Page images
PDF
EPUB

the soldiers standing on the banquette of one line should be secured from the fire of the ground in front of the other, which firo is called reverse fire, because it strikes them in rear. This is effected by placing a mound of earth or traverse between them, and determining its height as well as the height of the parapets in the following manner :

On the commanding point C (fig. 21) is placed a boning rod CD of the normal height, and another BE of the same height at B, or st the position of the traverse; then the height of the crest of the parapet of A is determined by the intersection of the visual line from b to E with the pole fixed at A, at the point a, which is here high,

as Cis so much higher than A. See preceding rules and equations. In like manner a pole of the proper height being fixed at the extent of range on the opposite side at C, the visual line from D' to E determines the height, a', of the parapet of A', which is much lower than the parapet of A, as A' and e' are nearly on the sanie level. Now, to defilade the banquettes, and to determine the height of the traverse necessary for that purpose, set up on the banquette of A a pole bb of the same height as CD, CD, BE, and the visual line from D' to b determines the height of the traverse at f, which is necessary to secure the banquette of A from the reverse fire of C, whilst the visual line drawn from D to determines the height of the traverse sufficient to protect the banquette of A' from the reverse fire of C.

D'

E

FIG. 21.-Practical Measurements in Defilading.

The application of these principles to a work formed of two lines (or "faces" as they are called), terminating in a salient angle is shown by fig. 22, but the application is the same whether the work is connected with a line of intrenchment as a "redan," is detached as in a "ravelin" and other outworks, or forms part of a peculiar system or arrangement of works, as in the tenaille system of Montalembert, called by its author the angular system,-terms and works which will be hereafter more fully explained. Here the commanding point is supposed to be at M, and to

B

Fig. 22.

secure the defenders of the face AB from a reverse fire it is necessary to interpose the traverse cd, called from its object a "parados." The length of the traverse cd is determined by the line MB, beyond which it should project sufficiently to give ample security to a space about 50 feet wide behind the parapet. At the other end, the traverse is not carried up to the salient angle, as it would interfero with the communication, but is completed by ba, perpendicular to the other face, by which arrangement the space within the salient and the banquette are left free. The two lines MdB and Mef, passing through points at the

are so situated as to give an enfilade fire along both the faces AB, AB' (fig. 23). In this case a small work DAD' is formed in connexion with the parapet, by drawing lines parallel to the crests CB and C'B' at a distance from them equal to the breadth of the banquette, and then determining, in the manner. explained, the heights at A necessary to defilade a certain length of the banquettes of CB and CB' from the fire sweeping them, and assuming the greater of the two as the height of the parapet at A. This work is called a bonnette; and when the height necessary to defilade the whole of one or both faces is found to exceed 12 feet, the height of A should be restricted to that limit, and traverses T, T', T2 should be placed at such distances as shall defilade the remainder of the work.

The internal space may frequently be sufficiently defiladed by raising the salient portion of the parapet without disturbing the line of direction of the crest; but in that case

[graphic][subsumed][subsumed]
[graphic]

Fra. 23, showing Bonnette DAD', and Traverses T, TT.

normal height above the banquette, determine the height of the traverse. It may, however, happen that the commands

Fig. 24.

the banquettes of the two faces would not be covered from enfilade fire, and hence the necessity of a bonnette. The increased height of the parapet of the bonnette renders it necessary to adopt two banquettes b, b', one below the other, and each provided with steps to facilitate ascent (figs. 23, 24). The operation of defilading may be also effected by planes of defilade; as, for example, if the line which marks out or limits the space to be defiladed be first drawn, and a plane be supposed to pass through a line either 6 ft. 6 in. or 8 ft. (or whatever height between these may be assumed as the normal height N) above the limiting line, and through a point the same height above the commanding point, this

plane will determine the height of the parapet, the crest of which will necessarily be in it.

Where the parapet is continued not only on the flanks but also in rear, so as to form an inclosed work, it may often be necessary to defilade it in various directions as in fig. 25. Whore two traverses or parados cross each other, they must, of course, be so placed that they shall not only completely defilade the whole interior space of the work, but shall secure from reverse fire the banquette on each side, the normal N being therefore at least 6 ft. 6 in. above the banquette. Where traverses of this kind become necessary, the engineer must take in to account the space

b

Fig. 25.

they will occupy, and plan his work accordingly; and should he be able to render the difficulty of attacking one side of his works very great, he may construct the traverses so that they may be used as retrenchments, and thus increase the means of defence; for example, S being the salient of greatest strength, bcỏ might be defended, and then bed. This subject has been enlarged upon because it is of much importance in military engineering, as the safety of a long line of works may be endangered by defective defilade. Though considered here in a practical form, it depends entirely upon geometrical principles, and instruction in descriptive geometry is therefore essential in all schools of military engineering.

