BUTTERWORTHS, 7, FLEET STREET, EDINBURGH: T. & T. CLARK, AND BELL & BRADFUTE. 1851. VII.—THE BILL FOR THE BETTER ADMINIS- TRATION OF JUSTICE IN THE COURT De Visme v. De Visme, 1 M'N. & Gor. 336; The At- torney-General v. The Corporation of London, 2 M'N. & Gor. 247; S. C. 2 M'N. & Gor. 269. 147-155 Cleave v. Jones (in error), 20 Law J. Exch. 238; Grant v. Norway, 20 Law J. C. P. 93; Mead v. Bashford, 20 Law J. (N. S.) Exch. 190; Regina v. Hill, 15 Jurist, 470; 2 Denison's C. C. 254; Jones v. Harrison, 20 Law J. Exch. 166; S. C. 15 Jur. 337; Latham v. Spedding, 15 Jur. 576; Wakeman v. Lindsay, 19 Law J. Q. B. 166; Kerby v. Harding, 20 Law J. Exch. 163; Hella- well v. Eastwood, 20 Law J. Exch. 154; Amber- gate Railway Company v. Norcliffe (in error), 20 Law J. Exch. 234 156-167 |