Page images
PDF
EPUB
[blocks in formation]

Willats v. Basby-Willats v. Busby—8th Nov.1837 | Crockett v. Crockett 1st Cause-day after Term-Steer v. Wise

Pearce v. Verbeke-12th January, 1839 Day to be fixed by the Attorney-Gen. Attorney- Barnbridge v. Burton

Gen. v. Master of Dulwich College-20th April, Price v. Berrington-14th Jannary, 1839 1838

Hill v. Maurice
Baker v. Harwood

Liston v. Sargon-15th January, 1839
Stand over till Hilary Term next-Western v. Sweeting v. Hellard
Williams, further directions and costs

Cooke v. Isaac
Lane v. Hardwicke-30th April, 1838

Dickenson v. Lord Holland Stand over-Warsop v. Scrimshaw—31st May, Aldworth v. Robinson–16th January, 1839 1838

Stevenson v. Smith Attorney-General v. Brooke

Mellish v. Brooks-17th January, 1839 Hilary Term-Attorney General v. Whiteman Ross v. Hafford Ist Cause-day aft. Term-Attorney-Gen v. Bayley Pauper-Roberts v. Lloyd—21st January, 1839 Stand over till mentioned again-Codrington v. Townsend v. Westacott

Johnstone—Johnstone v. Codrington, exceptions Levy v. Pendergrass
tions and further directions and costs

Shilcock v. Gregg, at defendant's request
Hicks v. Keat-Ditto v. Groom-Stockham v. Colebrooke v. Williamson
Keat, exceptions

Hughes v. Brigstocke-Lawrence v. Ditto, al re-
Hemming v. Pinkerton, erons. fur, dirs. & costs quest of defendants
Miller v. Little-Ditto v. Lawrance-Ditto v. Sid-Gaunt v. Taylor, further directions and costs
engham, further directions and costs

Scott v. Cattley Last day of Term-Knowles v. Mount-Ditto v. Bennett v. Fowler, further directions and costs

Ayles-Ditto v. Parkerson-Ditto v. Dittom Walker v. Earl of Abingdon, exceptions, 2 sets, fur. Ditto v. Ditto-Ditto v. Ditto, further directions directions and costs and costs and petition

Martin v. Drinkwater-Ditto v. Darien, exceptions, Stephen v. Wrench, exceptions

two sets, further directions and costs Cole v. Fitzgerald, fur. dirs. & costs & petition Dickonson v. Player, further directions and costs Eaton v. Smith-Ditto v. Ditto-Ditto v. Ditto, Johnson v. Woods-Smith v. Johnson, further further directions and costs

directions and costs Randall v. Stanley, further directions and costs Whitby v. Martin, further directions and costs Carsham v. Newland-Falcon v, Ditto, further Bevan v. Flight directions and costs

Sidmouth v. Sidmouth-Ditto v. Lord Edon Eyre v. Monkland-Ditto v. Everett—Ditto v. Gir. Ankers v. Sandford

dlestone-Ditto v. Everett, fur. dirs. & costs Bolton v. Powell Taylor v. Brown-30 November, 1838

Rhoades v. Cartwright Hayes v. Haward

Sparke v. Mann, exons. fur. dirs. & costs Glew v. Adlard

Ring v. Hardwicke, further directions and costs Nelson v. Bridges

Smith v. Birch-Ditto v. Ditto, erceptions Cullingworth v. Loyd

Hoggard v. Clark, further directions and costs Maw v. Hill

Filder v. Bellingham, at defendant's request Stubbs v. Liston

Parlby v. Gilmore—Ditto v. Tyler Farmer v. Dumelow-6th November, 1838 Seaber v. Harlock, fur, dirs. costs & petn. 1st Cause-day of Term.-Ray v. Giles—Giles v. Flashman v. Powell—Ditto v. Ditto-Bruen v. Ray

