Page images
PDF
EPUB

The reader will have no difficulty in following out the rules with regard to the signs of the correction in each particular case, but it will be much safer and quite accurate enough to take the value of Pk from the figure and to multiply it by tan. 8 for the correction. As a practical direction we have found this convenient. Join Pp, and produce it both ways. Then according to this figure, the correction is additive to the hour circle reading for all stars having north declination which are observed on the south side of Pp produced, and vice versa for stars on the north side. The tangent of declination is negative when the star is south of the equinoctial, and the rule is reversed. There is no correction for stars in the direction of Pp, that is for stars having an east hour angle from the south or a west hour angle from the north, such that its tangent. After this correction has been applied, the index error of the hour circle may be deduced in the manner pointed out.

y

It sometimes happens that an observer, from carelessness or want of time or knowledge, does not determine the position of the pole of the instrument by the best means, viz., by observations in the meridian and at six hours from it, but that this position is to be deduced from a higgledy piggledy mass of observations made in different parts of the heavens. To form equations such as we have just given for each observation, and to solve them by the method of minimum squares, might possibly be the most accurate mode; but the labour would be very great, and on such an object very much misspent. We have found the graphical process quite sufficient, and it has the further advantage of exhibiting to the eye those observations which, from their extravagance, are probably errors in bisecting the star or in reading off the verniers. Suppose such a set of observations to be given for reduction. Draw w E and N z, at right angles to each

W

=

[blocks in formation]

other, and intersecting at P, and then draw from P lines such as PS, PS for each known star observed, making the angles SPZ, S'PZ equal to the observed hour angles of the stars. If the instrumental polar distance be less than that of the catalogue, as in s', take p h' = the difference; if the instrumental distance be greater, as in s, prolong SP and take Ph the difference. Through hand h' draw perpendiculars to PS and PS', and these will intersect at p, the place of the instrumental pole. Repeating this process for each known star, the eye will show pretty nearly where p should be chosen among the various intersections. The place of p being determined, the observations of an unknown star or comet may be corrected as shown above; and by dropping perpendiculars on PW and PN, the azimuthal and vertical errors of the pole of the instrument may be determined.

It seems scarcely necessary to caution any person into whose hands such observations may come, against relying upon intersections which are made at very acute or very obtuse angles. If, for instance, we were to attempt to deduce the place of p as to azimuth by a pair of observations near the meridian, or its place as to altitude by observations near the 6 hour meridian, we should only have our own folly to blame for the inaccuracy of the result. From the nature of the case, the unavoidable errors of observation would be multiplied by the process, and a result of any kind might be obtained, just as by observing the sun near noon for time and near the prime vertical for latitude, a sailor might cause his sextant to be guilty of any assignable error. This is evident from the form of the analytical equation, but any nonalgebraist may satisfy himself by drawing lines PS and Ps', making an angle of 5 or 10°, and by finding what the effect of an error of 10" in the observations will be on the position of p. If three observations of stars without reversion should be employed, and the index error of the

declination circle be deduced at the same time, the blunder will be complete.

Though the errors of an unadjusted equatorial may be detected and the corrections rigorously computed, it would be an abuse of time and calculation to do so. In two of the ordinary constructions of the instrument and probably in the third, the instrumental errors are not and cannot be expected to be accurately the same in all positions of the instrument. In those equatorials of Ramsden's construction which have five feet telescopes and declination circles of three feet diameter, variations of adjustment between the meridian and six hours from it may be expected to amount to 10" or 20", and in the largest equatorials, which are necessarily more imperfect, discrepancies of 1 or even 2' may arise. We shall now point out the rational mode of using an equatorial instrument, when the object is to determine the place of any phenomenon in the heavens.

