« EelmineJätka »
Willats v. Basby-Willats v. Busby—8th Nov.1837 | Crockett v. Crockett 1st Cause-day after Term-Steer v. Wise
Pearce v. Verbeke-12th January, 1839 Day to be fixed by the Attorney-Gen. Attorney- Barnbridge v. Burton
Gen. v. Master of Dulwich College-20th April, Price v. Berrington-14th Jannary, 1839 1838
Hill v. Maurice
Liston v. Sargon-15th January, 1839
Cooke v. Isaac
Dickenson v. Lord Holland Stand over-Warsop v. Scrimshaw—31st May, Aldworth v. Robinson–16th January, 1839 1838
Stevenson v. Smith Attorney-General v. Brooke
Mellish v. Brooks-17th January, 1839 Hilary Term-Attorney General v. Whiteman Ross v. Hafford Ist Cause-day aft. Term-Attorney-Gen v. Bayley Pauper-Roberts v. Lloyd—21st January, 1839 Stand over till mentioned again-Codrington v. Townsend v. Westacott
Johnstone—Johnstone v. Codrington, exceptions Levy v. Pendergrass
Shilcock v. Gregg, at defendant's request
Hughes v. Brigstocke-Lawrence v. Ditto, al re-
Scott v. Cattley Last day of Term-Knowles v. Mount-Ditto v. Bennett v. Fowler, further directions and costs
Ayles-Ditto v. Parkerson-Ditto v. Dittom Walker v. Earl of Abingdon, exceptions, 2 sets, fur. Ditto v. Ditto-Ditto v. Ditto, further directions directions and costs and costs and petition
Martin v. Drinkwater-Ditto v. Darien, exceptions, Stephen v. Wrench, exceptions
two sets, further directions and costs Cole v. Fitzgerald, fur. dirs. & costs & petition Dickonson v. Player, further directions and costs Eaton v. Smith-Ditto v. Ditto-Ditto v. Ditto, Johnson v. Woods-Smith v. Johnson, further further directions and costs
directions and costs Randall v. Stanley, further directions and costs Whitby v. Martin, further directions and costs Carsham v. Newland-Falcon v, Ditto, further Bevan v. Flight directions and costs
Sidmouth v. Sidmouth-Ditto v. Lord Edon Eyre v. Monkland-Ditto v. Everett—Ditto v. Gir. Ankers v. Sandford
dlestone-Ditto v. Everett, fur. dirs. & costs Bolton v. Powell Taylor v. Brown-30 November, 1838
Rhoades v. Cartwright Hayes v. Haward
Sparke v. Mann, exons. fur. dirs. & costs Glew v. Adlard
Ring v. Hardwicke, further directions and costs Nelson v. Bridges
Smith v. Birch-Ditto v. Ditto, erceptions Cullingworth v. Loyd
Hoggard v. Clark, further directions and costs Maw v. Hill
Filder v. Bellingham, at defendant's request Stubbs v. Liston
Parlby v. Gilmore—Ditto v. Tyler Farmer v. Dumelow-6th November, 1838 Seaber v. Harlock, fur, dirs. costs & petn. 1st Cause-day of Term.-Ray v. Giles—Giles v. Flashman v. Powell—Ditto v. Ditto-Bruen v. Ray
Ditto, further directions and costs Stand over-Stead v. Nelson
Heighington v. Grant-Ditto v. HeighingtonF. Palmer v. Lord Kensington-Ditto v. Walsh Ditto v. Grant, erceptions Wilson v. Mead—7th November, 1838
Smith v. Birch-Ditto v. Ditto, fur, dirs. & costs Drake v. Drake
Borrell v. Dann, exceptions Farball v. Farhall--10th November, 1838
Green v. Challenor, further directions and costs Wormald v. Mackintosh-Ditto v. Ditto, exons. Johnston v. Todd-Ditto v. Ditto-Ditto v. Ditto, and further directions and costs
