regulations as to dealers in marine stores, 990, 991.
penalties under act, how to be levied, 991.

inhabitants competent witnesses, 991.

lord warden and his deputies, &c. to have like power

as justices, 991.
manner of issuing commissions for punishment of offences,
agreeably to 28 H. 8. c. 15., 991, 992.
reservation of rights of Admiralty, Trinity-house, &c.

boundaries of jurisdiction of Cinque Ports, 992.
adjustment of salvage under 13 Ann. c. 18., 993.

7 & 8 G. 4. c. 29., 994, 995.

992.

plundering any part of the tackle or cargo of a ship-
wrecked vessel, capital felony, 994, 995.

persons in possession of shipwrecked goods not giving a
satisfactory account, 995.
persons offering shipwrecked goods for sale, 995.

7 & 8 G. 4. c. 30., 995.

exhibiting false signals to a ship, or destroying a ship-
wrecked vessel or cargo, capital felony, 995.

9 G. 4. c. 31., 996.

assaults on officers endeavouring to save shipwrecked
property, 996. See also 54.
form of Order and Award for wreck, pursuant to 1 & 2 G. 4.

c. 75., 996.

of bail upon appeal against award of salvage, 994.
as to the burial of dead bodies cast ashore, see General Index,

Burial.

END OF THE THIRD VOLUME.

LONDON:

Printed by A. SPOTTISWOODE,
New-Street-Square.

ERRATA ET CORRIGENDA.

VOL. III.

Page 435. line 11. from bottom, for "R. v. Macklow" read "R. v. Mucklow." 508. line 2. for “7 & 8 G. 4. c. 64. § 12." read “7 G. 4.”

1007. line 1. for "In a case of forgery" read "In a case not strictly of forgery, but a crime of an analogous description."

Ibid. line 16. from the bottom, after "were bad" subjoin the following note: "The decision of the judges was, that these counts were bad on account of the imperfection of the translation as above objected. A majority of the judges also thought them bad because fac similes of the notes were sewed with thread to the indictment; but they came to no regular decision upon that point."

1008. at the bottom, subjoin "With reference to the point that after verdict an indictment shall be sufficient under 7 G. 4. c. 64. § 21. if it describe the offence in the words of the stat., it having been noticed that in the above cases the objections were taken during the trial, and before any verdict was given, it was held that if an offence created by stat. be described in the indictment in the words of the stat., and the description be such as would not be sufficient according to the general rules applicable to indictments, the prisoner may demur to the indictment, but, unless he demurs, he cannot, after issue is joined on the plea of not guilty, and the trial has begun, take any objection as to the legal description of the offence in the indictment, if it be described in the words of the stat.; and if such an objection be taken, the judge ought not to allow it, for that is in the nature of an objection taken in arrest of judgment, which, if the indictment be for an offence created by stat., and in the words of the stat., cannot be taken under the circumstances stated in the latter part of the 21st section of 7 G. 4. c. 64."