The first thing is to adjust the instrument with great care, and especially to make the pole of the instrument agree with the celestial pole. The permanence of this adjustment depends solely upon the steadiness of the upper and lower supports, which should therefore be fixed very solidly. This being done, suppose a comet is to be determined. Turn the telescope upon it, and having clamped the hour circle very firmly, note the transit of the comet over the vertical wires, bisecting it at the same time in N.P.D. by the horizontal wire. Wait till some other star passes over the field, note its transit, and bisect it in N.P.D. by moving the micrometer screw only. In this case the declination circle is supposed to be firmly clamped between the observations. Then the difference of the times of observation gives the difference of R.A. between the comet and star, and the difference in declination is taken from the micrometer. It is the same thing, of course, whether the star precedes or succeeds the comet. Observations of this kind are amongst the most perfect which can be made, for the errors of the instrument being the same in each case, and the refraction almost the same, no error can creep in except that of noting the phenomenon. The star which is sometimes called the determining star, or the star of comparison, is afterwards observed by meridian instruments, and then the place of the comet is deduced with the greatest accuracy. Frequently, however, there is a dearth of stars of comparison, and the time before a proper star enters the field is too long for the patience of the observer, or he may not have a micrometer. In this case the instrument is kept clamped in R.A., and after observing the comet, the telescope is moved up or down a little, and stars above and below the comet are observed, in R.A. by noting the clock, and in declination by reading the circle. The instrument should then be turned half round in R.A., and the operation repeated. By combining both sets, as good a place of the comet will be deduced as the division of the declination circle will allow. The stars of comparison are taken above and below, so that the mean of the instru mental errors at the stars may be pretty nearly equal to that at the comet, and as the effect in R.A. of an error of collimation or inclination is changed in sign by reversion, it is therefore eliminated from the mean. The instrument must on no account be moved in R.A. between the observation of the comet and the stars of comparison. In this way Halley's comet was observed at Greenwich and Cambridge, the stars of comparison were subsequently observed with the meridan instruments, and the apparent places of the comet finally settled. The details will be found in the observations of the respective observatories for the year 1835.

If the utmost accuracy be not required, it is sufficient, after careful adjustment, to note the transit of the comet over the vertical wires, and to read off the declination and hour circle, and then turning the instrument upon one or more neighbouring stars, to observe thein in like manner. The nearer the stars of comparison are to the comet, the greater probability there is that there is no change, or only a slight change of instrumental error in moving from one to the other. This mode of observation, however, is only to be tolerated in cases of necessity, when, either from haste or uncertain weather, the observer cannot wait for stars coming to the same meridian with the comet.

Suppose the following observations to have been made of Arcturus and of an unknown star or comet, after correcting each for refraction.

[merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small]
[merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small]

The star of comparison is, in this case, much too distant both in R.A. and N.P.D.; and the index error ought to be determined by stars above and below the comet, and preceding and succeeding it. Also, after the observations have been made in one position of the instru ment, it ought to be turned half round and the observations repeated; but the mode of ascertaining and applying the corrections is the same, and needs no further explanation.

The accompanying figure represents the portable universal equatorial as constructed by Troughton (a drawing and description of a similar instrument, under the title of Fayrer's Equatorial will be found in

[graphic][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][merged small][subsumed]

Rees's Cyclopædia,' article EQUATORIAL). The lower part or stand rests on three foot-screws, and needs no description. The upper part is moveable on a cross axis AA, on which it is balanced; and when the polar axis is set at the proper inclination by the latitude semicircle B, the clamp c retains it there. The polar axis consists of an outer tube, DD, forming one piece with the horizontal axis above-mentioned, and of an interior axis which turns freely within the tube as in a socket. This latter axis carries the hour circle, E E, the verniers, FF, being fixed to the tube. The clamp and tangent screw of the hour-circle are partially seen at G G. The upper plate H is fixed on the inner axis, and revolves with it. Two pieces, II, rise from this plate, and carry the collars within which the cross or transit axis, KK, works. The declination circle, LL, and telescope, M M, are fixed to the extremities of the transit axis, the telescope being outside the collar. The declination clamp and tangent screw are seen at N N; the verniers are on the other side. These are attached to the support which rises from the plate H. Two levels are fixed on the lower part of the stand at oo, but they are only to be used for approximate adjustment. A delicate swing level, P, is hung from the transit axis, and a second level, Q, is fixed to the declination circle. The telescope has a micrometer, B, carrying wires for measuring small differences of decli

nation.

It is evident to those who know Fraunhofer's construction, that it is identical with the upper part of this universal equatorial. The suspension and motion of the polar axis and hour circle are the same as in the equatorial made by Troughton for the University of Coimbra. The position of the telescope is that of Megnié and Nairne.

the foot-screws rest.

