The Law Times, 233. köideOffice of The Law Times, 1962 |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 62
Page 31
... referred to , as The Wagon Mound , has twice been referred to in the editorial columns of The Law Times ( Vol . 231 p . 44 ; Vol . 232 p . 296 ) . On the second occasion mention was also made of Smith v . Leech Brain and Company Limited ...
... referred to , as The Wagon Mound , has twice been referred to in the editorial columns of The Law Times ( Vol . 231 p . 44 ; Vol . 232 p . 296 ) . On the second occasion mention was also made of Smith v . Leech Brain and Company Limited ...
Page 33
... referred only to part of the land ; but that would lead to an absurdity . The whole position , his lordship said , would be nonsense unless the permission of 1953 superseded that of 1950 and referred to the whole of the land . Whilst ...
... referred only to part of the land ; but that would lead to an absurdity . The whole position , his lordship said , would be nonsense unless the permission of 1953 superseded that of 1950 and referred to the whole of the land . Whilst ...
Page 218
... ( referred to as C corporation ) which , up to July 1956 , was engaged in the manufacture and sale of roofing materials and gypsum and paper products . In 1956 C corporation hived off the assets representing its gypsum and paper interests ...
... ( referred to as C corporation ) which , up to July 1956 , was engaged in the manufacture and sale of roofing materials and gypsum and paper products . In 1956 C corporation hived off the assets representing its gypsum and paper interests ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
action ADVERTISEMENTS agreement allowed Amendment application appointed authority BILL Board building carried cause charge claim clause common Company condition considered contract Council Counsel County course Court of Appeal Criminal damages decision defendant duty edit effect England entitled evidence fact February give given Government granted ground held House House of Lords husband income interest issue January JUDGE judgment June jurisdiction justices L. T. Jour land landlord Limited London Lord March marriage matter meaning ment Minister Miss notice offence Office operation Order in Council paid parties payment period person plaintiff planning possession practice premises present Price published purchaser question reason received referred regard registered Regulations relating Reported respect respondent Road rule sect Society Solicitors statutory tenant tion trade trust wife