exceptions, further directions and costs Curtis v. Holcombe, exceptions
Biease v. Burgh, further directions and costs Baring v. Bordelins—12th November, 1838 Barlow v. Sewell - 15th April, 1839 Passingbam v. Sherborn
Martin v. Swannell, further directions and costs Bebb v. Beckwith, further directions and costs Cole v. Dawson-Ditto v. Ditto, fur. dirs. & costs Larkins v. Paxton, further directions and costs Cockell v. Pugh, further directions and costs Whitaker v. Ferrand
Moore v. Painter— 16th April, 1839 Attorney-Gen. V. Johnson-Pride v. Fooks—Ditto Tylee v. Stace
v. Knott-Ditto v. Fowler-Ditto v. Ditto-Griffin v. Griffin
Ditto v. Ditto, further directions and costs Attorney General v. Lister Lewin v. Moline
Cantrell v. Sutton Franks v. Price, further directions and costs
Gater v. Clive-Ditto v. Fenton—18th April, 1839 Evans v. Brown, further directions and costs Smith v. Langford Davies v. Hopkins, further directions and costs Wainewright v. Hardisty Hodgson v. Charlton, further directions and costs Stocken v. Harbin Pullan v. Manning, further directions and costs Wade v. Cox- 19th April, 1839 Hopkins v. Hopkins—Ratcliffe v. Ditto, further Mills v. Hudson, at deft.'s Chambers and Hick's req. directions and costs
Hoggart v. Cutts Cooper v. Waldegrave, exceptions and petitions Suckermore v. Dimes Evans v. Thomas, at request of defendants T'imothy Attorney General v. Bosanquet---20th April, 1839 and Wife
Skipworth v. Skipworth
Howard v. Harrison, at defendant's request
Moscrop v. Doughney, further directions & costs Robinson v. Addison-Ditto v. Robinson-SubAttorney-Gen. v. Kerr-Ditto v.Wales—10th May, pæna notes returnable, July 12, 1839 1839
Lichfield v. Baker, fur. dirs. & costs--Set down Palmer v. Wakefield, further directions and costs June 26, 1839 Davies v. Davies—17th May, 1839
Montgomery v. Calland— Ditto v. Patrick-EdBater v. Webber, further directions and costs
wards v. Ditto, erons.-Set down, July 4, 1839 Gordon v. Hendrie, erceptions
Baily–Subpæna notes returnable, July Cotham v. West, erceptions
22, 1839 Williams v. Bown-230 May, 1839
Butler v. Bushnell-Ditto v. Ditto-Ditto v. Young Neale v. Samples, at request of defendant Hunt -Bushnell v. Bushnell-Ditto v. Ditto-further Styles v. Styles
directions and costs and supplemental bill-Set Boyle v. Irby
down, July 10, 1839 Jackson v. Ernst
First Cause-day-Hall v. Lewis-Set down, July Knight v. Frampton-Set down, May 24, 1839. 12, 1839 Short-Stand over to amend-Aldrick v. Cockbarn Woodcock v. Renneck-Set down, July 13, 1839 Artis v. Artis
First day of Causes-Davies v. Gatacre, and petition Webb v. Stait-Set down, May 25, 1839
Set down July 18, 1839 Bailey v. Earle
Beasant v. Clare, erceptions and further directions Attorney-General v. Sadlers' Company
and costs--Set down, July 19, 1839 Saunders v. Howell
Short-Collins v. Johnson-Ditto v. Ditto-Ditto Pyke v. Northwood
v. Smith-Ditto v. Bennett, further directions and Maher v. Burn-Set down, May 27, 1839
costs-Set down, August 3, 1839 Brooks v. Cooper
Short-Stand over-Noble v. Noble, further direcAttorney-General v. Stevens