The rules we have already given will enable any one to adjust the universal equatorial; but if the direction of the meridian be known, it is a simpler plan to adjust the instrument as an altitude and azimuth circle, which it becomes when the polar axis is vertical, and then by inclining the polar axis to the latitude of the place, it becomes an equatorial. There is no provision in the instrument itself for moving the polar axis in azimuth. The whole must be turned bodily, and for this purpose some preparation should be made in the stand on which The following references will be useful to the reader. A clock for carrying an equatorial, constructed by Messrs. Troughton and Simms, is described in the Abstracts of the Proceedings of the Royal Astronomical Society,' vol. iii., No. 6, with a wood-cut. This would probably act somewhat more steadily with a horizontal fly-wheel upon the vertical axis, but its performance is very good. An account of the slipping piece and the wire micrometer to be applied to the equatorial for observing double stars, with directions for their use, is given in the appendix to the Companion to the Maps of the Stars published by the Society for the Diffusion of Useful Knowledge,' 1836. For the mode of using the equatorial as a measuring circle, see the Cambridge and Greenwich Observations' for 1835 and 1836 of Halley's Comet, of the Solar Eclipse, and of the elongation of Jupiter's fourth Satellite; and for the corrections for refraction and parallax, the Introduction to the Greenwich Observations,' 1836, to which the reader should look if he wishes to know the best methods of making and reducing astronomical observations in general. Sir George Shuckburgh's Memoir' already referred to contains a valuable history of the instrument, though on consulting the authorities, we have been led occasionally to differ from him. A description | of Ramsden's refraction piece will be found at page 19 of Shuckburgh's paper, along with a collection of tables for computing the effects of refraction and parallax in R.A. and N.P.D. from the data which this ingenious appendage affords. Pearson's 'Practical Astronomy,' vol. ii. p. 517; Littrow, Memoirs of the Astronomical Society,' vol. ii. p. 45; Kriel, Mem. Ast. Society,' vol. iv. p. 495.

[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]

EQUERRIES (from the French écurie, a stable), the name given to certain officers of the Royal household in the department of the master of the horse, the first of whom is styled chief equerry and clerkmarshal. Their duties fall in rotation. When the sovereign rides abroad in state, an equerry attends. Officers of the same denomination form a part of the established households of the royal dukes, &c. EQUIANGULAR, EQUILATERAL, EQUI-CRURAL, EQUITANGENTIAL, &c. &c., a class of words beginning with EQUI, which, in composition forms an adjective expressive of the equality of two things spoken of. Thus equiangular means having equal angles, and so on. There is a certain liability to confusion, arising from mistaking between the application of such terms to different parts of the same figure and to different figures. Thus an equilateral triangle' must mean a triangle which has three sides all equal. But two triangles which are equilateral' may mean two triangles in which every side of the first has its equal among those of the second: the two not being separately equilateral. To avoid this, it is sometimes said that two triangles, such as have just been mentioned, are mutually equilateral.

EQUILIBRIUM (aqua libra), a state of rest produced by the mutual counteraction of two or more forces. The science of equilibrium is STATICS.

EQUIMULTIPLES, multiples in which equal numbers of times are taken. Thus seven times A and seven times B are equi-multiples of ▲ and B : a league and a yard are equimultiples of a mile and a foot. The student of the fifth book of Euclid should remember that this

word has no singular number: 7 A and 7 B are equimultiples, but 7 A
is not therefore to be called an equimultiple but one of the equi-
multiples. And the same of the word equal, whether separately or in
composition: A and B may be equal lines, but a is not an equal line.
Equality implies comparison of at least two things.
EQUINOCTIAL, a name given to the equator, from the night
being equal to the day when the sun is there.

EQUINOXES, the intersections of the equator and ecliptic; the vernal equinox being that in which the sun is when about to rise into the northern hemisphere; the autumnal equinox being that in which the sun is when about to sink in the southern hemisphere. These terms are relative: for the equinox which is vernal in our hemisphere is autumnal in the southern, and vice versâ.

12

EQUISE TIC ACID, Aconitic Acid (3HO, C, H, O,) an acid discovered by Bracconot in the equisetum fluviatile, in which it exists combined with magnesia.

This acid may be obtained in small colourless radiating crystals; its taste is sharp, and somewhat analogous to that of tartaric acid: it is unalterable in the air. When heated, it decomposes without subliming, and yields an oily uncrystallisable acid product. It dissolves readily both in alcohol and in water: the solution gives no precipitate either with lime or baryta water, but with acetate of lead and protonitrate of mercury it gives white curdy precipitates: it precipitates the persalts, but not protosalts of iron.