Ditto, further directions and costs Stand over-Stead v. Nelson

Heighington v. Grant-Ditto v. HeighingtonF. Palmer v. Lord Kensington-Ditto v. Walsh Ditto v. Grant, erceptions Wilson v. Mead—7th November, 1838

Smith v. Birch-Ditto v. Ditto, fur, dirs. & costs Drake v. Drake

Borrell v. Dann, exceptions Farball v. Farhall--10th November, 1838

Green v. Challenor, further directions and costs Wormald v. Mackintosh-Ditto v. Ditto, exons. Johnston v. Todd-Ditto v. Ditto-Ditto v. Ditto, and further directions and costs

exceptions, further directions and costs Curtis v. Holcombe, exceptions

Biease v. Burgh, further directions and costs Baring v. Bordelins—12th November, 1838 Barlow v. Sewell - 15th April, 1839 Passingbam v. Sherborn

Martin v. Swannell, further directions and costs Bebb v. Beckwith, further directions and costs Cole v. Dawson-Ditto v. Ditto, fur. dirs. & costs Larkins v. Paxton, further directions and costs Cockell v. Pugh, further directions and costs Whitaker v. Ferrand

Moore v. Painter— 16th April, 1839 Attorney-Gen. V. Johnson-Pride v. Fooks—Ditto Tylee v. Stace

v. Knott-Ditto v. Fowler-Ditto v. Ditto-Griffin v. Griffin

Ditto v. Ditto, further directions and costs Attorney General v. Lister Lewin v. Moline

Cantrell v. Sutton Franks v. Price, further directions and costs

Gater v. Clive-Ditto v. Fenton—18th April, 1839 Evans v. Brown, further directions and costs Smith v. Langford Davies v. Hopkins, further directions and costs Wainewright v. Hardisty Hodgson v. Charlton, further directions and costs Stocken v. Harbin Pullan v. Manning, further directions and costs Wade v. Cox- 19th April, 1839 Hopkins v. Hopkins—Ratcliffe v. Ditto, further Mills v. Hudson, at deft.'s Chambers and Hick's req. directions and costs

Hoggart v. Cutts Cooper v. Waldegrave, exceptions and petitions Suckermore v. Dimes Evans v. Thomas, at request of defendants T'imothy Attorney General v. Bosanquet---20th April, 1839 and Wife

Skipworth v. Skipworth
Peach v. Evans, exceptions

Howard v. Harrison, at defendant's request
.Bates v. Bonner, further directions and costs Tanner v. Dancey
Raikes v. Boulton, further directions and costs Merridew v. Woodward—25th April, 1839

[blocks in formation]

Moscrop v. Doughney, further directions & costs Robinson v. Addison-Ditto v. Robinson-SubAttorney-Gen. v. Kerr-Ditto v.Wales—10th May, pæna notes returnable, July 12, 1839 1839

Lichfield v. Baker, fur. dirs. & costs--Set down Palmer v. Wakefield, further directions and costs June 26, 1839 Davies v. Davies—17th May, 1839

Montgomery v. Calland— Ditto v. Patrick-EdBater v. Webber, further directions and costs

wards v. Ditto, erons.-Set down, July 4, 1839 Gordon v. Hendrie, erceptions

Bastard v.

Baily–Subpæna notes returnable, July Cotham v. West, erceptions

22, 1839 Williams v. Bown-230 May, 1839

Butler v. Bushnell-Ditto v. Ditto-Ditto v. Young Neale v. Samples, at request of defendant Hunt -Bushnell v. Bushnell-Ditto v. Ditto-further Styles v. Styles

directions and costs and supplemental bill-Set Boyle v. Irby

down, July 10, 1839 Jackson v. Ernst

First Cause-day-Hall v. Lewis-Set down, July Knight v. Frampton-Set down, May 24, 1839. 12, 1839 Short-Stand over to amend-Aldrick v. Cockbarn Woodcock v. Renneck-Set down, July 13, 1839 Artis v. Artis

