Brett v. Carmichael (35 L. J. 369, Ch.)......... 247, 820
Bridport, Lyme, and South Coast Railway Bill, The ;
Objection to the locus standi of the London and
South-Western Railway Company
Briggs, ex parte, re The Hop and Malt Exchange and
Warehouse Company (Limited) (35 L. J. 320, Ch.)
Briggs v.. Oliver (35 L. J. 163, Ex.)
Brighton and Hove General Gas Bill, The; Objection
to the locus standi of May, Ingram, and others
Brooks v. Jernings (12 Jur. N. S. 341).............
Brown v. Brown
Collyer v. Collyer (12 Jur. N. S. 493)
Commercial Bank Corporation of India and the East
Companies Act 1862, and The Doncaster Benefit
Building and Investment Society.
Companies Act 1862, re, re The General Exchange
Bank (Limited)...
825 Companies Act 1862, re, re The London Cotton
Manufacturing Company (Limited).................
Companies Act 1862, re, and re The Oriental Com-
mercial Bank (Limited)
Bransby v. The East London Bank
Clegg v. Rowland (35 L. J. 396)..
Clinton v. Clinton.................
Coleby v. Coleby (12 Jur. N. S. 496)
Coleman's Trusts, re
..................................
Collis's Estate, re.........
Butt v. The Imperial Gas Light and Coke Company... 349 Combs, James, In the Goods of (35 L. J. 78, Prob.
Caledonian and Scottish North-Eastern Railway
Companies Bill, The........
Caledonian and Scottish North-Eastern Railway
Companies Bill, The; Objection to the locus standi
of the Harbour Commissioners of Aberdeen; and
the Objections to the locus standi of The Harbour
Trustees of Dundee
...............579, 580
Calne Railway Bill, The; Objection to the locus standi
of the Petition of the Great Western Railway
Company
Cambridge, Borough of.......................
Cambridge University and Town Waterworks Bill;
Objection to the locus standi of the Cambridge-
shire, Isle of Ely, and Borough of Cambridge
Pauper Lunatic Asylum
Cambridge University and Town Waterworks Bill;
Objection to the locus standi of the Petition of
the Master, Fellows, and Scholars of Sidney Sus-
sex College, Cambridge.........
Cookes v. Cookes (12 Jur. N. S. 244)
Coombs v. Coombs (12 Jur. N. S. 673) ....
Coombs v. Dibble (12 Jur. N. S. 456; 35 L. J. 167,
Ex.)....
Coope v. Cresswell (35 L. J. 496, Ch.)
Cooper and another v. Lands
Corbett, re (12 Jur. N. S. 679)............................
Cork and Youghal Railway Company, re......................................... 750
Cosnahan, J., in the Goods of.........
Cottrell v. Cottrell (12 Jur. N. S. 285; 35 L. J.
466, Ch.)
Q. B.)
Forsbrook v. Forsbrook (12 Jur. N. S. 285) ......... 282
Foster v. Dodd and another (12 Jur. N. S. 466; 35
L. J. 136, Q. B.)
Freehold General Land Investment Company (Limited)
v. The Metropolitan District Railway Company...
Fry The Chartered Mercantile Bank of India,
London, and China
Galloway v. Mayor of London (35 L. J. 477, Ch.)... 865
Galway, Borough of
Harrell v. Wilts and Humbley (12 Jur. N. S. 673)... 137
Harris, ex parte, re Ash (12 Jur. N. S. 518; 35
L. J. 21, Bank.)
611
Harrold v. The Great Western Railway Company...... 440
Hartland v. The General Exchange Bank Limited)... 863
Hartley v. Hindmarch (12 Jur. N. S. 502)............ 795
709 Harwich (No. 1), The Borough of ........................................... 380
720 Harwich (No. 2), The Borough of
... 283
Hattersley and others (apps.) v. Burr (resps.)......... 565
Hawksley and Hughes v. Barrow (35 L. J. 67, Prob.
& Mat.)...
Garrett v. Salsbury and Dorset Junction Railway
Gauter v. Meinertshaagen..
