
CONTENTS OF THE FOURTH VOLUME:-Book V. OF CIVIL IN-
JURIES (continued). Book VI. OF CRIMES-of the Nature of
Crimes and their Punishments; Of the Rise, Progress, and Gradual BARRISTERS and SOLICITORS requiring GOWNS for

Improvement of the Laws of England. General Index.
"Great expectations had been entertained of the merits of this new
and greater work by the author of what the Law Student of the present
day is accustomed, and justly so, to look up to as almost a perfect work
-the Treatise on the Principles of Pleading; and as far as those expec-
tations were founded on the positive evidence of capacity which the

the NEW COUNTY COURTS can be supplied at a much lower Charge than that usually made for the best description of Goods, on by post, stating height, immediately attended to. application to COX, Robe-maker, 29, Southampton-st., Strand. Orders

800 Volumes of Law Books, 140 Shares in the Law Fire, Legal and General, and Equity and Law Insurance Offices, 186 Dozen of Wines, &c.

smaller one furnished, they have in no way been disappointed."--Law MR. HAMMOND begs to give Notice of the SALE, on

Magazine.

CRABB'S CONCISE PRECEDENTS IN CONVEYANCING. -
THIRD EDITION.

2 thick vols. royal 8vo., price 31. boards.

A COMPLETE SERIES of PRECEDENTS in CONVEYANCING and of COMMON and COMMERCIAL FORMS, in alphabetical order, adapted to the present State of the Law and Practice of Conveyancing, with copious Prefaces, Observations, and Practical Notes on the several Deeds. To which are added the latest Real Property Acts, with Notes, and the Decisions thereon. The Third Edition, revised and greatly enlarged. By GEORGE CRABB, Esq., of the Inner Temple, Barrister at Law.

This Work, which embraces both the Principles and Practice of Conveyancing, contains likewise every description of Instrument wanted for Commercial purposes.

AUCTION, at his great Rooms, No. 28, Chancery-lane, on THURSDAY, May 13th, at 12 o'clock, the various EFFECTS of FOUR PROFESSIONAL GENTLEMEN, including the above Law and other Books, comprising various valuable Reports in the Law and Equity Courts, Statutes, Treatises, and Books of Reference, 65 Shares in the Law Fire, 60 Shares in the Equity and Law, and 15 Shares in the Legal and General Insurance Offices. Choice old Port and Sherry Wines, &c. Particulars to be had at the Estate Agency Offices, 28, Chancery-lane.

Orders for THE JURIST given to any Newsman, or letter (postpaid) sent to the Office, No. 3, CHANCERY LANE, or to STEVENS & NORTON, 26 BELL-YARD, and 194, FLEET-STREET, will insure its punctual delivery in London, or its being forwarded on the evening of publication, through the medium of the Post Office, to the Country.

Printed by LUKE JAMES HANSARD, PRINTER, residing at No. 7,

[ocr errors]

Crabb's Precedents are already well known to the Profession. Two editions have been exhausted in a very short period, a decisive proof of County of Middlesex, at his Printing Office, situate in Parker Sur Pub

estimation in which they are held, and how useful and

they have been found in practice. The Third Edition, just published,

presents a multitude of improvements, giving to it almost the value of a new work."-Law Times.

Henry Butterworth, Law Bookseller and Publisher, 7, Fleet-street.

the Parish of St. Giles-in-the-Fields, in the County aforesaid; and PubWest, in the City of London, by HENRY SWEET, LAW BOOKSELLER and PUBLISHER, residing at No. 11, John Street, Bedford Row, in the

County of Middlesex. Saturday, May 8, 1847.

No. 540-VOL. XI.

MAY 15, 1847.

PRICE 18.

The following are the Names of the Gentlemen who favour THE JURIST with Reports of Cases argued and decided in the several Courts of Law and Equity:

[merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small]

A CASE tried on the 12th instant in the Common Pleas, (Barnes v. Ward), adds another link to the strong chain of evidence on which is founded a general belief that in framing measures of legal reform, Parliament seems always to delight in the omission of something most material. The case was one under the 9 & 10 Vict. c. 93, for compensating the families of persons killed by accidents. The act expressly has in its contemplation the case of death occurring by accident to those whose death leaves unprotected, persons incapable of protecting themselves, and to whom the mere awarding of a gross sum of money is a very questionable benefit. Be it enacted, says the second clause, "That every such action shall be for the benefit of the wife, husband, parent, and child of the person whose death shall have been so caused, and shall be brought by and in the name of the executor or administrator of the person deceased; and in every such action the jury may give such damages as they may think proportioned to the injury resulting from such death to the parties respectively, for whom and for whose benefit such action shall be brought. And the amount so recovered, after deducting the costs not recovered from the defendant, shall be divided amongst the before-mentioned parties in such shares as the jury by their verdict shall find and direct."

[merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors]

sons for whom the act seems principally intended, is that of persons, who, with their families, depend upon labour for support, and to whom, therefore, the loss of an efficient relative is a loss, subjecting the survivors to the danger of poverty. We do not of course mean to say that cases may not arise in classes much above humble life, where the act may apply, but it is obvious that by far the greater number of instances for its application will be found to occur where the parties suing are in humble life. This being so, and the act plainly, by its very wording, contemplating?a compensation for the children of a deceased person, would it not have been thought that provision would have been made for the proper securing and applying such sums for the benefit of children, as a jury should under the act think fit to award? But no; such a precautionary provision is not to be found in the act. The jury may divide the damages between the parties suffering, in such shares as they may think fit; but there is not a word giving to them or to any other authority, any power to regulate the estate to be taken by the sufferers, or the mode in which the damages shall be applied. The damages must be given to the parties entitled, in a gross sum or not at all.

The case of Barnes v. Ward brought out in a marked manner this oversight of the Legislature. The deceased was a charwoman, gaining towards the support of her family from 2s. to 38. per day. The verdict was for the The Legislature must have been well aware in pass- plaintiff, the husband, (subject to leave to move for a ing this, in many respects beneficial act, that it was le- new trial on certain legal objections); and the damages gislating principally for the poor. If a wealthy or even given were-1007. to the husband; 75%. to each of two a tolerably wealthy man receives injury from the un- female children; and 50%. to a boy. Now, it is needlawful carelessness of another, he very rarely in practice less to say, that, even to an adult male in the class of seeks to recover any compensation, unless the case has life of the plaintiff, the sudden possession of 100%. abbeen one of gross and oppressive carelessness, in which solutely, may prove anything but a benefit; but, as to he desires for the good of others less wealthy, to give a the children, what was to be done with their share of wholesome lesson to the wrongdoer. The class of per-damages? The jury in the case referred to, expressed a

[blocks in formation]

very proper and prudent desire that the money award-paid, and if there be nothing in the act to convert the

ed to the children should be secured for them; to which the Court answered, that "it would consider how that could be done. That the act did not provide any means for that, in which it was defective."

We apprehend it will take a very great deal of consideration, to see how that which the jury desired, can be done. The money awarded by a verdict under this statute becomes immediately, we apprehend, the absolute property of the parties, whether they are infants or not. The question will be, "To whom ought the money to be paid?" The only hand approaching the character of a legal hand to receive it, would be that of the guardian; but even he is not, we apprehend, competent to discharge the party paying. In the case of a legacy, it is clear that payment by the executors to the guardian of an infant legatee, is not good payment to the infant; neither is payment to the infant himself. In the case of legacies to infants, it is true, an executor may discharge himself by paying the legacy into the Court of Chancery, under the 36 Geo. 3, c. 52; but that act appears entirely confined to the cases where the infant claims by will or by inheritance, and not to apply to any case such as that under consideration, where the infant's title arises by an act inter vivos, constituting the infant a sort of judgment creditor of the defendant. We confess we see no legal power in any person to give a discharge to the party condemned to pay the damages; and the result, if we are right, will be, either that the defendant in such a case is not bound to pay at all till the infants attain their majorities, or else that the action at law must be followed by a suit in equity to secure the infant's property. Of course the costs of the suit would be borne by the fund, as the defendant at law has done all that he is bound to do, when he stands ready to pay the money to whoever is competent legally to discharge him. And of course, also, we need not observe that the expense of getting 2007. into court in trust for three infants, and getting maintenance for them during their minorities, and getting the balance out for them respectively as they attain their respective majorities, would make a trifling inroad upon the principal sum. Thus the Legislature has, by this careless omission, defeated a very material part of its beneficent

purpose.