First day of Causes-Davies v. Gatacre, and petition Webb v. Stait-Set down, May 25, 1839

Set down July 18, 1839 Bailey v. Earle

Beasant v. Clare, erceptions and further directions Attorney-General v. Sadlers' Company

and costs--Set down, July 19, 1839 Saunders v. Howell

Short-Collins v. Johnson-Ditto v. Ditto-Ditto Pyke v. Northwood

v. Smith-Ditto v. Bennett, further directions and Maher v. Burn-Set down, May 27, 1839

costs-Set down, August 3, 1839 Brooks v. Cooper

Short-Stand over-Noble v. Noble, further direcAttorney-General v. Stevens

tions and costs-Set down, August 5, 1839 Staile v. Palsgrave

Hardwicke v. Richardson-Ditto v. Ditto-Ditto Brandon v. Woodthorpe-Subpæna notes return- v. Jones, further directions and costs—Set down,

able, May 28, 1839-Set down, May 28, 1839 August 5, 1839 Mayston v. Clark

Salmon v. Jones-Ditto v. Salmon-further direcBarton v. Chambers

tions and costs-Set down, August 6, 1839 Lewis v. Deere-Lewis v. Thomas-Subpæna Montresor v. Montresor, further directions and costs notes returnable, May 29, 1839

Set down, August 7, 1839 Tyler v. Tyler

Rycraft v. Christy, further directions and costs—Set Ellis v. Griffiths-Ditto v. Carps

down, August 8, 1839 Rudall v. Barry-Subpoena notes returnable, Hotham v. Somerville—Ditto v. Ditto, further diJune 7, 1839

rections and costs—Set down, August 8, 1839 Lord Suffield v. Reed-Subpæna notes returnable, Robertson v. Crawford, exceptions and further diJune 7, 1839

rections and costs-Set down, August 8, 1839 Kellaway v. Johnson-Subpæna notes returnable, Stevens v. Webb—Ditto v. Nash—Ditto v. Hards, June 17, 1839

fur. dirs, and costs—Set down, August 16, 1839 Sheppard v. Sheppard-Ditto v. Ditto-Ditto v. Serjeant v. Treves, further directions and custs-Set Ditto-Ditto v. Ditto, fur. directions & costs

down, August 19, 1839 Set down, May 28, 1839

Davis v. Davies, further directions and costs-Set Attorney-Gen. v. Brickdale, fur. dirs. & costs

down, August 23, 1839 Set down, May 29, 1839

Goodenough v. Tremamondo, further directions and Beasant v. Clare, esons.-Set down, May 30, 1839

costs---Set down, August 24, 1839
Hamer v. Hickman-Ditto v. Richards-Subpæna
notes returnable, June 15

New Causes.
Page v. Broom-Ditto v. Page-Ditto v. Hams-
Ditto v. Edwards-Ditto v. Ganderton, esons

Young v. Powys

Morgan v. Morgan
Set down, June 6, 1839

James y, James
Buswell v. Underwood-Subpæna notes returnable,
June 26, 1839

Tuesday the 5th November
Wilkins v. Stevens-Ditto v. Ditto-Ditto v.
Ditto-Ditto v. Ditto-Ditto v. Cornwell-

Reeve v. Cann
Ditto v. Ditto-Ditto F. Hawkins, exons.-

Corbett v. Corbett Set down, June 12, 1839

Sark v. Upton, at request of defendant Smith Wild v.Hardy-Sub. notes returnable,June 28,1839

Barnard v. Pomfret Carter v. Bentall-Ditto v. Mendham, further

Wednesday the 6th directions and costs-Set down, June 12, 1839 Whittle v. Heming-Subpæna notes returnable,

Stephens v. Stephens June 29, 1839

Cless v. Humphries King v. Hammett-Subpæna notes returnable,

Prentice v. Fairbrass July 10, 1839

Shepherd v. Morris Ist day of Causes.-Jones v. Maurice-Davies v.