With potash and soda it yields deliquescent uncrystallisable salts; with ammonia, a crystallisable salt. With oxide of zinc, with lime, and magnesia, it forms uncrystallisable transparent compounds, which are unalterable in the air. [ACONITIC ACID; CITRIC ACID.]

EQUITES (horsemen), the name of an order in the Roman state. Their origin, according to the old tradition, was this:-Romulus having divided his subjects into three tribes, chose from each one hundred young men whom he destined to serve on horseback and act as his body-guard; this body of cavalry was called the celeres, and afterwards the equites. (Dionys., ii. 13.) Niebuhr supposes ('Hist. of Rome,') that whereas patres and patricii were titles of honour for individuals, celeres was the name of the whole class as distinguished from the rest of the nation. The three centuries of the celeres were called by the same names as the three tribes of the patricians, namely, Ramnes, Tities, and Luceres. Their tribunes are spoken of as a college of priests (Dionys., ii. 64), and it appears that the tribes of the patricians had also tribunes (Dionys., ii. 7). Moreover, when it is said that Tarquinius Priscus made three new centuries, which he added to the former three, and that the whole went under the name of the Sex Suffragia, or the six equestrian centuries, we cannot doubt that the alteration which he introduced was a constitutional and not merely a military one; that in fact the centuries which he formed were, like the original three, tribes of houses; that his innovation was nothing but an extension of the political division of the inhabitants of Rome under Romulus. (Niebuhr, "Hist. of Rome.") When Servius Tullius established the comitia of the centuries, he received the sex suffragia, which included all the patricians, into his first class; and to them he added twelve other equestrian centuries, made up of the richest of the plebeian order. (Niebuhr.) The ancient writers appear to have laboured under some great confusion with regard to this arrangement. Livy (i. 43) makes a proper distinction between the twelve equestrian centuries created by Servius and the six which existed before; but when he states (i. 36) that the cavalry in the reign of Tarquinius Priscus amounted to 1800, he appears to be antedating the origin of the eighteen equestrian centuries which formed part of the constitution of Servius. To the establishment of the comitia centuriata the creation of a body of equites, as a distinct order, seems to be due. The plan of Servius was, to a certain extent, identical with that of Solon. The object of both legislators was to break down the limits to which the old aristocracy was confined, and to set up an order of wealth by the side of the order of birth: not, however, that when a person could produce his 400,000 sesterces, he became ipso facto a knight, as was the case in after times. (Hor. "Ep." i. 1, 57.) According to the Servian constitution, good birth or the sanction of the censors was necessary for gaining a place in the equestrian order. (Polyb., vi. 20; Zonaras, vii. 19.) When Cicero says ("De Republica," ii. 20) that Tarquinius established the equestrian order on the same footing as that on which it stood in his own time, and also attributes to the same king the assigning of money to the equites for the purchase and keep of their horses, he is evidently inconsistent. In Tarquin's time, that is, before there was any plebeian order, it was natural enough that the poorer patricians, who were obliged to serve on horseback, just as the 'Ins at Athens, who were a poorer class than the Pentakosiomedimnoi, (Plut., "Sol." c. 18.) should be furnished with the means for doing so. But the case was different with the equites after the establishment of an order of wealth. A man might then be of equestrian rank, and yet have no horse assigned to him; thus, on the one hand, we find at the time of the siege of Veii a number of equites serving on horseback at their own expense (Liv., v. 7); and, on the contrary, L. Tarquitius, who was a patrician, was obliged to serve on foot from his poverty. (Liv., iii. 27.) From this it appears probable that a certain sum was fixed which it was not necessary for every eques to have, but the possessor of which was obliged to serve on horseback at his own expense if no horse could be given him by the public, and that those

[ocr errors]

939

EQUITY.

whose fortune fell short of this were obliged to serve in the infantry
under the same circumstances.

The lieutenant of the dictator was called "the chief of the equites"
(Magister Equitum); and although in later times he was appointed to
this office by the dictator himself, it is probable, as Niebuhr conjec-
tures (i., p. 559), that he was originally elected by the twelve centuries
of Plebeian equites just as the dictator, or Magister Populi, was by the
Sex Suffragia, in other words, by the Populus or Patricians.

revenues.

