Henery v. Henery, 159 Henfree v. Bromley, 65, 174 Hicks v. Richardson, 66, 183 v. Townsend, 132, 136 v. Hickman, 138, 163 Huddersfield Corporation v. Jacomb, 122 Humphrey v. Pearce, 58 LAMBERT v. Hutchinson, 167 v. Lingard, 136 v. Lewis, 136, 151, 176 Lock v. Vulliamy, 173 Rose v. Redfern, 172 Russell v. Russell, 22, 157 S. SACKETT v. Owen, 158, 182 Salkeld v. Slater, 49 Scales v. East London Waterworks Co., 119 Scott v. Avery, 155 v. Van Sandau, 175 Simmonds v. Swaine, 59, 73, 176 Sinclair v. Gt. Eastern Ry. Co., 98 Smith v. Corp. of Liverpool, 155 v. Muller, 26 v. Troup, 20 v. Whitmore, 121 Smurthwaite v. Richardson, 27 Snook v. Hellyer, 124 Soilleux v. Herbst, 149 Spain v. Cadell, 174 Spartali v. Van Hoorn, 157 THE subject of Arbitration is not only a subject of Introduction. great interest to commercial men, but one also of increasing importance to the commercial world. The interest taken in it has been, of late years, more especially shown by the establishment in various parts of the country, of courts of arbitration for the purpose of settling disputes amongst members of the different trades and occupations carried on in our midst, the object being to avoid, as far as possible, that direct appeal to the law which so frequently ends in delay, dissatisfaction, and expense. Under these circumstances, it is thought desirable to put in a concise and readable form, the principal features of this subject, so as to enable all the parties to an arbitration to form some idea of the duties and responsibilities of their position, as well as the advantages they B |