Dixon v.

Marson
Ditto-Subpæna notes returnable, July 6, 1839
Buckmaster s. Rothrey-Set down, June 18

Thursday the 7th November
Gilbertson v. Webster-Ditto v. Ditto, further Cheveley v. Cheveley
directions and costs-Set down, June 20, 1839

Crosswell v. Lord Kensington Benbow v. Curling-Ditto v. Francis-Subpæna notes returnable, July 13, 1839

Tuesday the 12th Attorney-Gen. v. Mayor of Leicester-Subpæna

The Registrar's duy. notes returnable, July 16, 1839 Attorney-Gen. v. Coopers' Company–Subpæna

Wednesday the 13th notes returnable, July 9, 1839

The Master of the Rolls Day. Attorney-Gen. v. Miller-Subpauda notes return

Attorney Gen. v. Towle able, July 16, 1839

[blocks in formation]

.

.

.

[ocr errors]

.

[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]

Hants.

.

Queen's Bench

Gloucester Baylis v. Lawrence-w. Alerander

Stafford
Michaelmas Term, 3d Victoria, 1839.

· Taylor v. Sheldon-Kelly
Worcester Doe dem. of Hartwright & others v.

Fereday—R. V. Richards
NEW TRIALS

Lancaster Connell, one of the Public Officers,
Remaining undetermined at the end of the Sittings

&c. v. Sawyer & ors., sued with after Trinity Term, 1839.

Price-Sir W. w. Follett

Connell, on behalf of the Northern & Michaelmas Term, 1837.

Central Bank of England, v. Price, Cornwall . . Magor and others v. Chadwick and

sued with others-Alexander others-Bompas, Serjt.

Reynolds, one of the Public Officers. Hilary Term, 1838.

&c. v. Robinson & another-Sir London, Trueman and others v. Loder-Sir

W. W. Follett
F. Pollock

Hartley v. Wharton-Alexander
Rawlins v. Desborough-Wilde, Serjt.

Leadbitter v. Hart- Cresswell
Easter Term, 1838.

Bamford v.Shuttleworth &ors.--Same Middlesex . . Merry and another v. Chapman, Esq. Cumberland . The Queen v. Inhabitants of MaryKelly

port-Same Lancaster Humble v. Mitchell, sen. Alexander Northumberland : M'Clure v. Fraser-Same

Doe on the several dems. of NicholGreenough v. Orrell & ors.-Cresswell

son & ors. y. Welford-Cresswell Broadbent v. Ledward-Wightman

Nottingham . Christie, assignee, &c. v. Unwin & Straker v. Oram-Same

another-Goulburn, Serjt. Chester Meegh v. Clinton-Kelly

Warwick . . The Queen v. Geo. F. Muntze and Doe dem. of Cope and others v. Hill

others-Wilde, Serjt. Esq. and others-J. Jervis

Bosanquet & ors. v.Seaton-Hamfrey Silvester v. Walker-Welsby

Derby Doe on the dem. of Sanforth v. Bel. Cooke v. Walker-Welsby

field and another-Balguy Montgomery Pugh v. Griffith, Esq.-J. Jervis

Cornwall . . Carne & ors. v. Street-Bompas, Serjt. Evans & ors. v. Jones & an.-Same

Somerset Fox, administrator, &c. v. Waters Sussex Doe dem. Millward and another y.

& anor. exors., &c.-Crowder
Wood-Andrews, Serjt.

Skeate v. Beale-Erle
Rawlinson v. Elliott-Channell

Podmore v. Lawrence, clerk-Same
Surrey Mills v. Claridge, Knt. & ors.-Platt Devon . F. Atkins v. Kilby & anor.-Crowder
Bucks Hitchcock v. Chaplin-Storks, Serjt. Carnarvon. . Doe dem. of Wynne, Esq., v. Parry
Bedford
Wright v. Waterfield-Gunning

clerk & ors.-Attorney General Monmouth James v. Phelps-Talourd, Serjt.