With regard to the functions of the equites, besides their military
duties, they had to act as judices or jurymen under the Sempronian
law under the Servilian law the judices were chosen from the senate
as well as from the equites: by the Glaucian law the equites alone per-
formed the office, and so on by alternate changes till the law of Aurelius
Cotta (B.C. 70), by which the judices were chosen from the senators,
The equites also farmed the public
equites, and tribuni ærarii.
Those who were engaged in this business were called the
Publicani; and though Cicero, who was himself of the equestrian
order, speaks of these farmers as "the flower of the Roman equites, the
ornament of the state, the safeguard of the republic" (Pro Plancio,'9),
it appears that they were a set of detestable oppressors, who made
themselves odious in all the provinces by their avarice and rapacity.
The equites, as it may be inferred from what has been already said,
gradually lost the marks of their distinctive origin, and became, as they
were in the time of Cicero for instance, an ordo or class of persons as
distinguished from the senate and the plebs. They had particular
seats assigned to them in the circus and the theatre. The insignia of
their rank, in addition to the horse, were, a golden ring and the an-
gustus clavus, or narrow band, on their dress, as distinguished from the
latus clavus or broad band of the senators: the two last insignia seem
to have remained after the former ceased to possess its original and
distinctive character.

EQUITY, according to the definition given by Aristotle, is "the
rectification of the law, when, by reason of its universality, it is
deficient; for this is the reason that all things are not determined by
law, because it is impossible that a law should be enacted concerning
some things; so that there is need of a decree or decision; for of the
indefinite the rule also is indefinite: as among Lesbian builders the
rule is leaden, for the rule is altered to suit the figure of the stone,
and is not fixed, and so is a decree or decision to suit the circumstances."
Equity," says Blackstone, "in its
(Ethics, B. v. c. 01, Oxford trans.)
true and genuine meaning, is the soul and spirit of all law; positive
law is construed and rational law is made by it. In this respect,
equity is synonymous with justice; in that, to the true and sound
interpretation of the rule." According to Grotius, equity is the
correction of that wherein the law, by reason of its generality, is
deficient.

[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]

Until jurisprudence has become really a science based on settled
principles, some such jurisdiction as our earlier law-writers have
attributed to the courts of equity is necessary to the due adminis-
tration of justice; and it is probable that in England it deserved the
Equity
humorous description given by Selden in his 'Table Talk:
in law is the same that spirit is in religion, what every one pleases to
make it; sometimes they go according to conscience, sometimes
according to law, sometimes according to the rule of court. Equity is
a roguish thing; for law we have a measure, know what to trust to;
equity is according to the conscience of him that is chancellor, and as
that is larger or narrower, so is equity. It is all one as if they should
make the standard for the measure we call a foot a chancellor's foot;
what an uncertain measure would this be! One chancellor has a long
foot, another a short foot, a third an indifferent foot: it is the same
thing in the chancellor's conscience."

This uncertainty has however long ceased in that branch of our law
which is expressed by the term Equity, and, from successive decisions,
rules as strict and principles as fixed have been framed and established
in our courts of equity as in our courts of law. New cases, it is true,
may and do arise, but they are decided upon these ascertained rules
and principles, and not from the notions of the judge as to what may
be reasonable or just in the particular case before him. Nothing in
fact is more common than to hear the chancellor say, that whatever
may be his own opinion, he is bound by the authorities, that is, by
the decisions of his predecessors in office and those of the other judges
in equity; that he will not shake any settled rule concerning property,
&c., it being for the common good that these should be certain and
known, however ill-founded the first resolution may have been.
In its enlarged sense, equity answers precisely to the definition of
justice, or natural law (as it is called), as given in the Pandects'
(lib. i. tit. 1, 1, 10, 11); and it is remarkable that subsequent writers
on this so-called natural law, and also the authors of modern treatises
on the doctrine of equity, as administered in the English courts, have,
with scarcely any exception, cited the above passage from Aristotle as
a definition of equity in our peculiar sense of a separate jurisdiction.
But according to this general definition every court is a court of
equity, of which a familiar instance occurs in the construction of
statutes, which the judges of the courts of common law constantly
interpret according to the spirit, or, as it is called, the equity, not the
strict letter.

6

It is hardly possible to define equity as now administered in this country, or to make it intelligible otherwise than by a minute

EQUITY.