But another and perhaps more important question remains behind, viz. whether the jury has, under the 9 & 10 Vict. c. 93, any power to give damages to infants. It is quite plain, that the act of Victoria never intended to condemn a defendant to be, perhaps for a whole minority, liable to hold a fund in trust for the parties entitled to the damages. The defendant is simply to be liable to an action for damages, and the jury may give damages, and the damages are to be divided in such shares as the jury shall find. (Sects. 1 and 2). If the defendant is bound to hold the damages, and to be liable to pay them at the termination of the minority, he would be, in fact, a trustee. Now, no one ever heard of a verdict for damages creating a continuing trust at common law, and the 9 & 10 Vict. c. 93, does not contain one word shewing an intention to create such a trust. If, then, there is no person to whom damages awarded to an infant can be legally

defendant into a trustee, what is the result? That the defendant cannot pay the damages to anybody, and is not bound to hold them. Did, therefore, the act intend to give power to a jury to direct damages to be paid, where there is no one competent to give a discharge? It may be argued with no small plausibility, that the Legislature did not so intend; and, consequently, that, under the act in question, damages cannot be given to infants. It is much to be regretted, that the act did not give power to the jury to direct the mode in which the recipients of the damages should enjoy them, and to order them to be paid into some official hand upon the trusts directed.

OBSERVATIONS ON THE DOCTRINE OF INSANITY, AS APPLIED TO THE CAPACITY TO MAKE A WILL.

(Concluded from p. 147).

It will be found, moreover, upon looking at the authorities, that the notion of moral insanity is not quite unknown to the law; in this sense, that the Courts, in cases where there was proof of general insanity, and an allegation of a will made during a lucid interval, have looked into the will to see whether its dispositions were consistent with the dictates of the natural affections of the testator, or the contrary, and have used the inferences arising from such dispositions, as evidence of the existence or non-existence of a lucid interval. Thus, in Cartwright v. Cartwright, (1 Phil. 90), the will of å woman who was admitted to be generally insane, anp of whom the witnesses deposed, that, while writing her will, her behaviour was that of an insane person, was, nevertheless, upheld; and the circumstance, that it was a proper and natural will, appears to have been not without weight. So, in a case cited by Lord Eldon in M'Adam v. Walker, (1 Dow, 178); while, on the contrary, in Clark v. Lear and Scarwell, (cîted 1 Phil. 119), where a will was made by an insane person, such will, although orderly and regularly made, yet, not being a natural one, that is, being made in favour of a person whom the testator had no cause to benefit, was not held to furnish proof of a lucid interval. These has looked at rectitude or perversion of the moral feelcases certainly shew, that, to some extent, the Court ings, as affording indications of sanity or insanity. viz. what are the grounds on which a judicial opinion We now proceed to another branch of the question, can be formed as to the state of mind of a testator. We conceive, that the question, what constitutes insanity, is not a question of law, but of fact. If we turn to the older cases, in which the doctrine of insanity has been discussed, the very authorities on which the Court relied in Freer v. Peacock, we find, that, in those cases, forming its conclusion as to what constitutes insanity, the Court treats the question as one of fact, and, in relies very much upon the evidence of persons of medical science. In the great case of Dew v. Clark, Sir J. Nicholl uses this language:-"As far as my own observation and experience can direct me, aided by opinions and statements I have heard expressed in soother courts of justice, or has been laid down by medical ciety, guided also by what has occurred in these and in and legal writers, the true criterion is, where there is

cause it found that science then adopted that, and no other, as the test. But the principle of Dew v. Clark was, to treat insanity or no insanity, as a question of fact, and to ascertain from evidence what then was understood to constitute insanity. If then since Dew v. Clark another test of insanity has been discovered, we apprehend, that, consistently with authority and consistently with common sense, the law must adopt the new test as well as the old one, as a fact; and the conclusion is, that, in Freer v. Peacock, the decision is either wrong, or, if right, is put upon wrong grounds. If the new doctrine is true as a matter of science; if there is in fact a moral insanity; and if in fact such insanity draws after it the consequences attendant upon exercise of volition as applied to those qualities of the mind requisite for making a will, then of course the decision is wrong, as being a verdict against evidence. If the new doctrine is not sufficiently supported by facts and reasoning, to be relied on as a statement of a fact, then we say, with great deference, the decision is put upon wrong grounds, because it is put upon the ground that whatever may be the medical doctrine, the law knows no insanity unaccompanied by intellectual delusion; whereas it ought to have been put upon the ground that the evidence of the fact of insanity was insufficient. The distinction is very material, because, if the Court is right on the ground on which it has put the decision in Freer v. Peacock, no amount of belief in mankind generally in the existence of moral insanity, no amount of evidence of its existence, or of its consequences upon the exercise of the faculties of the mind, can ever justify a different decision.