Carmarthen. Evans v. Rees, Esq.-Chilton
Latch v. Thomas Wedlake & Lewis County of borough of Carmarthen :
Thomas-Maule

Davies v. Stacey & anor.—Evans
Salop Frank v. Edwards-Same
Eaton and others v. Jervis-Tal-

Hilary Term, 1839.
fourd, Serjt.

Middlesex The Queen v. Sarah Virrier-SteGloucester Cole v. Cresswell-A. V. Richards

phen, Serjt. Trinity Term, 1838.

Sims, administratrix, &c. v. Thomas, Middlesex Willis v. Bennett-Attorney General

Esq., M.P.-Erle
Rowe v. Brookes-Platt

Ladd v. Thomas & anor.-Platt
Cadby v. Martinez-R. V. Richards

Smyth v. Boards--Theobald
Woolf v. Beard-Humfrey

London Poole v. Crowder & anor.--Atl. Gen. London Brown and others v. Blakiston-At

Geary v. Harvey, Esq., M.P.-Same torney General

The Birmingham, Bristol, & Thames Allen, a pauper, v. Flicker & anor.

Junction Railway Company v.
Heaton

Locke—Sir W. W. Follett
Michaelmas Term, 1838.

Hey v. Wyche-Same
Middlesex Symes v. Nipper-Erle

Lady Tufton & anor, v. Whitmore
Rush v. Peacock-Same

& anor.-Same
The Queen v. Thomas Deane and London Baker v. Baker-Kelly
others (2 cases)-Kelly & Crowder

Sadler & ors. y. Whitmore & ors.London . . Rothschild v. Currie-Sir F. Pollock

Same
Rouch, ass. &c. v. The Great Western

Bracey v. Carter-Kelly
RailwayCompany--SirW.W.Follett

Abrahams v. Skinner-J. Jervis
Corke v. Walker-Kelly

Hart v. Crowley-Platt
Palmer v. Hembery-Same
White v. Teal-Platt

Easter Term 1839.
Levy v. Nolekin-Knowles

Middlesex , Edan v. Dudfield-Kelly
Bucks. Allan v. Gomine & an.-Storks, Serj.

The Aylesbury Railway Company v. Nicholls v. Baker-Kelly

Thompson--Same Bedford. The Queen v. Inhabitants of Bar

Delisser v. Towne-Same
ton-Same

Lynch an infant v. Nurdin-Same
Cirket v. Wing, clerk—Andrews

Hawkins v. Paxton-Erle
Cambridge Chambers v. Porter-Kelly

Doedem. of Ivev.Scott & an. J. Jervis
Eaden v. Berry-Same
Norfolk

Milligan v. Wedge-Humfrey
Evelyn, Bart. v. Glover, clk.-Same

Bennett exors. v. Burton, clerk-
Gloucester Luxton, ass. &c. v. Guppy-Luullow,

Hoggins
Serjt.

London Boorman & ors. v. Brown--Altorney
Charlton v. Alway-Same

General

[ocr errors]

9

[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]

.

[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]
[blocks in formation]

.

.

.

[ocr errors]

London Thompson & Ors. exors. &c. v. / York Bacon v. Smith & anr. assignees &c.
Usborne-Same

-Cresswell
Same v. Same-kelly
Rogers v. Custance--Sir F. Pollock

COURT IN BANCO.
Emys v. Bennetts & others. Bompas
Serjeant

PEREMPTORY RULES,
Bult & ors. Morrell & ors.-J. Jervis

For Michaelmas Term, 1839.
Lincoln
Doe. dem. Long & ors. Churchwar-

FIRST DAY.
dens &c. v. The Dean and Chapter
of Peterborough-Andrews Serjt.