Having determined the relief of the crest of the parapet in reference to the plane of site, all the other vertical dimensions follow from it, as shown in several of the preceding figures; whilst the horizontal dimensions are determined by the thickness necessary to resist the enemy's missiles and by the slopes required to ensure stability. The Penetration at a mean range into common earth after it has been dug up and well-rammed and into other materials is as stated below, and to these dimensions one half should be added for the thickness for security. English Field Artillery.

[merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small]

men, or difficulty of ground, for reducing the thickness of the parapet below 14, or at the utmost 12 feet. For form. ing the parapet under peculiar circumstances of difficulty the engineer will avail himself of every fitting substance which may be at hand, such as bags of wool, mattresses, fire-wood, manure heaps, and fascines, either by themselves or packed in gabions. The resistance of fascines is not great, their strength being rapidly diminished by the speedy fracture of their branches when exposed to sharp

fire.

With these data it will be easy to regulate all the dimensions of the parapet,-the height of its crest, or the relief of the work, having been first established. Thus tho banquette or step on which the men stand, when firing over the parapet, should for convenience be 4 ft. 3 in: below the crest. The breadth or tread should for a single rank be 3 ft., for a double rank 5 ft.; the surface should slope backwards 2 inches in the 3 ft., 3 inches in the 5 ft., so as to discharge water freely and keep the banquette dry; the base of the interior slope of the banquette up which the men mount should be twice its height; if the height of the parapet exceed the normal height, the banquette should have two treads or steps, the lower about seven feet below the crest, so that one rank of men may stand thereon whilst reloading the muskets of the rank on the step above them; or it should have three steps, each with a rise of 1 ft., and a tread of 1 ft. or 1 ft. 3 in., sloping slightly to the rear, by which arrangement the necessary excavation of the ditch will be diminished, and less of the interior space occupied. The interior slope of the parapet should be made very steep, so that a man firing over the parapet should be as close to it as possible; the base should not exceed one half the height; the superior slope, or “ plongée,” of the parapet, by which the fire is directed towards the point on which it is to act, should not be less than one-ninth, nor more than one-fourth of its thickness, and in service is generally made one-sixth; but as the increase of the slope facilitates the destruction of the crest, it should be kept as slight as possible. It is usual on the Continent to retain the angle of the crest, as a constant quantity, at 100°, and to increase the base of the interior slope as the plunge increases, and vice versa; but this is not satisfactory, since, the height of the soldier's shoulder remaining constant whilst the line of plunge varies, the fire will not be always in the true direction; and it is preferable to keep the base of the interior slope as small as possible, and to make the top of the parapet at the crest horizontal for one or two feet, commencing the plunge therefrom, but reducing the top as the plunge increases. This flat top will facilitate the use of sand bags (bags filled with earth), which are sometimes so arranged on the crest of the parapet as to form loopholes for the musketry, thereby adding to the cover of the men. The base of the exterior slope of the parapet should at least equal its height, though possibly in some soils-e.g., chalk-the exterior slope may stand at a steeper angle than 45°. The slopes of the escarp and counterscarp should be as steep as prac ticable, but generally they will be the same as the exterior slope. Between the exterior slope and the escarp a "berm" is left. This berm is a space at least 1 ft. 6 in. wide and slightly inclined downwards and outwards for drainage; it gives greater stability to the exterior slope and to the escarp, prevents the earth from the exterior slope from falling into the ditch, and is a standing ground for the repair of the must be retained in place by a wall called a parapet. Where steeper slopes are indispensable, the earth revetment," which may be formed of fascines (long cylindrical faggots), hurdles, sods, planks, clay puddling, and, in the interior of works, of sand bags. The base of the interior slope of the glacis should be equal to its height, and the exterior slope

should have a slope of 1 in 12. The command of the crest of the parapet over that of the glacis should be such that an assailant, standing on the crest of the latter, should not be able to fire into the interior of the work,-a condition which requires a command over the glacis of 5 feet, so that with a parapet 7 feet high the maximum height of glacis would be 1 feet. The minimum height of the glacis is determined by another condition, viz., that the fire from the

parapet should pass at no greater distance than 2 feet above its surface; and in no case should the plunge or slope of the glacis be greater than that of the parapet. An advanced glacis is sometimes adopted either to render the cover more effectual, or to occupy a favourable line for first opposing the progress of the enemy. Fig. 26 shows this arrangement, gg1, being the first or ordinary glacis, and g2g the second or advanced glacis. The slope of these