General Exchange Bank (Limited), re, re The Com-
panies Act 1862 (12 Jur. N. S. 465)
General International Agency Company (Limited), re,
ez parte Abel Chapman
Gibson, Elizabeth, In the Goods of (12 Jur. N. S. 344)
Giddings and another v. Penning (12 Jur. N. S. 634 ;
Gill. Newton (12 Jur. N. S. 220)
Glaholm . Barker (35 L. J. 657, Ch.)
Goff's Estate, re (12 Jur. N. S. 595)
Goldsmid o. The Tunbridge Wells Improvement Com-
missioners (12 Jur. N. S. 308; 35 L. J. 382, Ch.) 154
MacAndrew and another v. Chapple and others (12
MacGregor e. Metropolitan Railway Company
McLachlan v. Lord
Macrae v. Clarke (12 Jur. N. S. 708; 35 L. J. 247,
C. P.)
Madrid Bank (Liunited), re (35 L. J. 474, Ch.).
Maggie Armstrong, The, v. The Blue Bell .......... 340
Major v. The Park Lane Company (Limited)
Mallinson v. Mallinson (35 L. J. 84, Prob. & Mat.) 636
Marks, ex parte, re Marks.........
37, 318
Marshall v. Gilliard (12 Jur. N. S. 483)
618
Martin e. Headon (12 Jur. N. S. 387; 35 L. J. 602,
Ch.)
Oriental Commercial Bank (Limited) re, re The
Companies Act 1862........
Office of the Judge promoted by the Bishop of
Norwich v. Berney
Oakley v. Mouck (12 Jur. N. S. 213).................. 20
O'Brien v. Brodie (12 Jur. N. S. 527; 35 L. J. 188,
Ex.)....
Official Liquidator of the Leeds Banking Company
ex parte. 1e William Kirby
Ohrloff v. Briscall (12 Jur. N. S. 675)
Osborn v. Duke of Marlborough (12 Jur. N. S. 559) 789
Overend, Gurney, and Co. (Limited) re, ex parte
Grissell (12 Jur. N. S. 718)....
Overseers of the Poor of Hilton, &c. (apps.), Over-
seers of Bowes (resps.)
Maryport Improvement Harbour and Dock Bill, The;
Objection to the locus stondi of the Whitehaven
Junction Railway Company; Objection to the locus
stan li of the Right Hon. Geo. Lord Leconfield 112,
Mason's Claims, re Drew
Parry, Ann, re, ex parte Duke of Beaufort (12 Jur.
N. S. 699; 35 L. J. 651, Ch.)
Patent Bread Machinery Company (Limited), re...... 582
Paterson v. Paterson (35 L. J. 518, Ch.; 12 Jur.
National Financial Corporation, re...
Needam r. Bremnar (12 Jur. N. S. 434)............ 437
Nicholson v. The Guardians of the Bradfield Union
(12 Jur. N. S. 686; 35 L. J. 176, Q. B.) . ......... 830
Niell v. Whitworth (35 L. J. 304, C. P.) ............ 670
North American, The, v. The Wild Rose
Northampton and Banbury Junction Railway Bill,
The; Objection to the locus standi of the Trustees
of the Tewkesbury Severn Bridge and Roads and
T. Taylor......
Scott v. Uxbridge and Rickmansworth Railway Com-
pany (12 Jur. N. S. 602; 35 L. J. 293, C. P.) ... 596
Seagrave v. The Union Marine Insurance Company
(12 Jur. N. S. 358; 35 L. J. 172, C. P.)
479
Searle (app.) v. Reynolds (resp.)
... 518
Seixo v. Provezende (12 Jur. N. S. 215)............................. 314
Settled Estates Acts and Robert Tunstall's Will, re.. 552
Shackleford's Case, re Rolling Stock Company of
Ireland
Sharp v. The North-Eastern Railway Company
Sharp v. Wright
Tarsey's Trusts, re (12 Jur. N. S. 370; 35 L. J.
452, Ch.)..
|