"It is no longer," administered in its restrained and qualified sense. enumeration of the matters cognisable in the courts in which it is says Sir James Mackintosh in his life of Sir Thomas More, "in the acceptation in which the word is used in English jurisprudence, to be confounded with that moral equity which generally corrects the unjust operation of law, and with which it seems to have been formed from usages and determinations which sometimes differ from synonymous in the days of Selden and Bacon. It is a part of laws what is called common law in its subjects, but chiefly varies from it in its mode of proof, of trial, and of relief."

In this country the remedies for the redress of wrongs and for the are administered in courts of law, and those which are administered in enforcement of rights are distinguished into two classes, those which courts of equity; the former are called legal rights and wrongs, the latter equitable. Equity jurisdiction may therefore properly be defined as that portion of remedial justice which is administered by a court of equity as distinguished from a court of law, from which a court of equity differs mainly in the subject matters of which it takes cogniCourts of common law in this country proceed by certain prescribed zance and in its mode of procedure and remedies. forms of action alone, and give relief only according to the particular exigency of such actions, by a general and unqualified judgment for a simple judgment for either party, without qualifications or conditions, the plaintiff or the defendant. There are many cases, however, in which or peculiar arrangements, will not do entire justice. Some modificaon one side, or the other, or perhaps on both; some qualifications or tions of the rights of both parties may be required; some restraints to the exercise of rights, or the redress of injuries. To accomplish conditions present or future, temporary or permanent, to be annexed according to their present constitution they can only adjudicate by a Such prescribed forms of such objects the courts of law in this country have no machinery: simple judgment between the parties. actions are not confined to our own system of laws; they were known in the civil law, and the party could apply them only to their original purposes. In other cases he had a special remedy. Courts of equity, however, are not so restrained; they adjudicate by decree pronounced upon a statement of his case by the plaintiff, and the answer of the if necessary, with the evidence of all parties, also given upon oath. defendant given in upon oath, and the evidence of witnesses, together, These decrees are so adjusted as to meet all the exigencies of the so as to suit it to mutual and adverse claims, and the real and subparticular case, and they vary, qualify, restrain, and model the remedy stantial rights of all the parties so far as such rights are acknowledged by the established rules of equity.

The courts of equity bring before them all the parties interested in the subject matter of the suit, and adjust the rights of all however numerous; whereas courts of law in this country are compelled by their constitution to limit their inquiry to the litigating parties, although other persons may be interested: that is, they give a complete remedy in damages or otherwise for the particular wrong in question as between the parties to the action, though such remedy is obviously in many cases an incomplete adjudication upon the general rights of the parties to the action, and fails altgether as to other persons, not parties to the action, who yet may be interested in the result or in the subject matter in dispute.

[ocr errors]

Perhaps the most general as well as the most precise description of a court of equity is the outline given by Mr. Justice Story in the Encyclopædia Americana,' which he afterwards filled up in his welldiction in cases where a plain, adequate, and complete remedy cannot The remedy must be plain, for known Treatise on Equity. It is this-that a court of equity has jurisbe had in the common law courts.

if it be doubtful and obscure at law, equity will assert a jurisdiction.
It must be adequate, for if at law it fall short of what the party is
entitled to, that founds a jurisdiction in equity; and it must be
complete, that is, it must attain the full end and justice of the case,
it must reach the whole mischief and secure the whole right of the
party present and future, otherwise equity will interpose and give
relief. The jurisdiction of a court of equity is sometimes concurrent
with the jurisdiction of the courts of law; sometimes assistant to it;
and sometimes exclusive. It exercises concurrent jurisdiction in cases
more efficient aid is required than a court of law can afford. In some
where the rights are purely of a legal nature, but where other and
grant it. For strict law comprehending established rules, and the
of these cases courts of law formerly refused all redress, but now will
jurisdiction of equity being called into action when the purposes of
justice rendered an exception to those rules necessary, successive
exceptions on the same grounds became the foundation of a general
principle, and could no longer be considered as a singular interposition.
Thus law and equity are in continual progression, and the former is
constantly gaining ground upon the latter. Every new and extra-
a great part of what is now strict law was formerly considered as
ordinary interposition is by length of time converted into an old rule;
equity, and the equitable decisions of this age will unavoidably be
ranked under the strict law of the next. (Prof. Millar's View of the
acquired at a time when there was no such redress at law, it is
English Government.') But the jurisdiction having been once justly
not now relinquished by the courts of equity.

The most common exercise of the concurrent jurisdiction is in

cases of account, accident, dower, fraud, mistake, partnership, and partition. In many cases which fall under these heads, and especially in some cases of fraud, mistake, and accident, courts of law cannot and do not afford any redress: in others they do, but not in so complete a manner as a court of equity.

