Page images
PDF
EPUB

exemption for the Queen's horses and car-
riages]-By the permission of the Queen, one
of her carriages, drawn by her horses and driven
by her coachman, was used by the wife of G,
the Crown Equerry, and was driven through
the toll-gate of W. G.'s wife was in the car-
riage, and was being driven for her own plea-
sure; but G. was not present, nor were the
carriage and horses used on the particular occa-
sion in the discharge of his duty as Crown
Equerry. It was held, the carriage and horses
were exempt from the payment of tolls. West-
over v. Perkins, 227

VARIANCE. See Conviction.

VESTRY. See Poor-Rate.

WARRANT FOR DELIVERY OF GOODS. See Lar-
ceny.

WATCHING AND LIGHTING RATE-wet dock or
tidal basin]-A wet dock or tidal basin is pro-
perty ejusdem generis with houses and buildings

mentioned in the 3 & 4 Will. 4. c. 90. s. 33, and
rateable at the higher amount; but, by Erle, J.,
they are only rateable at the lower amount, as
land. Peto v. West Ham Parish, 240

WEIGHTS AND MEASURES-penalty on inspector
improperly stamping weights]-The words "any
inspector" at the end of section 25. of 5 & 6
Will. 4. c. 63. apply to an inspector appointed
under the provisions of that section, as well as
to an inspector appointed by county Justices;
so that any inspector, however appointed, who
knowingly stamps the weights or measures of a
person residing within the limits of any local
jurisdiction for which another inspector may
have been legally appointed, is liable to a penalty
under that section. R. v. Skelton, 222
WORDS-"Forthwith," 198

"Recovered as damages," 7

"Sewer," 37

"Theretofore," 246

[blocks in formation]
[blocks in formation]

v. Cotton, 22

v. Coventry Canal Co., 102

v. Cudham, Inhabitants of, 105

v. Cunningham (Crown case), 66

v. Durham, Earl of, 232

v. East Hagbourne, Inhabitants of (Crown case), 71

v. Edmundson, 213

v. Essex, Justices of, 22

v. Finnis, 201

v. Fletcher (Crown case), 85

v. Fox, 157

v. Great Western Rail. Co., 59, 246

v. Heaton, Inhabitants of, 181

V.

Hellingley, Inhabitants of, 167

v. Hilton (Crown case), 28

v. Hunslet, Overseers of, 180

v. Kendal, Inhabitants of, 110

v. Lyons (Crown case), 33

v. Middleton, Nuisances Removal Committee of, 41

v. Morrison (Crown case), 210

v. Potterhanworth, Inhabitants of, 56

v. Rice (Crown case), 64

v. Richmond (Crown case), 188

v. Robinson (Crown case), 58

v. Rowe (Crown case), 128

v. St. James, Westminster, Governors of, 172

v. St. Sepulchre, Inhabitants of, 187

v. Sidebotham (Crown case), 189

v. Simmons (Crown case), 183

v. Skeen (Crown case), 91

v. Skelton, 222

v. Skircoat, Inhabitants of, 224

v. Thurlstone, Inhabitants of, 106

v. Warwickshire, Justices of, 249 v. Webster (Crown case), 200

v. West Middlesex Waterworks Co., 135

Spicer v. Barnard, 176

Temple v. Dickinson, 10 Thompson v. Harvey, 163

Vaughan v. Imray, 78

Venables v. Hardman, 33

Viner v. Tonbridge, Churchwardens and Overseers of, 251

Waddington v. City of London Union, Guardians of, (Ex. Ch.), 113

Westover v. Perkins, 227

Wray v. Ellis, 45

[blocks in formation]

Printed by JAMES HOLMES, 4, Took's Court, Chancery Lane.

[blocks in formation]

GEORGE HENRY COOPER, Esq., BARRISTER-AT-LAW.

FROM TRINITY TERM, 1858, TO MICHAELMAS TERM, 1859.

FORMING PART IV. OF

VOL. XXXVII.

NEW SERIES, VOL. XXVIII.

OF

THE LAW JOURNAL REPORTS.

LONDON:

Printed by James Holmes, 4, Took's Court, Chancery Lane,

PUBLISHED BY EDWARD BRET INCE, 5, QUALITY COURT, CHANCERY LANE.

MDCCCLIX.

« EelmineJätka »