tions and costs-Set down, August 5, 1839 Staile v. Palsgrave
Hardwicke v. Richardson-Ditto v. Ditto-Ditto Brandon v. Woodthorpe-Subpæna notes return- v. Jones, further directions and costs—Set down,
able, May 28, 1839-Set down, May 28, 1839 August 5, 1839 Mayston v. Clark
Salmon v. Jones-Ditto v. Salmon-further direcBarton v. Chambers
tions and costs-Set down, August 6, 1839 Lewis v. Deere-Lewis v. Thomas-Subpæna Montresor v. Montresor, further directions and costs notes returnable, May 29, 1839
Set down, August 7, 1839 Tyler v. Tyler
Rycraft v. Christy, further directions and costs—Set Ellis v. Griffiths-Ditto v. Carps
down, August 8, 1839 Rudall v. Barry-Subpoena notes returnable, Hotham v. Somerville—Ditto v. Ditto, further diJune 7, 1839
rections and costs—Set down, August 8, 1839 Lord Suffield v. Reed-Subpæna notes returnable, Robertson v. Crawford, exceptions and further diJune 7, 1839
rections and costs-Set down, August 8, 1839 Kellaway v. Johnson-Subpæna notes returnable, Stevens v. Webb—Ditto v. Nash—Ditto v. Hards, June 17, 1839
fur. dirs, and costs—Set down, August 16, 1839 Sheppard v. Sheppard-Ditto v. Ditto-Ditto v. Serjeant v. Treves, further directions and custs-Set Ditto-Ditto v. Ditto, fur. directions & costs
down, August 19, 1839 Set down, May 28, 1839
Davis v. Davies, further directions and costs-Set Attorney-Gen. v. Brickdale, fur. dirs. & costs
down, August 23, 1839 Set down, May 29, 1839
Goodenough v. Tremamondo, further directions and Beasant v. Clare, esons.-Set down, May 30, 1839
costs---Set down, August 24, 1839
Young v. Powys
Morgan v. Morgan
James y, James
Tuesday the 5th November
Reeve v. Cann
Corbett v. Corbett Set down, June 12, 1839
Sark v. Upton, at request of defendant Smith Wild v.Hardy-Sub. notes returnable,June 28,1839
Barnard v. Pomfret Carter v. Bentall-Ditto v. Mendham, further
Wednesday the 6th directions and costs-Set down, June 12, 1839 Whittle v. Heming-Subpæna notes returnable,
Stephens v. Stephens June 29, 1839
Cless v. Humphries King v. Hammett-Subpæna notes returnable,
Prentice v. Fairbrass July 10, 1839
Shepherd v. Morris Ist day of Causes.-Jones v. Maurice-Davies v.
Thursday the 7th November
Crosswell v. Lord Kensington Benbow v. Curling-Ditto v. Francis-Subpæna notes returnable, July 13, 1839
Tuesday the 12th Attorney-Gen. v. Mayor of Leicester-Subpæna
The Registrar's duy. notes returnable, July 16, 1839 Attorney-Gen. v. Coopers' Company–Subpæna
Wednesday the 13th notes returnable, July 9, 1839
The Master of the Rolls Day. Attorney-Gen. v. Miller-Subpauda notes return
Attorney Gen. v. Towle able, July 16, 1839
Gloucester Baylis v. Lawrence-w. Alerander
· Taylor v. Sheldon-Kelly
Fereday—R. V. Richards
Lancaster Connell, one of the Public Officers,
&c. v. Sawyer & ors., sued with after Trinity Term, 1839.
Price-Sir W. w. Follett
Connell, on behalf of the Northern & Michaelmas Term, 1837.
Central Bank of England, v. Price, Cornwall . . Magor and others v. Chadwick and
sued with others-Alexander others-Bompas, Serjt.
Reynolds, one of the Public Officers. Hilary Term, 1838.
