tionem monitoriam serenissimi ac potentissimi principis, Jacobi, Dei gratia, Magnæ Britanniæ, Franciæ et Hiberniæ regis, fidei defensoris, omnibus Christianis monarchis, principibus atque ordinibus inscriptam. Nicolas Coeffetau, afterwards Bishop of Marseilles, published against the king's preface, at Paris, in 1610, in octavo, Response a l'avertissement, addresse par le serenissime Roy de la Grande Bretagne Jacques I. a tous les princes et potentates de la chretiente. This was answered by Peter du Moulin, minister of Charenton, whose vindication of the king, was printed in French at Paris, in 1610, in octavo, and in Latin at London. The French title is, Defence de la foy catholique, continue au livre de Jacques I. Roy d'Angleterre contre la response de N. Coeffetau. Coeffetau replied to Peter du Moulin's book, in his apologie pour la response a l'avertissement du serenissime Roy de la Grande Bretagne, contre les accusations du Pierre du Moulin, ministre de Charenton, printed at Paris 1614, in octavo. Mr. John Donne, afterwards doctor of divinity and dean of St. Paul's, wrote and published, before his entrance into orders, a quarto volume, printed at London in 1610, in support of the king's defences of the oath of allegiance, Pseudo-martyr: "wherein out of certaine propositions and gradations, this conclusion is evicted, that those, which are of the Romane religion in this kingdom, may, and ought to take the oath of allegiance." Father Parsons, the Jesuit, published at St. Omers, in 1608, in quarto, the judgment of a catholic gentleman, concerning king James's apology for the oath of allegiance answered by Dr. William Barlow, afterwards bishop of Lincoln. Wood. Ath. Oxon. Vol. I. col. 362. Martinus Becanus published at Mentz in 1610, in octavo, Refutatio apologiæ et monitoriæ præfationis Jacobi regis Angliæ and Refutatio torturæ torti contra sacellanum regis Angliæ. Dr. William Tooker, dean of Litchfield, answered him in his Certamen cum Martino Becano, futiliter refutante apologiam Jacobi regis, printed in 1611, in octavo, at London. Becanus replied to Dr. Tooker, in his Duellum cum Gulielmo Tooker de primatu regis Angliæ, printed at Mentz, in octavo; where he published likewise, the same year, and in the same form, a book against bishop Andrews, intitled Controversia Anglicana de potestate regis et pontificis contra Lancellottum Andræam. To which last book of Becanus an answer was given by Robert Burhill, intitled, Contra Becani controversiam Anglicanam assertio pro jure regis, proque episcopi Eliensis responsione ad apologiam Bellarmini; London 1613, in octavo-Mr. Richard Harris published likewise an answer in Latin, at London, 1612, in octavo, to Becanus's Controversia Anglicana. Leonardus Lessius wrote against the king's Præfatio monitoria, in a book printed at Antwerp, 1611, in octavo, and intitled De Antichristo et ejus præcursoribus disputatio, qua refutatur præfatio monitoria Jacobi regis Magnæ Britanniæ. This was answered by Dr. George Downame, afterwards bishop of Londonderry in Ireland, in his book, called, Papa Antichristus, seu diatriba duabus partibus, quarum prior 6 libris vindicat Jacobi regis sententiam de Antichristo, posterior refutat Leonardi Lessii 16 demonstrationes regis præfationi monitoriæ oppositas : London 1620. Francis Suares, the Jesuit, attacked the king's apology for the oath of allegiance in his Defensio fidei catholicæ contra Anglicanæ sectæ errores, una cum responsione ad Jacobi regis apologiam pro juramento fidelitatis, printed at Coimbra in 1613, and at Mentz in 1619. Leonardus Cocquæus, an Augustinian monk, published at Friburg, in 1610, Examen præfationis apologiæ Jacobi regis pro juramento fidelitatis. James Gretser, the Jesuit, in 1610, printed at Ingolstad, Βασιλικον Δωρον, seu commentarius exegeticus in Jacobi regis Magnæ Britanniæ præfationem monitoriam, et in ejusdem apologiam pro juramento fidelitatis. Andreas Eudæmon-Johannes wrote against bishop Andrews, in his Parallelus Torti et tortoris ejus L. Cicestrensis, seu responsio ad torturam Torti pro Roberto Bellarmino; Colen in 1611. This was replied to by Dr. Samuel Collins, Regius Professor of divinity at Cambridge, in a book, printed there in quarto, under the title of "Increpatio Andreæ Eudæmon-Johannis de infami parallelo, et renovata assertio torturæ Torti pro episcopo Eliensi."-He published likewise, at Cambridge, in 1617, in quarto, "Epphata to T. T. or a defence of the bishop of Ely concerning his answer to cardinal Bellarmin's apology, against the calumnies of a scandalous pamphlet." GENERAL INDEX. The Numerals i. ii. iii. iv. v. refer to the Volume; the Figures to the Page. A ABBOT, archbishop, said to have instigated king James against the Absurdities eagerly swallowed by some men, iii. 86. Academical discipline relaxed after the Restoration, v. 8. Academies of Greece and Rome, object of their institution, iv. 6. Act of uniformity, see Uniformity. Acts of parliament formerly proclaimed in the markets, iv. 40. Affability mistaken for tenderness and good-nature, as in the character Agitators, the, desirous of a conjunction with the king, ii. 451-Send Aix-la-Chapelle, peace of, disgusting to the French king, y. 200. Allegiance and protection, mutual obligations between the prince and Allen, sir Thos. lord mayor of London, prevails on Moncke to de- Allington, Wm. lord, pensioned by Charles the Second for his par- Altar, ceremony of bowing to it, when and by whom introduced, ii. Ambassador, Swedish, how received by Cromwell, iii. so. Amboyna, cruelties exercised there by the Dutch on the English, Amnesty, a general, proclaimed by Charles the Second, iv. 356. Andover, lord, married by a popish priest, ii. 233. Andrews, bishop of Winchester, his witty reply to James the First, i. 156. Andrews, bishop of Chichester and Ely, his answers to Bellarmin, i. 303. Andrews, dean, as chairman of the Irish convocation, compared by Anglesey, lord, leaves a memorandum in writing, that the Icon Basi- Anne, lady, wife to James duke of York, her character, i. 37-Her Annesley, Mr. active in promoting the restoration of Charles the Antrim, earl of, supposed concern of, in the Irish rebellion, ii. 396, Aprice, Rev. J. his account of the last moments of Charles the Second, Arbitrary doctrines, if countenanced by the court, the intention is to Arlington, lord chamberlain, refuses to let the commissioners of the Arminius, his amiable character, i. 146-Virulence of king James Army, the, seizes Charles the First at Windsor, ii. 450. iv. 34-Nego- |