stock, and derive its sap, more or less modified, from the old root; but the Lord's New Church is neither a shoot from the old stock, nor does it derive its sap of life from the old root. Its shoot is derived from an entirely new germ, which is the Lord, in His Divine Humanity; whereas the Old Church, in its orthodox forms, is a growth from the tripersonal creed of Athanasius, which the New Church believes is the origin of all the falsities of doctrine that have so long and so fatally inundated the Church with every kind of falsehood and of evil. Now, it is an improper use of language to say that a tree which has sprung from an entirely new seed is a section of an old tree, or a graft from its trunk— we mean a tree which, from its barren and corrupt character, only "cumbers the ground," and which, by the process of judgment, we know has been cut down, and its roots blighted and withered with spiritual death. In making this remark, we do not mean that all the members of this consummated church partake of her evils and falses. Far from this is our thought; for we well know that in the consummated church there is a great remnant, signified by the one hundred and fortyfour thousand, out of every tribe and denomination, who have the “seal of God in their foreheads." To these the New Church addresses itself, and presents to them the precious seed of its heavenly doctrines from an enlightened interpretation of the Word, and affectionately exhorts them to come forth and “to behold the King in his beauty," even the Lord Jesus Christ, with his face shining as the sun, and his garments white as the light, as the one only Divine Person of the Godhead," in whom the fulness of the Godhead dwelleth bodily," and as the one only true Object of worship to angels and men—the Mighty God, the Everlasting Father, and the Prince of Peace. The New Church is, consequently, no more a sect of the Old Church than the Christian Church, in its beginning, was a sect of the Jewish. Another point to be considered, as suggested by our respected correspondent, is that of worship. He would, it seems, advise those who receive the doctrines of the New Church to remain, for the sake of earthly ties and connexions, in the denomination or sect in which their lot has been cast, and especially in the Church of England, which is "tolerant," and which, in the progress of events, is likely, "both as to doctrine and administration, to be much improved." This, we doubt not, will be the case, especially under the influence of a new reform in Parliament, as a new ultimate medium in the hands of the Lord's Providence. However dear the "earthly ties and connexions " may be which associate us with a consummated church, yet the voice of truth peremptorily commands those who receive the doctrines of the Church of the New Jerusalem, saying “Come out of her, my people, that ye be not partakers of her sins, and that ye receive not of her plagues." (Rev. xviii. 4.) For to give any countenance, either by our presence or by other means, to what we believe to be erroneous and false, is certainly to be in danger of being partakers of the sins, and of incurring the plagues of a fallen church. And this is the more inexcusable when opportunities are at hand of worshipping in harmony with the principles we possess. This inconsistency is justly condemned in things moral and civil, and we are quite certain it is even more to be condemned in things spiritual, upon which so much, as to our final states, must depend. Those who have received the doctines of the New Church with sincerity, and with any rational conviction, and still practise this inconsistency, for the sake of earthly considerations, must expect to consociate themselves interiorly with a class of spirits in opposition to their states, from whom, however, they must be separated before they can come to their proper home in the habitations and mansions of heaven. If this interior separation is not effected in this life, it can be effected in the other only by severe vastations, for there is nothing that consociates men so interiorly and so closely together as acts of worship, especially where sincerity prevails; and if there is no sincerity, but merely selfish and earthly considerations, the worship itself is but a mere mockery and profanity, and has no more spiritual efficacy in it than a "sounding brass or a tinkling cymbal." In favour of non-separation, Swedenborg, it is alleged by our correspondent," punctually attended the worship of the Lutheran Church, more intolerant than the Church of England." Swedenborg, it is true, was a man of deep piety; and, no doubt, up to the period of his spiritual illumination, was a strict observer of the duties of public worship, and, in his writings, a strenuous advocate of those sacred duties. But we learn from the "Documents concerning his Life and Character," &c., that, in his latter years, he rarely attended the Lutheran Church. Passing much of his time in England, where he was many years superintending his "Arcana Coelestia," and other works, through the press, he rarely, it is said, went to the Swedish Church; but, when there, the spirits who attended him contradicted what was heard, as being contrary to the truth, so that he could have no peace until he had quitted the place.† * See the "Documents concerning the Life and Character of E. Swedenborg," by the Rev. J. H. Smithson. New edition. + See Ferelius, the Swedish clergyman's letter, inserted in this periodical for 1842, p. 476, where it is said :—“ Although Swedenborg went sometimes to the Swedish Church, and afterwards dined with me, or with some other Swede, he And we have no doubt that every sincere worshipper, who has some knowledge of New Church doctrine, feels, under similar circumstances (without being in open communication with spirits), a similar state of uneasiness in his mind, which deprives him of all the rich blessings of a holy worship, and this, especially, when he hears in the sermon, as is frequently the case, the most loathsome and repulsive falsities. In confirmation of what we have here stated, we will adduce the following declaration from Swedenborg's "Brief Exposition of the Doctrine of the New Church :" "The faith of the New Church cannot by any means be together with the faith of the former Church, and that, in case they be together, such a collision and conflict will ensue as to destroy everything relating to the Church in man." (n. 102.) We have not space to adduce what is said in the following number, in confirmation and illustration of this declaration, but we earnestly recommend it to the perusal of our correspondent. As to what is said respecting debts contracted in building places of worship, our correspondent should remember that many of the churches and chapels built in the Church of England, and among the Nonconformists, are liable to a similar occurrence. It is, therefore, not peculiar to places of worship in the New Church, most of which, we believe, are exempt from debt. Nor ought any complaint on this ground to be alleged, when the debt is justly and honourably contracted, and its conditions faithfully observed. EDITOR. Poetry. THE MESSAGE. I cried aloud-" There is no GOD for me!" Vain every effort! Vain alike all prayer! But oft, at times, was heard a still small voice- told us he had no peace in the church, on account of spirits, who contradicted what the preacher said, especially when he spoke of three Persons in the Godhead, which amounted, in reality, to three Gods." With sullen lip and lowering brow, in prayer Jealous, I watched each thought,-each task performed At length a sob-a piteous stream of tears Of kindred blood to one most near to me- 66 Oh, mother, mother, 'tis too hard to die!" Her, too, I pictured, but what words can paint Scarce had she raised her head from off the grave 66 Doing and praying-ever in the act, But lacking warmth of love and charity. This lad had grievous faults, nor few nor light; And some, who thought they knew him best, Whose coarser minds-whose sensual eye could see Only the outer actions of his life These, in their charitable wisdom said ""Twere best the lad's career were thus cut short." But he had virtues many, great, and rare These were the man-the faults but the defects In childhood had been shown. His poor old nurse- The happy tears into her honest eyes; No pride, nor that false shame of youth were his, [Enl. Series.-No. 62, vol. vi.] F And tell her all his hopes and all his plans; Our lost one poured the oil into his wounds, For many such were of his daily life, That never reached beyond the sphere wherein Whose left hand knows not what the right hand does. That easy charity the rich man boasts, Who gives of his abundance, costs no pain They journeyed on together, hand in hand, Poor boy! and thus he stands before the pure, Worked through thy senses, but ne'er reached thy heart. And thus in mercy, for thou wast so weak, The Lord hath snatched thee from their power,-thou'rt free! And for a time 'tis mine, oh, happy task! To teach thee wisdom, and to make thee strong!" The dream was o'er, and I arose subdued, |