Reports of Cases Argued and Determined in the Supreme Court of the State of Vermont: Reported by the Judges of Said Court, Agreeably to a Statute Law of the State, 183. köideVermont printing Company, 2007 |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 84
Page 531
... plaintiff initially did not complain of any injury other than one to his foot , and that there was no indication of neck or back injuries . Although plain- tiff's physician testified that , in his opin- ion , plaintiff suffered a back ...
... plaintiff initially did not complain of any injury other than one to his foot , and that there was no indication of neck or back injuries . Although plain- tiff's physician testified that , in his opin- ion , plaintiff suffered a back ...
Page 532
... plaintiff's credibility in general . At a hear- ing on the motion two days before trial , defendant argued that he had a right to rebut plaintiff's claim for lost earnings by showing that plaintiff did not report such income , and was ...
... plaintiff's credibility in general . At a hear- ing on the motion two days before trial , defendant argued that he had a right to rebut plaintiff's claim for lost earnings by showing that plaintiff did not report such income , and was ...
Page 562
... plaintiff filed this suit in Lamoille Superior Court , initially alleg- ing only defamation for statements ut- tered by defendant to various third par- ties calling plaintiff a thief and accusing him of embezzling money from Topnotch ...
... plaintiff filed this suit in Lamoille Superior Court , initially alleg- ing only defamation for statements ut- tered by defendant to various third par- ties calling plaintiff a thief and accusing him of embezzling money from Topnotch ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
abuse action admission Affirmed agreement alleged amend appeal apply arbitration argument asserted attorney attorney's fees award child support Cite as 183 claim common law complaint concluded consider contract counsel court erred court found criminal custody damages decision defense of property delay denied determine discretion dismiss district drug employee enforcement error evidence expert fact factors failed family court father federal filed finding granted hearing indemnity Inkels intent interpretation Irving Oil issue jurisdiction juror label landowner language Legislature liability listed value ment mtDNA negligence officer parties person Phenergan plaintiff prejudice protect question quotation omitted reasonable regulation relevant relief remand request responsibilities rule specific speedy trial State's statement statute statutory summary judgment superior court taxpayers testified testimony tion tort Town trial court U.S. Const Vermont Constitution victim violation voir dire Waitsfield waived Windsor witness