 I said I could see no difference between negligence and gross negligence — that it was the same thing, with the addition of a vituperative epithet...  The Law of Contracts - Page 601by Theophilus Parsons - 1857Full view - About this book
 | 1866 - 932 lehte
...Wil-son v. Brett (14), Rolfe, B. said, " I said I could see no difference between negligence and gross negligence ; that it was the same thing, with the addition of a vituperative epithet" [WILLES, J. — In Beal v. the South Devon Railway Company (15), a definition of "gross negligence"... | |
 | Joseph Kinnicut Angell - 1849 - 808 lehte
...same Court, Rolfe, B., remarks, — " I said I could see no difference between negligence and gross negligence — that it was the same thing, with the addition of a vituperative epithet." 3 , § 24. If the subject-matter of the bailment consists of living animals, such as oxen, horses,... | |
 | Joseph Kinnicut Angell - 1851 - 836 lehte
...same Court, Rolfe, B., remarks, — " I said I could see no difference between negligence and gross negligence — that it was the same thing, with the addition of a vituperative epithet." 2 § 24. If the subject-matter of the bailment consists of living animals, such as oxen, horses, or... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court - 1853 - 672 lehte
...& Wels. 113,) Baron Rolfe observes, " that he could see no difference between negligence and gross negligence ; that it was the same thing, with the addition of a vituperative epithet." And see Hare and Wallace's American note, p. 242, with the American cases there cited, and which are... | |
 | John William Smith, John Innes Clark Hare, Horace Binney Wallace, John William Wallace - 1855 - 1006 lehte
...to possess; and ROLFE, В., observes that he could see no difference between négligence and gross negligence, — that it was the same thing, with the addition of a vituperative epithet. See also the remarks of PARKE, В., in Wyld v. Pickford, 8 Id. 443, 461, 462, and of LordUENMAN, CJ,... | |
 | Joseph Story - 1856 - 728 lehte
...Meeson & Welsby, 113, Baron IIolfe declared he could see no difference between negligence and gross negligence ; that it was the same thing, with the addition of a vituperative epithet. And in another case, — Hinton v. Dibbin, 2 Queen's Bench, 650, — Lord Denman said: "It may well... | |
 | Vermont. Supreme Court - 1857 - 904 lehte
...pertinent remarks upon this subject. " I said I could see no difference between negligence and gross negligence, that it was the same thing, with the addition of a vituperative epithet," And in Austin v. The Manchester RR 11 Eng. L. & Eq. 513, Cresswell, J. refers to the language of Lord... | |
 | 1857 - 600 lehte
...pertinent remarks upon this subject. " I said I could see no difference between negligence and grots negligence, that it was the same thing, with the addition of a vituperative epithet." And in Austin r. The Manchester RR 11 Eng. L. & Eq. 513, Cresswell, J., refers to the language of Lord... | |
 | Great Britain. Privy Council. Judicial Committee, Edmund F. Moore - 1864 - 604 lehte
...v. Brett (b), objected to it, saying that he " could see no difference between negligence and gross negligence ; that it was the same thing, with the addition of a vituperative epithet." And this critical observation has been since approved of by other eminent Judges. Of course, if intended... | |
| |