delusion of mind, there is insanity, &c. Medical writers have laid down the same criterion by which insanity may be known." And then his Honor goes on to quote Dr. Battie, Mr. Locke, and Dr. Willis, to shew what are the ingredients and tests of insanity. So that, after all, the Court founded its notion of the legal definition of insanity, on conclusions drawn from the statements or opinions of medical and metaphysical writers on the question of fact, what is insanity. When, therefore, in Freer v. Peacock, the Court treats it as settled that there can be no insanity in the eye of the law except where there is intellectual delusion, as distinguished from moral perversion,-when it treats this as settled law upon the ground that there has been "no case decided in a court of law where moral perver-intellectual delusion, viz. an incapacity for the healthy sion of the feelings, unaccompanied with delusion, has been held a sufficient ground to invalidate and nullify the acts of one so affected," -we conceive, with very great submission, that the Court is not putting the law on its true grounds; that it is attributing to the law the adoption, as of its own authority, of some standard by which to define what shall be held insanity, instead of attributing to it the course which it really has pursued, that of adopting conclusions drawn from the existing state of scientific knowledge, as to what is in fact insanity. Of course insanity must have been always the same; that is to say, the same state of mind cannot have been in one age diseased and in another healthy; but it is perfectly possible, and, indeed, it is the fact, that that which, from the imperfect state of science, has at one time not been known to be a diseased state of the mind, has at a subsequent period been discovered to be so. It is well known, for instance, that, in the middle ages, many pursuits were held to be indicative of insanity which are now known to be perfectly consistent with health of the mind; and vice versâ, certain states of mind, particularly those marked by great religious exaltation, were considered to be the result of inspirations from Heaven, or at least the manifestations of superior holiness, which would now be recognised as proceeding simply from disease of the brain. Applying this to a period nearer to our own, we find that the scientific investigators of mental disease, until lately, did not entertain the idea that there could be a morbid state of the mind unaccompanied by intellectual delusion; hence they stated as a fact that the test of insanity was intellectual delusion. In the progress of science it has been discovered, or at least some men of no trivial scientific reputation have believed they have discovered, that there is another form of mental disease, affecting, not the understanding, but the feelings. They have termed such disease moral insanity, and they have argued and produced facts to shew that such a state of mind is morbid; that is, amounts to mental disease or insanity, although there may be no illusion or belief of any unreal and imaginary facts. Now it may be that these men are wrong in their scientific conclusions. It may be, that they are wrong in stating, as a fact, that a perverted state of the feelings is the result of disease of the mind; and it may be, that if it is the result of disease of the mind, still such a disease is not incompatible with the possession and exercise, with full volition, of those faculties of the mind which are requisite to make a will. But all these considerations are, we conceive, questions of scientific fact, in which a court of law cannot lay down any positive definition of its own authority, but must rely, as it does, in respect to all other matters of science, on the testimony of witnesses who from their study of the subject are best qualified to form an opinion.

The conclusion is, that there is no rule of law which makes it necessary to adopt as the only test of insanity, intellectual delusion. The law has, down to the case of Dew v. Clark, adopted that as the test of insanity, be

The third and last branch of the inquiry to which we shall very shortly address ourselves is, whether the true question to be solved in cases of this kind is not, whether the mental disease of the testator, by whatever name it may be designated, and whatever may be its special manifestations, be not such as to afford a strong inference against his capacity to apply his faculties to the making of a will; whether, in fact, a will made by a person labouring under such mental disease, can be taken to express the intentions which the testator would have had, if he had been wholly sane. And if the answer be in the negative, then it follows that the proof of the existence of such mental disease in the testator, ought to avoid his will. Now, it should be recollected, that, in the matter of making of a will, the two classes of mental faculties, the existence of which is not denied, viz. the intellectual and moral faculties, are both necessarily called into action. The recollection of what property the testator has, and the arrangements appertaining to its disposition, come within the functions of the understanding. But the selection of the recipients of the testator's bounty, is altogether within the domain of the moral faculties, or, what are in common language termed, the feelings. These are the mental instruments with which the testator must make his calculations of the relative claims to his bounty, of all those of whose existence and claims he has knowledge; and when it is admitted that a testator's moral feelings are perverted, or that he is wholly or partially without any such feelings, it is admitted, in fact, that he is without, or has only in a perverted and distorted state, some of the mental qualities which are essential to impressing upon a will all the marks of a whole and sane mind. What is the necessary inference? That the will of such a person ought not to be taken to be the offspring of a whole and sane mind.

C. S. D.

MASTER IN CHANCERY.-The Lord Chancellor has appointed John Hemmant, Gent., of Whittlesey, Cambridge, to be a Master Extraordinary in the high Court of Chancery.

« EelmineJätka »