Page images
PDF
EPUB

in a whole fentence, where circumstances are happily reconciled that feem wholly foreign to each other; and is often found among the Latin Poets (for the Greeks wanted art for it), in their descriptions of pictures, images, dreams, apparitions, metamorphofes, and the like; where they bring together two fuch thwarting ideas, by making one part of their defcriptions relate to the reprefentation, and the other to the thing that is represented. Of this nature is that verfe, which, perhaps, is the wittieft in Virgil; "Attollens humeris "famamque et fata nepotum," n. viii. where he defcribes Æneas carrying on his fhoulders the reputation and fortunes of his pofterity; which, though very odd and furprizing, is plainly made out, when we confider how these disagreeing ideas are reconciled, and his pofterity's fame and fate made portable by being engraven on the fhield. Thus, when Ovid tells us that Pallas tore in pieces Arachne's work, where the had embroidered all the rapes that the gods had committed, he fays-" Rupit cœleftia crimina," I fhall conclude this tedious reflexion with an excellent stroke of this nature out of Mr. Montague's Poem to the King; where he tells us, how the King of France would have been celebrated by his subjects, if he had ever gained such an honourable wound as King William's at the fight of the Boyne.

**

"His bleeding arm had furnish'd all their rooms, "And run for ever purple in the looms."

*Afterwards Earl of Halifax.

FAB.

FA B. II.

P. I 50. 1. 3. Here Cadmus reign'd.] This is a pretty folemn tranfition to the story of Actæon, which is all naturally told. The goddess and her maids undreffing her, are described with diverting circumftances. Acteon's flight, confufion, and griefs, are paffionately represented; but it is pity the whole narration should be fo carelefly closed up.

-Ut abeffe queruntur,

"Nec capere oblatæ fegnem fpectacula prædæ.

Vellet abeffe quidem, fed adeft, velletque videre, "Non etiam fentire, canum fera facta fuorum.” P. 153. I. 10. A generous pack, &c.] I have not here troubled myself to call over Acteon's pack of dogs in rhyme Spot and Whitefoot make but a mean figure in heroic verfe; and the Greek names Ovid ufes would found a great deal worfe. He clofes up his own catalogue with a kind of a jest on it: "Quofque referre mora eft"-which, by the way, is too light and full of humour for the other serious parts of this story.

but

This way of inferting catalogues of proper names in their Poems, the Latins took from the Greeks ; have made them more pleafing than those they imitate, by adapting fo many delightful characters to their perfons names; in which part Ovid's copiousness of invention, and great insight into nature, has given him the precedence to all the Poets that ever came before or after him. The fmoothnefs of our English

verfe is too much loft by the repetition of proper names, which is otherwise very natural, and absolutely necessary in some cases; as before a battle to raise in our minds an answerable expectation of the events, and a lively idea of the numbers that are engaged. For, had Homer or Virgil only told us in two or three lines before their fights, that there were forty thoufand of each fide, our imagination could not poffibly have been fo affected, as when we fee every leader fingled out, and every regiment in a manner drawn up before our eyes.

FA B. III.

P. 154. 1. 26. How Semele, &c.] This is one of Ovid's finifhed ftories. The tranfition to it is proper and unforced: Juno, in her two speeches, acts incomparably well the parts of a resenting goddess and a tattling nurse Jupiter makes a very majestic figure with his thunder and lightning, but it is still fuch a one as fhews who drew it; for who does not plainly difcover Ovid's hand in the

"Quà tamen ufque poteft, vires fibi demere tentat. "Nec, quo centimanum dejiceret igne Typhœa, "Nunc armatur eo: nimium feritatis in illo. "Eft aliud levius fulmen, cui dextra Cyclopum, "Sævitiæ flammæque minus, minus addidit iræ ; "Tela fecunda vocant fuperi."

P. 155. 1. 26. 'Tis well, fays the, &c.] Virgil has made a Beroë of one of his godde Tes in the Fifth Æneid; but if we compare the speech fhe there makes

with that of her name-fake in this story, we may find the genius of each Poet discovering itself in the language of the nurfe: Virgil's Iris could not have spoken more majestically in her own thape; but Juno is fo much altered from herself in Ovid, that the goddefs is quite loft in the old woman.

F A B. V.

P. 160. 1.9. She can't begin, &c.] If playing on words be excufable in any Poem, it is in this, where Echo is a speaker; but it is fo mean a kind of wit, that, if it deferves excufe, it can claim no more.

Mr. Locke, in his Essay of Human Understanding, has given us the best account of wit in short that can any where be met with. "Wit, fays he, lies in "the assemblage of ideas, and putting those together "with quickness and variety, wherein can be found 66 any refemblance or congruity, thereby to make up "pleasant pictures and agreeable visions in the fancy." Thus does true wit, as this incomparable author obferves, generally confift in the likeness of ideas, and is more or lefs wit, as this likeness in ideas is more furprizing and unexpected. But as true wit is nothing elfe but a fimilitude in ideas, fo is falfe wit the fimilitude in words, whether it lies in the likeness of letters only, as in Anagram and Acroftic; or of Syllables, as in doggrel rhymes; or whole words, as Puns, Echoes, and the like. Befide these two kinds of falfe and true wit, there is another of a middle nature, that has fomething of both in it-when in

twe

two ideas that have some resemblance with each other, and are both expreffed by the fame word, we make use of the ambiguity of the word to speak that of one idea included under it, which is proper to the other. Thus, for example, moft languages have hit on the word, which properly fignifies fire, to exprefs love by (and therefore we may be fure there is fome refemblance in the ideas mankind have of them); from hence the witty Poets of all languages, when they once have called Love a fire, confider it no longer as the paffion, but speak of it under the notion of a real fire; and, as the turn of wit requires, make the fame word in the fame fentence ftand for either of the ideas that is annexed to it. When Ovid's Apollo falls in love, he burns with a new flame; when the SeaNymphs languish with this paffion, they kindle in the water; the Greek Epigrammatist fell in love with one that flung a fnow-ball at him, and therefore takes occafion to admire how fire could be thus concealed in fnow. In short, whenever the Poet feels any thing in this love that resembles fomething in fire, he carries on this agreement into a kind of allegory; but if, as in the preceding inftances, he finds any circumftance in his love contrary to the nature of fire, he calls his love a fire, and by joining this circumftance to it furprizes his reader with a seeming contradiction. I fhould not have dwelt so long on this instance, had it not been fo frequent in Ovid, who is the greatest admirer of this mixt wit of all the ancients, as our Cowley is among the moderns. Homer, Virgil, Ho

[blocks in formation]
« EelmineJätka »