&c. v. Robinson & another-Sir London, Trueman and others v. Loder-Sir
W. W. Follett
Hartley v. Wharton-Alexander
Leadbitter v. Hart- Cresswell
Bamford v.Shuttleworth &ors.--Same Middlesex . . Merry and another v. Chapman, Esq. Cumberland . The Queen v. Inhabitants of MaryKelly
port-Same Lancaster Humble v. Mitchell, sen. Alexander Northumberland : M'Clure v. Fraser-Same
Doe on the several dems. of NicholGreenough v. Orrell & ors.-Cresswell
son & ors. y. Welford-Cresswell Broadbent v. Ledward-Wightman
Nottingham . Christie, assignee, &c. v. Unwin & Straker v. Oram-Same
another-Goulburn, Serjt. Chester Meegh v. Clinton-Kelly
Warwick . . The Queen v. Geo. F. Muntze and Doe dem. of Cope and others v. Hill
others-Wilde, Serjt. Esq. and others-J. Jervis
Bosanquet & ors. v.Seaton-Hamfrey Silvester v. Walker-Welsby
Derby Doe on the dem. of Sanforth v. Bel. Cooke v. Walker-Welsby
field and another-Balguy Montgomery Pugh v. Griffith, Esq.-J. Jervis
Cornwall . . Carne & ors. v. Street-Bompas, Serjt. Evans & ors. v. Jones & an.-Same
Somerset Fox, administrator, &c. v. Waters Sussex Doe dem. Millward and another y.
& anor. exors., &c.-Crowder
Skeate v. Beale-Erle
Podmore v. Lawrence, clerk-Same
clerk & ors.-Attorney General Monmouth James v. Phelps-Talourd, Serjt.
Carmarthen. Evans v. Rees, Esq.-Chilton
Davies v. Stacey & anor.—Evans
Hilary Term, 1839.
Middlesex The Queen v. Sarah Virrier-SteGloucester Cole v. Cresswell-A. V. Richards
phen, Serjt. Trinity Term, 1838.
Sims, administratrix, &c. v. Thomas, Middlesex Willis v. Bennett-Attorney General
Ladd v. Thomas & anor.-Platt
Smyth v. Boards--Theobald
London Poole v. Crowder & anor.--Atl. Gen. London Brown and others v. Blakiston-At
Geary v. Harvey, Esq., M.P.-Same torney General
The Birmingham, Bristol, & Thames Allen, a pauper, v. Flicker & anor.
Junction Railway Company v.
Locke—Sir W. W. Follett
Hey v. Wyche-Same
Lady Tufton & anor, v. Whitmore
Sadler & ors. y. Whitmore & ors.London . . Rothschild v. Currie-Sir F. Pollock
Bracey v. Carter-Kelly
Abrahams v. Skinner-J. Jervis
Hart v. Crowley-Platt
Easter Term 1839.
Middlesex , Edan v. Dudfield-Kelly
The Aylesbury Railway Company v. Nicholls v. Baker-Kelly
Thompson--Same Bedford. The Queen v. Inhabitants of Bar
Delisser v. Towne-Same
Lynch an infant v. Nurdin-Same
Hawkins v. Paxton-Erle
Doedem. of Ivev.Scott & an. J. Jervis
Milligan v. Wedge-Humfrey
Bennett exors. v. Burton, clerk-
London Boorman & ors. v. Brown--Altorney
London Thompson & Ors. exors. &c. v. / York Bacon v. Smith & anr. assignees &c.
COURT IN BANCO.
For Michaelmas Term, 1839.
Wilton, Gent., one, &c. v. Chambers Leicester Knight v. Mc. Dowall & ors. (in re
Utterton v. Castledine plevin)--Hill
Surrey · · The Queen v. Steward of Manor of Northampton Doe d. Norton & ors. v. Webster
Carnarvon The Queen v. Christopher Alderson Nottingham Williams Wo. executrix, &c. v. Fos
and others brooke-White
Bottrell v. Wordsworth and another Sussex. Adnam v. Thompson—Thesiger Carinarthen The Queen v. The Mayor, &c. of Boyce v. Ogle-Platt
Bristol The Queen v. W.L. T. Pyle Taunton Hertford White v. Donald-Thesiger
Glamorgan . The Queen v. The Mayor, &c. of Gloucester Doe d. Allen & anr. Allen & another
In the matter of Wm. Willis, Genl.,
one, &c. and William Allen Talfourd Serjt.