Wilton, Gent., one, &c. v. Chambers Leicester Knight v. Mc. Dowall & ors. (in re

Utterton v. Castledine plevin)--Hill

Surrey · · The Queen v. Steward of Manor of Northampton Doe d. Norton & ors. v. Webster

Richmond
Waddington

Carnarvon The Queen v. Christopher Alderson Nottingham Williams Wo. executrix, &c. v. Fos

and others brooke-White

Bottrell v. Wordsworth and another Sussex. Adnam v. Thompson—Thesiger Carinarthen The Queen v. The Mayor, &c. of Boyce v. Ogle-Platt

Carmarthen
Essex Taylor v. Henniker Bart.-Same Lancaster .. The Queen v. Manchester and Leeds
Same v. Same-Same

Railway Company.
Wbite v. Cutts-Same

Bristol The Queen v. W.L. T. Pyle Taunton Hertford White v. Donald-Thesiger

Glamorgan . The Queen v. The Mayor, &c. of Gloucester Doe d. Allen & anr. Allen & another

Swansea
Lullow Serjt.

In the matter of Wm. Willis, Genl.,
Doe. d. Shingleton & ors.v. Faulkner-

one, &c. and William Allen Talfourd Serjt.

Norfolk ... The Queen v. Sarah Gamble & anr. Hoare v. Scott-Godson

Bailey, Esq. v. Bond and others Salop Smith v. Stanley-Talfourd, Serjt. Derbyshire . The Queen v. The Churchwardens of Lead v. Summers—R. V. Richards

Edlaston Monmouth Doe d. Thomas v. Beynon-Car- Totnes The Queen v. Wm. Price rington

The Queen v. Wm. Hobbarton Chester. The Mayor Alderman and Burgesses

The Queen v. Jaspar Parrott
of the City of Chester v. Peers

Sparkes y. Mayo
J. Evans

England The Queen v. William Batchelor Chester Bunting v. Barlow J. Jervis

Brownlow and others Radnor. Doe d. of Crowther v. Drew—J. Middlesex . . The Queen v. Commercial Railway Evans

Company Carmarthen Jones v. Downman-Same

Bedfordshire The Queen v. The Trustees of the Cardigan Jones v. Jones (in replevin) —Chilton

Luton Roads
Flint
Adams v. Jones-J. Jervis

Essex

The Queen v. The Guardians of Norfolk King v. Burrell- Attorney General

Braintree Union
Rix v. Borton clk. & anr.- Andrews Glamorgan . The Queen v. The Mayor, &c. of
Cambridge, Mitchell v. Foster-Attorney General

Swansea
Doe several dems. of Thompson &

ors. v. Amey-Analeews
Bedford .. Smith Wo. v. Smith-Storks Serjt.

Goddard v. Trevannion and another Surfolk Doe d. Garrod v. Olley & anr.-Kelly Lancaster . . The Queen v. Woodburn PostlethBucks Doe d. Farmer the elder v. Howe

waite Same

Liverpool . . The Queen v. Thomas Harvey Lancaster . Haigh & anr. v. Brooks - Cresswell

Pitt v. Goodinge, Gent., one, &c. Bayley, Gent, one &c.v.Ashton-Same Dorset . . The Queen v. The Tithe CommisThe Queen v. Sharp- Alexander

sioners of England and Wales Lancaster . Ridgway & ors. v. Ewbank & anr.- Bedfordshire The Queen v. The Justices of BedW. H. Watson

fordshire York

Tomlin v. Bowskill-Alerander Lancaster . . The Queen v. John Harrison
Lockwood clk. v. Wood-Same Leicestershire The Queen v. The Guardians of Bar-
Same v. Lund-Same

row on Sea
Culvertson v. Melton-Cresswell Carmarthen. The Queen v. J. L. Brigstocke and
Bentham v. Martindale-Same

others The Queen v. Stamper & anr.-Bliss Yorkshire . . The Queen v. The Trustees of the Northumberland;

Doncaster and Selby Roads Stephenson v. Stainthorpe-- Alexander Stafford . . The Queen r. The Poor Law ComTown and County of Newcastle :

missioners (Alstonfield IncorporaGibson v. Kirk-Mathews

tion) Camberland . Martindale v. Smith-Dundas

In the matter of Wm. Robert DodDorset Yeatinan clerk v. Dashwood, clk to

son and others trustees &c.-Bompas Serjt.

