 В. 719, Maule, J., correctly explains the rule of law. He says: ' There is no presumption in this country that every person knows the law ; it would be contrary to common sense and reason if it were so.  Michigan Reports: Cases Decided in the Supreme Court of Michigan - Page 201by Michigan. Supreme Court, George C. Gibbs, Randolph Manning, Thomas McIntyre Cooley, William Jennison, Elijah W. Meddaugh, Hoyt Post, Hovey K. Clarke, John Adams Brooks, Henry Allen Chaney, Marquis B. Eaton, William Dudley Fuller, James M. Reasoner, Richard W. Cooper, Herschel Bouton Lazell - 1874Full view - About this book
 | 1884 - 550 lehte
...of Reg. v. 0uens(13) would know that he was disqualified. From the knowledge of the fact that B. was mayor and returning officer, was every elector bound...excuse. But I think that in Martindale v. Falkner (Case 7), Maule, J. correctly explains the law." And Lush, J. added : "A maxim has been cited which... | |
 | Nicholas St. John Green - 1879 - 838 lehte
...El. & El. 86, would know that he was disqualified. From the knowledge of the fact that Blizzard was mayor and returning officer, was every elector bound...that he was disqualified ? I agree that ignorance of law does not excuse. But I think that in Martindale v. Fnlkner, 2 CB 719, Mnule, J., correctly explains... | |
 | Francis Wharton - 1880 - 858 lehte
...El. & El. 86, would know that he was disqualified. From the knowledge of the fact that Blizzard was mayor and returning officer, was every elector bound...that he was disqualified? I agree that ignorance of law does not excuse. But I think that in Martindale ». Falkner, 2 С. В. 719, Maule, J., correctly... | |
 | Sir Edward Loughlin O'Malley - 1893 - 916 lehte
...with approval the judgment of Mr. Justice Maule, where the latter, a great common-sense intellect, says: " There is no presumption in this country that every person knows the law, and it would be contrary to common sense and reason if it were so." In that case, which related to... | |
 | John Davison Lawson - 1899 - 820 lehte
...knowledge of the fact that B was mayor and returning officer, "was every elector bound to know as a matter of law that he was disqualified? I agree that...excuse. But I think that in Martindale v. Falkner (Case VIIT. ) , Maulc, J . , correctly explains the law. ' ' And Lush, J. , added: "A maxim has been... | |
 | Indiana. Supreme Court, Charles Frederick Remy, George Washington Self, Philip Zoercher, William H. Adams, Mrs. Edward Franklin White, Emma Mary May - 1906 - 852 lehte
...not supply it. Blackburn, J., uses this language : 'From the knowledge of the fact that Blizard was mayor and returning officer, was every elector bound...ignorance of the law does not excuse. But I think that in Martindate v. Falkner [1846], 2 CB 706, 719, Maule, J., correctly explains the rule of law. He says:... | |
 | 1873 - 964 lehte
...ofReg.v. Owent, would know that he was disqualified. From the knowledge of the fact that Blizard was mayor and returning officer, was every elector bound...does not excuse. But I think that in Martindale v. FaVcner, Maule, J., correctly explains the rule of law. He says : — " There is no presumption in... | |
| |
