The Law Times, 215. köideOffice of The Law Times, 1953 |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 59
Page 215-3
... shares which had no par value - a practice which was impossible in this country having regard to the pro- visions of sects . 2 ( 4 ) and 21 of the Companies Act , 1929 . It was suggested to the committee that shares of no par value ...
... shares which had no par value - a practice which was impossible in this country having regard to the pro- visions of sects . 2 ( 4 ) and 21 of the Companies Act , 1929 . It was suggested to the committee that shares of no par value ...
Page 215-9
... shares fell short of the sums which ought to have been paid , the earliest payment which was to be regarded as deficient was that made on 31st October , 1939 . Matthews v . Great Northern Railway Company ( 32 L. T. Rep . ( O. S. ) 355 ...
... shares fell short of the sums which ought to have been paid , the earliest payment which was to be regarded as deficient was that made on 31st October , 1939 . Matthews v . Great Northern Railway Company ( 32 L. T. Rep . ( O. S. ) 355 ...
Page 215-299
... shares was prima facie exhaustive so that they could not , as had been thought to be the case , share in surplus assets on a winding - up . 66 In this article the writer is not concerned with reduction of capital or with winding up ...
... shares was prima facie exhaustive so that they could not , as had been thought to be the case , share in surplus assets on a winding - up . 66 In this article the writer is not concerned with reduction of capital or with winding up ...
Contents
Vol 215 | 215-16 |
Friday January 9 1953 | 215-41 |
COMMENTS ON CASES | 215-43 |
Copyright | |
32 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
action ADVERTISEMENTS agents allowed amended amount Appeal applied appointed April authority Barrister-at-Law Bill Buildings cause charge claim committee common Company considered contract costs Council Counsel court Court of Appeal damages death decision defendants duty effect England entitled evidence fact February fund further give given Government ground held House husband important income interest issue January JUDGE judgment jurisdiction justices L. T. Jour L. T. Rep land liability Limited London Lord March March 27 matter meaning Minister notice Office operation Order in Council owner paid parties payment person plaintiff practice premises present Price proceedings question reason received recent referred regard Regulations relating rent Reported respect result Rules scheme sect Society Solicitors statutory tenant trust wife