The Law Times, 236. köideOffice of The Law times, 1965 |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 83
Page 236-245
... bank put on inquiry by form of cheques— Whether bank liable for failure of tellers to notice discrepancies in paying - in book between total cash figures in box in top slip and in box in carbon receipt . 66 APPEAL from the Full Court of ...
... bank put on inquiry by form of cheques— Whether bank liable for failure of tellers to notice discrepancies in paying - in book between total cash figures in box in top slip and in box in carbon receipt . 66 APPEAL from the Full Court of ...
Page 236-259
... bank returned it to Mr. Tilley so that he could sue the drawer upon it . Mr. Tilley commenced the action , but it was eventually dismissed for want of prosecution . The bank then requested Mr. Tilley to return the cheque ( which he did ) ...
... bank returned it to Mr. Tilley so that he could sue the drawer upon it . Mr. Tilley commenced the action , but it was eventually dismissed for want of prosecution . The bank then requested Mr. Tilley to return the cheque ( which he did ) ...
Page 236-260
... bank had put a note on the paying - in slip expressly to prevent any such agreement being implied . This note read : The bank reserves the right , at its discretion , to postpone payment of cheques drawn against uncleared effects which ...
... bank had put a note on the paying - in slip expressly to prevent any such agreement being implied . This note read : The bank reserves the right , at its discretion , to postpone payment of cheques drawn against uncleared effects which ...
Contents
Vol 236 | 236-30 |
Practice and Procedure | 236-31 |
Queens Counsel | 236-41 |
49 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
action Advertisements agreement allowed Amendment Appeal application appointed authority bank Bill building charge claim clause Commissioners Commons considered contract costs Council Counsel course court Court of Appeal Criminal death decision defendant documents duty edit effect entitled evidence exercise fact February further give given Government granted ground held House husband income interest issue January JUDGE justices L. T. Jour land Limited London Lord March matter Minister Notes notice Office operation Order in Council owners paid parties payment period person plaintiffs planning practice premises present Price proceedings purchase question reason received reference regard registered Regulations relating Reported respect respondent Restrictive Road rules schedule sect shares Society Solicitors statutory taken taxpayer tenant tion trade trial trust wife