United States Reports: Cases Adjudged in the Supreme Court, 97. köideU.S. Government Printing Office, 1879 |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 100
Page 15
... . Barrow , 17 How . 130 ; Coal Company v . Blatchford , 11 Wall . 172 ; Knapp v . Railroad Company , 20 id . 117 ; Case of the Sewing - Machine Companies , 18 id . 553 ; Williams et al . v Oct. 1877. ] 15 HOTEL Co. v . WADE .
... . Barrow , 17 How . 130 ; Coal Company v . Blatchford , 11 Wall . 172 ; Knapp v . Railroad Company , 20 id . 117 ; Case of the Sewing - Machine Companies , 18 id . 553 ; Williams et al . v Oct. 1877. ] 15 HOTEL Co. v . WADE .
Page 21
... Wall . 425 . Examples of the kind are put by Judge Story , in his work on Equity Pleading . Speaking of a bill brought by one of several residuary legatees for a final settlement and distribu- tion of the estate of a testator or ...
... Wall . 425 . Examples of the kind are put by Judge Story , in his work on Equity Pleading . Speaking of a bill brought by one of several residuary legatees for a final settlement and distribu- tion of the estate of a testator or ...
Page 25
... Wall . 129 ) , that , as a measure of police regulation , a State law prohibit- ing the manufacture and sale of intoxicating liquors is not repugnant to any clause of that Constitution . 6. It appearing from the record that the point ...
... Wall . 129 ) , that , as a measure of police regulation , a State law prohibit- ing the manufacture and sale of intoxicating liquors is not repugnant to any clause of that Constitution . 6. It appearing from the record that the point ...
Page 27
... Wall . 51 ; Wales v . Sutton , 2 Mass . 143 ; Boston & Lowell Railroad v . Salem & Lowell Railroad , 2 Gray ( Mass . ) , 1 ; Piscataqua Bridge v . New Hampshire Bridge , 7 N. H. 35 ; Thorpe v . Burlington & Rutland Rail- road , 27 Vt ...
... Wall . 51 ; Wales v . Sutton , 2 Mass . 143 ; Boston & Lowell Railroad v . Salem & Lowell Railroad , 2 Gray ( Mass . ) , 1 ; Piscataqua Bridge v . New Hampshire Bridge , 7 N. H. 35 ; Thorpe v . Burlington & Rutland Rail- road , 27 Vt ...
Page 28
... Wall . 636 . The act of 1869 does not impair the obligation of a contract , inasmuch as the charter of the company , being subject to the reservation of the act of 1869 , is amendable and repealable . The State may , therefore , in the ...
... Wall . 636 . The act of 1869 does not impair the obligation of a contract , inasmuch as the charter of the company , being subject to the reservation of the act of 1869 , is amendable and repealable . The State may , therefore , in the ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
act of March action affirmed Alexander Collie alleged Allen Jones amount appears assessments assignment authority bank Bates County bill bonds cents Chaboya charge charter Circuit Court claim claimant collector complainants Confederate Constitution contract corporation cotton court of equity court-martial declared decree deed defendant delivered the opinion demurrer District duty entitled equity evidence exemption fact filed grant held Insurance interest invention issued judgment jurisdiction jury JUSTICE Kansas Pacific Railway lands legislature letters-patent levy liable manufactured March 18 ment Missouri mortgage North Carolina offence officer owner paid parties patent pavement payment person plaintiff in error plea premises proceedings provisions purchase purpose question Railroad Company rebellion received record repealed road rule sect seizure smoking-tobacco sold Stat statute steam-tug suit Supreme Court taxation Tennessee thereof tion tobacco trust United valid valve void Wall writ of error
Popular passages
Page 27 - the power vested in the legislature by the Constitution to make, ordain, and establish all manner of wholesome and reasonable laws, statutes, and ordinances, either with penalties or without, not repugnant to the Constitution, as they shall judge to be for the good and welfare of the Commonwealth and the subjects of the same,
Page 604 - where any title, right, privilege, or immunity is claimed under the Constitution, or any treaty or statute of, or commission held or authority exercised under, the United States, and the decision is against the title, right, privilege, or immunity specially set up or claimed by either party under such Constitution, treaty, statute, commission, or authority,
Page 604 - where is drawn in question the validity of a statute of, or an authority exercised under, any State, on the ground of their being repugnant to the Constitution, treaties, or laws of the United States, and the decision is in favor of their validity;
Page 474 - Under the fourth article of the Constitution, it rests with Congress to decide what government is the established one in a State. For as the United States guarantee to each State a republican government, Congress must necessarily decide what government is established in the State, before it can determine whether it is republican or not.
Page 356 - is not in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art or science to which it appertains to make, construct, compound, or use the same
Page 701 - No corporation shall be created, or its powers increased or diminished, by special laws; but the General Assembly shall provide by general laws for the organization of all corporations hereafter created, which laws may, at any time, be altered or repealed; and no such alteration or repeal shall interfere with or divest rights which have become vested.
Page 154 - a violation of the Constitution of the State, which declares that " corporations may be formed under general laws, but shall not be created by special act, except for municipal purposes.
Page 165 - Now, therefore, be it known that I, Andrew Johnson, President of the United States, do hereby declare that all restrictions upon internal, domestic, and coastwise intercourse and trade, and upon the removal of products of States heretofore declared in insurrection, . . . heretofore imposed in the territory of the United States
Page 334 - authenticated, shall have such faith and credit given them in every court within the United States as they have by law or usage in the courts of the State from whence they are taken.
Page 19 - those courts shall have original cognizance, concurrent •with the courts of the several States, of all suits of a civil nature, at common law or in equity, where the matter in dispute exceeds the sum or value of $500, and