Norfolk ... The Queen v. Sarah Gamble & anr. Hoare v. Scott-Godson
Bailey, Esq. v. Bond and others Salop Smith v. Stanley-Talfourd, Serjt. Derbyshire . The Queen v. The Churchwardens of Lead v. Summers—R. V. Richards
Edlaston Monmouth Doe d. Thomas v. Beynon-Car- Totnes The Queen v. Wm. Price rington
The Queen v. Wm. Hobbarton Chester. The Mayor Alderman and Burgesses
The Queen v. Jaspar Parrott
Sparkes y. Mayo
England The Queen v. William Batchelor Chester Bunting v. Barlow J. Jervis
Brownlow and others Radnor. Doe d. of Crowther v. Drew—J. Middlesex . . The Queen v. Commercial Railway Evans
Company Carmarthen Jones v. Downman-Same
Bedfordshire The Queen v. The Trustees of the Cardigan Jones v. Jones (in replevin) —Chilton
The Queen v. The Guardians of Norfolk King v. Burrell- Attorney General
ors. v. Amey-Analeews
Goddard v. Trevannion and another Surfolk Doe d. Garrod v. Olley & anr.-Kelly Lancaster . . The Queen v. Woodburn PostlethBucks Doe d. Farmer the elder v. Howe
Liverpool . . The Queen v. Thomas Harvey Lancaster . Haigh & anr. v. Brooks - Cresswell
Pitt v. Goodinge, Gent., one, &c. Bayley, Gent, one &c.v.Ashton-Same Dorset . . The Queen v. The Tithe CommisThe Queen v. Sharp- Alexander
sioners of England and Wales Lancaster . Ridgway & ors. v. Ewbank & anr.- Bedfordshire The Queen v. The Justices of BedW. H. Watson
Tomlin v. Bowskill-Alerander Lancaster . . The Queen v. John Harrison
row on Sea
others The Queen v. Stamper & anr.-Bliss Yorkshire . . The Queen v. The Trustees of the Northumberland;
Doncaster and Selby Roads Stephenson v. Stainthorpe-- Alexander Stafford . . The Queen r. The Poor Law ComTown and County of Newcastle :
missioners (Alstonfield IncorporaGibson v. Kirk-Mathews
tion) Camberland . Martindale v. Smith-Dundas
In the matter of Wm. Robert DodDorset Yeatinan clerk v. Dashwood, clk to
son and others trustees &c.-Bompas Serjt.
Knight v. M‘Dowall & ors., in repln. Cornwall . Powning v. Leach & anr.-Same
Same v. Same, in replevin Somerset. The Queen v. Walter Irvine-Erle
Scruton v. Taylor and another
Lancaster . . The Queen (on prosecution of Brooks Trinity Term, 1839.
and others) v. The Sheffield, AshMiddlesex . Dixon v. Thompson, sued &c.-Erle
ton-under-Lyne, and Manchester Banks v. Rough, sued &c.—Kelly
The Queen (on prosecution of the
devisees under the will of G.
Legh, Esq.) . The Same
Wood & E.-Bryant v. Sir James Arthur, dem.
Abrahams-Benjamin v. Belcher, dem.
Smart & B.-Doed. Riddell Wo.v. Gwinnell, special
(case Gibbs y, Trevanion and another Baltye & Co.-Guardians of the Poor of the BanSame v. Same
bury Union v. Robinson, dem. Warwickshire : The Queen v. The Birmingham Few 8.Co.-Lloyd v. Pierce and others (in replevin) Canal Company
dem. Gloucester .. The Queen v. John Harris
Vandercom &. Co. - Drewe v. Lainson, Esq. and
[in error Gore-Tomson v. Lanyon, dem.