Knight v. M‘Dowall & ors., in repln. Cornwall . Powning v. Leach & anr.-Same

Same v. Same, in replevin Somerset. The Queen v. Walter Irvine-Erle

Scruton v. Taylor and another

Lancaster . . The Queen (on prosecution of Brooks Trinity Term, 1839.

and others) v. The Sheffield, AshMiddlesex . Dixon v. Thompson, sued &c.-Erle

ton-under-Lyne, and Manchester Banks v. Rough, sued &c.—Kelly

Railway Company
Natban v. Irvin-Defendant in person

The Queen (on prosecution of the
Cadell --Ball

[ocr errors]

.

SECOND DAY.

.

[ocr errors]

devisees under the will of G.

Charles v.

[blocks in formation]

Legh, Esq.) . The Same

Wood & E.-Bryant v. Sir James Arthur, dem.
Jones v. Thomas

Abrahams-Benjamin v. Belcher, dem.
THIRD DAY.

Smart & B.-Doed. Riddell Wo.v. Gwinnell, special
In the matter of Elizabeth Berney Jeyes & S.-Hill v. Leach, dem.

(case Gibbs y, Trevanion and another Baltye & Co.-Guardians of the Poor of the BanSame v. Same

bury Union v. Robinson, dem. Warwickshire : The Queen v. The Birmingham Few 8.Co.-Lloyd v. Pierce and others (in replevin) Canal Company

dem. Gloucester .. The Queen v. John Harris

Vandercom &. Co. - Drewe v. Lainson, Esq. and
Trevanion and another v. Holloway another, late Sheriff of Middlesex, dem.
Same v. Same

[in error Gore-Tomson v. Lanyon, dem.
Same v. Martins-in error

Bignold— Doe D. Park and wife v. Kirby, spe. case Same v. Savage—in error

Dean--Walmsley and another v. Cooper, dem. Same v. Gibbs-in error

Wiliamson & H.- Tindall v. Hepton and wife, Lancaster . . The Queen v. The Jusitces of Lanca- executrix, &c. dem.

shire-appointment of overseers Anderton & S.-Doe D. Blight v. Pett, special case
of Great Bolton)

Battye & Co.-The Guardians of the Poor of the
The Queen V. The Same (ap- Banbury Union v. Robinson, dem.
pointment of overseersof Charlton) SameBruce and the Bath River Navigation Com-
FOURTH DAY.

pany v. Willis and others, special case
Ex parte Geo. Fleetwood, in the mat- Oliverson & Co.-Mitchell v. Ede & ors. special case

ter of Edw. Littledale and another CarrettLawrie v. Francis, dem. Dorsetshire . The Queon v. The Trustees of Harn- Coode & B.--Robins and others v. May, dem. ham Roads

Frankham & D.--Joyce v. Clarke & Goswick, dem. Salop .... The Queen v. The Priors Ditton In- Monkhouse-Read y. F. Wront, sued with ano. dem. closure Commissioners

Jones-Guppy v. Luxton, assignee, dem.
Ex parte Cairne and another, in the Milne & Co.-Haughton & ors. v. Fielden, special case

matter of Alfred Leigh and another Tilsons & Co.—Mayor, &c. of London v. Woolvet, York The Queen v. The Mayor &c. of York dem. Middlesex . . The Queen v. The Commercial Rail- | Webber-Holmes v. Clifton, Esq., dem. way Company

