LAMBERT v. Hutchinson, 167 v. Lingard, 136 Leggo v. Young, 173, 188 Leicester v. Grazebrook, 110 Lewin v. Holbrook, 158, 171 Lewis v. Rossiter, 175, 176 Lievesley v. Gilmore, 182 Lingood v. Eade, 43, 60, 182 Little v. Newton, 170 Livingston v. Ralli, 156 Lloyd v. Harris, 131, 185 v. Lewis, 136, 151, 176 Lock v. Vulliamy, 173 Marshall & Dresser, 82 Morphett, 61, 103, 166 Newton and Hetherington, 119 Pering, 170 Plews, 163, 175 Renshaw & Falk, 155 Rouse, 142 Salkeld, 170 Skeete, 127, 184 Smith & Reece, 173 Story, 159 Tidswell, 112 Walker, 125 Wiggleston Hospital, 179 Read v. Hulton, 170 Rees v. Waters, 174, 175 STOLEN JOHN A. GORMLEY. Regina or Rex v. Bardell, 159, 172 v. Blakemore, 148 v. Calvert, 185 v. Fontainemoreau,181 v. Great Western Ry. Co., 124 v. Hardy, 148, 149 v. Hemsworth, 186 v. Hill, 20 v. Maffey, 183 126, v. South Devon Ry. Co., 172 Reynolds v. Gray, 163 v. Harris, 85, 98 Rhodes v. Airedale Drainage Commis sioners, 147, 168 Richardson v. Kensitt, 98 v. Worsley, 86, 94, 188 Richmond v. Parkinson, 131 Roberts v. Eberhardt, 81, 87, 172, 174 v. Evans, 173 Robertson v. Hutton, 128 Rodney v. Chambers, 22 Rooney v. Whiteley, 142, 165 S. SACKETT v. Owen, 158, 182 Salkeld v. Slater, 49 Scales v. East London Waterworks Scott v. Avery, 155 v. Van Sandau, 175 Simmonds v. Swaine, 59, 73, 176 Sinclair v. Gt. Eastern Ry. Co., 98 Smith v. Corp. of Liverpool, 155 v. Muller, 26 v. Troup, 20 v. Whitmore, 121 Smurthwaite v. Richardson, 27 Soilleux v. Herbst, 149 Solomon v. Solomon, 57, 119 Spartali v. Van Hoorn, 157 THE subject of Arbitration is not only a subject of Introduction. great interest to commercial men, but one also of increasing importance to the commercial world. The interest taken in it has been, of late years, more especially shown by the establishment in various parts of the country, of courts of arbitration for the purpose of settling disputes amongst members of the different trades and occupations carried on in our midst, the object being to avoid, as far as possible, that direct appeal to the law which so frequently ends in delay, dissatisfaction, and expense. Under these circumstances, it is thought desirable to put in a concise and readable form, the principal features of this subject, so as to enable all the parties to an arbitration to form some idea of the duties and responsibilities of their position, as well as the advantages they B |
0 Reviews Arvustused pole kinnitatud, aga Google kontrollib neid võltssisu suhtes ja eemaldab selle. Write review |