 | Michigan. Supreme Court, Randolph Manning, George C. Gibbs, Thomas McIntyre Cooley, Elijah W. Meddaugh, William Jennison, Hovey K. Clarke, Hoyt Post, Henry Allen Chaney, William Dudley Fuller, John Adams Brooks, Marquis B. Eaton, Herschel Bouton Lazell, James M. Reasoner, Richard W. Cooper - 1914 - 828 lehte
...value, see Mears v. Railroad Co., 75 Conn. 171 (52 Atl. 610, 56 LRA 884, 96 Am. St. Rep. 192). That this limitation as to value has no tendency to exempt from liability for negligence, see Baltimore & Ohio R. Co. v. Hubbard, 72 Ohio St. 302 (74 NE 214) ; Alair v. Railroad Co., 53 Minn.... | |
 | 1885 - 544 lehte
...that its value is a less sum than that claimed after a loss. It is just to hold the shipper to his agreement, fairly made, as to value, even where the...based on that value. The shipper is estopped from aayiug that the value is greater. The articles have no greater value for the purposes of the contract... | |
 | 1892 - 582 lehte
...contract under consideration, for, as stated by Blatchford, J., in Hart v. Railroad Co., 112 US 331, 340, "The limitation as to value has no tendency to exempt...It does not induce want of care. It exacts from the carriers the measure of care due to the value agreed on. The carrier is bound to respond in that value... | |
 | 1892 - 554 lehte
...as to value, even where the loss or injury has occurred through the negligence of the carrier. * * * The limitation as to value has no tendency to exempt from liability for negligence. It exacts from the carrier the measure of care due to the value agreed on. The carrier is bound to respond... | |
 | Ohio. Supreme Court - 1905 - 830 lehte
...limit on the amount of liability for which the carrier should respond in case of loss or damage. "This limitation as to value has no tendency to exempt from...liability for negligence. It does not induce want of care. The carrier is bound to respond in that value for negligence. The compensation for carriage is based... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court - 1885 - 844 lehte
...that its value is a less sum than that claimed after a loss. It is just to hold the shipper to his agreement, fairly made, as to value, even where the...The carrier is bound to respond in that value for Opinion of the Court. negligence. The compensation for carriage is based on that value. The shipper... | |
 | 1885 - 544 lehte
...effect of the agreement is to cheapen the freight and secure the carriage, if there ia no loss; aud the effect of disregarding the agreement, after a...the value agreed on. The carrier is bound to respond iu that value for negligence. The compensation for carriage is based on that value. The shipper is... | |
 | 1885 - 1232 lehte
...the agreement, after a loss, is to expose the carrier to a greater risk than the parties intended be should assume. The agreement as to value, in this...value has no tendency to exempt from liability for negrt ligence. It does not induce want of care. It exacts from the carrier the * measure of care due... | |
| |
The limitation as to value has no tendency to exempt from liability for negligence. It does not induce want of care. It exacts from the carrier the measure of care due to the value agreed on. The carrier is bound to respond in that value for Opinion of... 