Harmer 8. S.-Curtis y. Hickes, dem.
Derbyshire . The Queen v. The North Midland | Karslake & Co.--Holdsworth, Esq. v. the Mayor of
Railway Company

Dartmouth, special verdict
Firth v. Harris

Hodgson-Davis v. Holding, dem.
Lancaster . . The Queen v. The Justices of Lanca- Swan f. M.-Wise v. Hodsoll, dem.

shire, (appointment of Overseers Lambert & B.-Hatch v. Trayes, dem.
of Manchester)

Smith 8. 5.—Whittaker v. Lloyd, dem.
Evans v. Okell

Bicknell & Co.-- Doe dem, of Blewett, otherwise Middlesex .. The Queen v. The Justices of Mid- called &c. Phillips, special case.

dlesex, (St. Pancras appeal) Blower 8.V.-Greenslade and ors. v. Perry, dem. The Queen v. The Same, sitting at Lever-Smales v. Tyerman, dem. Hatton Garden Office

Aillington & Co.-Doe D. Batchellor v. Ramey, dem Ord and another v. Barrow and ano. Pearson-- Yeatman, clk. v. Dashwood, clk. dem. Hunter v. Hicks

Gough- Bloor and anor. v. Cox and anor., dem.

Edwards-Kirk v. Thompson, den.
BAIL COURT.

Batty-Beaumont v. Pope, dem.
PEREMPTORY RULES,

Bignold & Co.- Bignold and others v. Parken and
For Michaelmas Term, 1839.

another, dem.

Lewis-Whyte, administrator, &c. in person y.
FIRST DAY.

Rose, dem.
Archer v. Kearse

Plumptree-Hawthorn and others, assignees, &c.
Floud the younger v. Carter

v. The Newcastle-upon-Tyne & North Shields Thackthwaite v. Sinclair Doe several dems of Haworth and Lane-Lane v. Chapman, dem.

Railway Company, special case
another v. Helme and another

Billing-Cleaton the younger v. Busby, dem.
Anthony Marmion v. Lady F. Parker Johnsion-Watson v. Kightley, Gent., dem.

Coull v. Hall and another
One Rule

Palmer & Co.-Children v. Mannering, dem.
Coull & anor, exors. v. Hall & anor.

Swain & Co-Rogers v. Norman, dem.
Doe d. Jackson the elder v. Davis

Faulkner-Bottrell v. Wordsworth, dem.
Merriman v. Buckerfield

Palmer & Co.-Doe d. Lord Grantley v. Butcher Cheshire . The Queen v. Justices of Chester

and others, special case Ipswich The Queen v. William Bullar

Walker-Emms v. Cole, dem, Hants. The Queen v. The Lord and Steward Olive-Dempsey v. Homfray, dem. of the Manor of Bishops Stoke

Jenings & T.-Littler v. Thomson, dem. Suffolk The Queen v. The Justices of Suffolk WathenDowell v. Hodgson, Esq. & anor., dem. SECOND DAY.

Acton-Savory, ass. &c. v. Chapman, Esq., dem. Doe dem. of Mobbs y. Roe

Armstrong--Hasledon & anor. v. Almond, dem. Doe several dems. of Mudd and an- Starling-Liddle v. Brownson, dem. other v. Roe

Burton-Horner v.

Keppell, dem.
Hidger v. Hood and another

Chisholm & Co.-Strachan, assignee, v. Thomas,

Esq., dem.
SPECIAL PAPER.

Trail-Bayntun v. Bayntun, dem.
Michaelnias Term 1839.

Beetholme-White v. Ruby, dlem.

Flower—Friend who sued, &c. v. Butterfield, den. E, Chester-Archbishop of York and others v.

Dale-Bowler v. Nicholson, dem.

[verdict Trafford and others, special case Lambert-Ramsay v. Nomabell, (in replevin) dem.'.Young & S.-Doe d. Sabin & ors. v. Sabin, special

.

.

. Same]

« EelmineJätka »