Bignold— Doe D. Park and wife v. Kirby, spe. case Same v. Savage—in error
Dean--Walmsley and another v. Cooper, dem. Same v. Gibbs-in error
Wiliamson & H.- Tindall v. Hepton and wife, Lancaster . . The Queen v. The Jusitces of Lanca- executrix, &c. dem.
shire-appointment of overseers Anderton & S.-Doe D. Blight v. Pett, special case
Battye & Co.-The Guardians of the Poor of the
pany v. Willis and others, special case
ter of Edw. Littledale and another Carrett—Lawrie v. Francis, dem. Dorsetshire . The Queon v. The Trustees of Harn- Coode & B.--Robins and others v. May, dem. ham Roads
Frankham & D.--Joyce v. Clarke & Goswick, dem. Salop .... The Queen v. The Priors Ditton In- Monkhouse-Read y. F. Wront, sued with ano. dem. closure Commissioners
Jones-Guppy v. Luxton, assignee, dem.
matter of Alfred Leigh and another Tilsons & Co.—Mayor, &c. of London v. Woolvet, York The Queen v. The Mayor &c. of York dem. Middlesex . . The Queen v. The Commercial Rail- | Webber-Holmes v. Clifton, Esq., dem. way Company
Harmer 8. S.-Curtis y. Hickes, dem.
Dartmouth, special verdict
Hodgson-Davis v. Holding, dem.
shire, (appointment of Overseers Lambert & B.-Hatch v. Trayes, dem.
Smith 8. 5.—Whittaker v. Lloyd, dem.
Bicknell & Co.-- Doe dem, of Blewett, otherwise Middlesex .. The Queen v. The Justices of Mid- called &c. Phillips, special case.
dlesex, (St. Pancras appeal) Blower 8.V.-Greenslade and ors. v. Perry, dem. The Queen v. The Same, sitting at Lever-Smales v. Tyerman, dem. Hatton Garden Office
Aillington & Co.-Doe D. Batchellor v. Ramey, dem Ord and another v. Barrow and ano. Pearson-- Yeatman, clk. v. Dashwood, clk. dem. Hunter v. Hicks
Gough- Bloor and anor. v. Cox and anor., dem.
Edwards-Kirk v. Thompson, den.
Batty-Beaumont v. Pope, dem.
Bignold & Co.- Bignold and others v. Parken and
Lewis-Whyte, administrator, &c. in person y.
Plumptree-Hawthorn and others, assignees, &c.
v. The Newcastle-upon-Tyne & North Shields Thackthwaite v. Sinclair Doe several dems of Haworth and Lane-Lane v. Chapman, dem.
Railway Company, special case
Billing-Cleaton the younger v. Busby, dem.
Coull v. Hall and another
Palmer & Co.-Children v. Mannering, dem.
Swain & Co-Rogers v. Norman, dem.
Faulkner-Bottrell v. Wordsworth, dem.
Palmer & Co.-Doe d. Lord Grantley v. Butcher Cheshire . The Queen v. Justices of Chester
and others, special case Ipswich The Queen v. William Bullar
Walker-Emms v. Cole, dem, Hants. The Queen v. The Lord and Steward Olive-Dempsey v. Homfray, dem. of the Manor of Bishops Stoke
Jenings & T.-Littler v. Thomson, dem. Suffolk The Queen v. The Justices of Suffolk WathenDowell v. Hodgson, Esq. & anor., dem. SECOND DAY.
Acton-Savory, ass. &c. v. Chapman, Esq., dem. Doe dem. of Mobbs y. Roe
Armstrong--Hasledon & anor. v. Almond, dem. Doe several dems. of Mudd and an- Starling-Liddle v. Brownson, dem. other v. Roe
Chisholm & Co.-Strachan, assignee, v. Thomas,
Trail-Bayntun v. Bayntun, dem.
Beetholme-White v. Ruby, dlem.
Flower—Friend who sued, &c. v. Butterfield, den. E, Chester-Archbishop of York and others v.
Dale-Bowler v. Nicholson, dem.
[verdict Trafford and others, special case Lambert-Ramsay v. Nomabell, (in replevin) dem.'.Young & S.-Doe d. Sabin & ors. v. Sabin, special