Page images
PDF
EPUB

affected, held to raise the presumption that all that was necessary to obtain such right had been done. London and North-Western Railway v. Evans (62 L. J. Ch. 1; [1893] 1 Ch. 16) approved. Clippens Oil Co. v. Edinburgh and District Water Trustees, (H.L. Sc.) 32.

WILL.

"Eldest son "-Failure of Limitations-Gift Over-Intestacy.]-The term "eldest son" in a will is properly applied to the elder of two sons, and if there be a person answering the description at the date of the will, such person, though he dies afterwards in the testator's lifetime, is an object of the testator's bounty, section 24 of the Wills Act, 1837, not having, with reference to the objects of bounty, the same effect as it has " with reference to the real and personal estate comprised in it." Amyot v. Dwarris, 40.

A testator devised real estate, after limita. tions which failed, to his sister's "eldest son," there being only two sons at that date, both of whom predeceased the testator without issue. A third son was born after the date of the will, but in the testator's lifetime, and survived the testator. There was no residuary devise in the will:-Held, that the estate did not go to the persons entitled under the third son, but vested in the appellant, the surviving trustee, as under an intestacy. Ib.

[ocr errors][merged small][merged small]
[merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small]
[blocks in formation]

TABLE OF CASES.

African Gold Recovery Co. v. Hay, 108
Amyot v. Dwarris, 40

Att.-Gen, of British Columbia v. Ostrum, 11
Att.-Gen. for Canada; Att.-Gen. for Manitoba,
v., 100

Att.-Gen. of the Cape of Good Hope v. Smit, 13
v. Van Reenen, 13
Att.-Gen. for Manitoba v. Att.-Gen. for Canada,
100

Att.-Gen. for New South Wales v. Dickson, 48 Att. Gen. for Trinidad and Tobago; New Trinidad Lake Asphalt Co. v., 97

[blocks in formation]
[blocks in formation]

Ostrum; Att.-Gen. of British Columbia v., 11
Oxford (Bishop); Moore v., 43

Pacific Co-operative Steam Coal Co. v. Railway
Commissioners of New South Wales, 86
Pauline Colliery and Development Syndicate;
Natal Land and Colonisation Co. V., 22
Phillips; Glenwood Lumber Co. v., 62

[blocks in formation]

THE

LAW JOURNAL REPORTS

FOR

THE YEAR 1904.

CASES

DECIDED IN THE

Probate, Divorce and Admiralty Division

OF

THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE

REPORTED BY

ROBERT MARSHALL MIDDLETON AND ARTHUR PRITCHARD, BARRISTERS-AT-LAW;

AND ON APPEAL THEREFROM

IN

The Court of Appeal and House of Lords,

REPORTED BY

WILLIAM EDWARD GORDON, GEORGE HUMPHREYS, JOSEPH SMITH, AUBREY JOHN SPENCER, AMY AND JOHN HALL, ARTHUR CORDERY,

AND (in the House of Lords) JAMES EYRE THOMPSON.
BARRISTERS-AT-LAW.

EDITOR:

JOHN MEWS.

SUB-EDITORS:

W. E. GORDON AND A. J. SPENCER.

VOLUME LXXIII.

[ CONTEMPORARY WITH LAW REP. [1904] P.: [1904] A.C.]

PUBLISHED FOR THE PROPRIETORS AT THE OFFICE OF

THE LAW JOURNAL REPORTS, 119 CHANCERY LANE. LONDON.

1904.

« EelmineJätka »