This attempt at the exposition of the general principles of what in this country is called equity seems to the writer of this article to be better suited to a work of this nature than a full description of the practice of, that is, the course of proceeding in, a suit in a court of equity. The practice or procedure of any court can hardly be made intelligible to any person but one who knows something of it by experience; and any technical description of it is useless unless it is minutely and circumstantially exact. It is desirable, however, that in addition to some knowledge of the subjects which belong to the jurisdiction of a court of equity, all persons should have some clear notion of the way in which the matters in dispute between parties to a suit in equity are brought before the court, and by what kind of proof or evidence they are established. It may also be useful that persons should have a general, and so far as it goes, a correct know. in issue, and proved in our courts of law and equity. The following short outline of the course of proceeding in a suit of chancery, taken in connection with other articles in this work, such as CHANCELLOR, CHANCERY, DEPOSITION, and PLEADING, may probably, so far as it goes, give somewhat more information on the subject of equity jurisdiction than is found in books not strictly professional.

A court of equity is also assistant to the jurisdiction of the courts of law in cases where the latter have no like authority. It will remove legal impediments to the fair decision of a question depending at law, as by restraining a party from improperly setting up, at a trial, some title or claim which would prevent the fair decision of the question in dispute; by compelling him to discover, upon his own oath, facts which are material to the right of the other party, but which a court of law cannot compel him to disclose; by perpetuating, that is, by taking and keeping in its custody, the testimony of witnesses, which is in danger of being lost before the matter can be tried; and by pro-ledge of the different modes in which such questions of fact are put viding for the safety of property in dispute pending litigation. It will also counteract and control fraudulent judgments, by restraining the parties from insisting upon them.

The exclusive jurisdiction of a court of equity is chiefly exercised in cases of merely equitable rights, that is, such rights as are not recognised in courts of law. Most cases of trust and confidence fall under this head. This exclusive jurisdiction is exercised in granting injunctions to prevent waste or irreparable injury; to secure a settled right, or to prevent vexatious litigation; in appointing receivers of property which is in danger of being misapplied; in compelling the surrender of securities improperly obtained; in preventing a party from leaving the country in order to avoid a suit; in restraining any undue exercise of a legal right; in enforcing specific performance of contracts; in supplying the defective execution of instruments, and reforming, that is, correcting and altering them according to the real intention of the parties, when such intention can be satisfactorily proved; and in granting relief in cases where deeds and securities

have been lost.

Much discussion has taken place and various opinions have been expressed upon the question whether it would or would not be best to administer the whole of remedial justice in one court or in one class of courts without any separation or distinction of suits, or of the forms or modes of procedure and relief. Lord Bacon, upon more than one occasion, has expressed his decided opinion that a separation of the administration of equity from that of the common law is wise and convenient. "All nations," says he, "have equity, but some have law and equity mixed in the same court, which is worse, and sonie have it distinguished in several courts, which is better;" and again, "In some states, that jurisdiction which decrees according to equity and moral right, and that which decrees according to strict right, is committed to the same court; in others, they are committed to different courts. We entirely opine for the separation of the courts; for the distinction of the cases will not long be attended to if the jurisdictions meet in the same person; and the will of the judges will then master the law."

Lord Hardwicke held the same opinion. Lord Mansfield, it is to be presumed, thought otherwise, for he endeavoured to introduce equitable doctrines into the courts of law. The old strictness has however been restored. His successor, Lord Kenyon, made use of these expressions: "If it had fallen to my lot to form a system of jurisprudence, whether or not I should have thought it advisable to establish different courts, with different jurisdictions, and governed by different rules, it is not necessary to say; but influenced as I am by certain prejudices that have become inveterate with those who comply with the systems they find established, I find that in these courts, proceeding by different rules, a certain combined system of jurisprudence has been framed most beneficial to the people of this country, and which I hope I may be indulged in supposing has never yet been equalled in any other country on earth. Our courts of law only consider legal rights; our courts of equity have other rules, by which they sometimes supersede strict legal rules, and in doing so they act most beneficially for the subject." In this country the principle of separating jurisdictions has been largely acted upon. We have our courts of equity and law; our bankrupt and insolvent courts, and courts of ecclesiastical and admiralty jurisdiction; indeed, until recent times, our several courts of law had, in principle, jurisdiction only over certain specified classes of suits. In countries governed by the civil law, the practice has in general been the other way. But whether the one opinion or the other be the more correct in theory, the system adopted by every nation has been mainly influenced by the peculiarities of its own institutions, habits, and circumstances, and the forms of its remedial justice. In all such cases the separation or union of the equitable and legal jurisdiction must be a mixed question of public policy and private convenience.

In some of the American States, the administration of law and equity is perfectly distinct; in others the administration of equity is only partially committed to distinct courts; in a third class the two jurisdictions are vested in one and the same tribunal; and in a fourth there are no courts exercising an equitable jurisdiction.

A suit in the courts of chancery is commenced by presenting a petition to the lord chancellor, containing a statement of the plaintiff's case, and praying for such relief as he may consider himself entitled to receive. This petition is technically called a Bill, and is in the nature of the declaration at common law [DECLARATION]; but if the suit is instituted on behalf of the crown, or a charity, or any of the objects under the peculiar protection of the crown, the petition is in the form of a narrative of the facts by the attorney-general, and is called an Information. There is also a petition termed an Information and Bill, which is where the attorney-general, at the relation (that is, the information) of a third person (thence called the relator) informs the court of the facts which he thinks are a fit subject of inquiry. The practice which governs all these proceedings is the same. It used to be the practice at the end of the statement in a bill to add what was called the interrogating part, consisting of the statements of the bill thrown into the form of distinct questions, and often expressed in terms of great length and particularity. But by a recent enactment, a bill no longer contains interrogatories, which may, however, if thought requisite, be filed separately. The statements in the bill are not made upon oath; and further, in order to obtain a full and complete discovery from the defendant, both as regards the complaint and the supposed defence, various allegations are made in many cases from mere conjecture, and this practice, it has been considered after much laboured discussion, tends to the due administration of justice; for though doubtless many frivolous suits are instituted, yet, from the nature of cases of fraud and concealment, the plaintiff is often ignorant of the precise nature of the case, and frames his bill in various forms so as to elicit from the defendant a full discovery of the truth. of this nature are called original bills, and either may be for discovery and relief, or for discovery merely.

Bills

When the bill is placed on the records of the court it is said to be filed, and the writ of subpoena issues commanding the defendant to appear and answer the allegations of the bill within a certain time. If, upon the face of the bill, it should appear that the plaintiff is not entitled to the relief prayed for as against the defendant, the defendant may demur,--that is, demand the judgment of the court upon the statement made by the plaintiff, whether the suit shall proceed [DEMURRER]; and if any cause, not apparent upon the bill, should exist why the suit should be either dismissed, delayed, or barred, the defendant may put in a plea, stating such matter, and demanding the judgment of the court, as in the case of a demurrer. But if neither of these modes of defence are applicable, and the defendant cannot disclaim [DISCLAIMER], he must answer upon oath the interrogatories in the bill according to the best of his knowledge, remembrance, information, and belief. This mode of defence is styled an Answer. All or any of these several modes of defence may be used together, if applied to separate and distinct parts of the case made by the plaintiff.

In the successive stages of a suit, references as to the pleadings, and as to facts, may be made to the judges in equity sitting at chambers, who conduct the routine part of the business through their chief clerks. These references were formerly made to the Masters of the court. If the defendant does not answer the bill with sufficient precision, the plaintiff may except to the answer for insufficiency. If the answer is decided to be insufficient, the defendant must answer further.

It frequently happens that, during the progress of the suit, from the discovery of new matter, the deaths and marriages of parties, and other causes, the pleadings become defective, and in these cases it is necessary to bring the new matter, or parties becoming interested, before the court. This is done by means of further statements, which are now introduced by way of amendments to the bill, or by obtaining leave of the court to revive a suit which has abated, proceedings which recent legislation has rendered very simple and rapid. Formerly the same thing was done by fresh bills, called supplemental bills, bills of In most of our colonies the governor is invested with the jurisdic-revivor, or bills of revivor and supplement, according to the nature of tion of chancellor; but in some of the greatest importance where a the defect which they were intended to supply. judicial establishment of some magnitude is maintained, the chief or supreme court is invested with the chancery jurisdiction.

Pleas and demurrers are at once argued before the court: if allowed, the suit, or so much of it as is covered by the demurrer or plea, is at

« EelmineJätka »