[graphic]

glacis should not be such as to withdraw the assailants from the grazing fire of the parapet, and if it be not possible to extend the slope of gg so far as to keep it in the prolongation of the line cg, it should be so arranged that no point of the slope should be more than 2 feet below that line or the plane corresponding to it, namely, the plane passing through the crest of the parapet and the crest of the advanced glacis. To form the advanced glacis, the slope at g is prolonged below the surface of the ground to g1, the earth excavated in doing this supplying the material for the glacis. When it is intended that the defence of this advanced glacis shall be derived solely from the parapet, either an abattis or rows of stakes may be placed immediately behind it, so as to stop the advance of the enemy when at the point of maximum exposure, but advanced glacis may often assume the character of successive intrenchments, and be defended with vigour and success. This figure will be again referred to when treating on defence by mines. The height of the parapet being deter mined by the amount of cover required, and the thickness by the nature of projectile to which it is exposed, the whole profile or section is necessarily completed on the principles pointed out, and the bulk therefore of earth contained in any portion of the parapet will be equal to the area of the mean or average profile multiplied by the length of that portion. Now, as this earth must be obtained from the ditch, the dimensions of the latter depend on those of the former; and the volume of any portion of the excavated ditch will also be equal to the mean section of that portion multiplied by its length.

1

m

[merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small]

-++D) Now, as the defensive

28

y, and y=

object of the

ditch requires that it should be both deep and wide enough to
form a decided obstacle to an enemy, the width ought not to be
less than 18 feet, whilst the depth should have no other limit
than that arising from the difficulty of raising the earth, which
fixes 12 feet as about the maximum. Taking y -12 feet,
and D-108 square feet, then z-9-9-0, and the width of the
ditch therefore of 12-18 feet,-the ditch being triangular.
Assuming a profile area of 70, corresponding to a parapet 7 feet
high and ouly 6 feet thick, and making x-0 for a triangular ditch,
y- D-
D-9 ft. 7 in., and the width of the ditch-14 feet; with
a profile area of 116 feet corresponding to a parapet 7 feet high and
12 feet thick, the depth of the ditch, if triangular, is 12 feet, and
the width 183 feet; so that this profile appears about the maximum
for a triangular ditch with a profile area of 163 feet, corresponding
to a parapet 8 feet high and 18 feet thick: With a banquette 4 feet
wide a triangular ditch would give y-14 feet, so that such a forin
would be inconvenient; but taking 2-4 feet as the width of the
bottom of the ditch, y or the depth becomes 12 ft. 4 in., and the width
of the top of the ditch 224 feet-a very well-proportioned ditch.

[ocr errors]

In the preceding cases the base of the slope of the escarp has been assumed as equal to its height, and that of the slope of the counterscarp as equal to half its height. Should the nature of the soil be such as to require the base to be equal to the height in both escarp and counterscarp, y = 2y; and should the soil be sufficiently firm to admit of a base of one-half in both, y=y. In the first of these cases, even with the large profile area last named, the ditch may be made triangular with a depth of 123 feet, and a breadth of 25 feet; and in the second a triangular ditch is inadmissible with a profile area of 116 feet, as the depth would be more than 15 feet; indeed it would be inadmissible with profile areas beyond 85 square feet, for which a depth of 13 feet would be required. Before leaving this subject, a few words may be said respecting the "berm." The most effectual escarp for defence is that which forms one continuons plane with the exterior slope, or at least which commences "immediately where the other ends, as the absolute relief of the parapet is then a maximum, and there is no berm; but in many cases it would be imprudent to carry the parapet to the edge of the escarp, as injury to the latter would occasion the fall of part of the parapet, while the difficulty of

If, therefore, P represent the area of the mean section of this portion of the parapet, D the area of the mean section of the corresponding portion of the ditch, and L the length of this portion, then LP-LD, provided the earth be of the same bulk after as before excavation; but this is not the case, for after having been broken up from its previously closely packed condition, it is found that the "remblai" or earth built up exceeds the "deblai" or earth excavated by a coefficient varying with the nature of the soil, being in sandy soil nearly 0. Thus if represent the coefficient, in sand it is 0, in earth of medium tenacity, and in very strong and naturally compressed earth; so that to render the earth of the litch just equal to that of the parapet, the above equation should be LP - L (D+ D) and P-D+ D, or D- P. As, however, the earth resulting from this excess, even allowing for the. greater length of the ditch in polygonal works, will be required for forming the glacia, or for making up the banks, called "barbettes," in the salients constructed for raising guns sufficiently high to fire over the parapet, the dimensions of the ditch may be safely estiLet a be the breadth of the bottom of the ditch, and y its depth; and let the sum of the bases of the slopes of the escarp and counter

1

m

mated without reference to the excess, as follows:

m

m+1

construction would be greatly increased by having no inter-able. They are very difficult of capture by the front attack, mediate stage between the bottom of the ditch and the top when defended by trained troops with breech-loading rifled of the parapet. The "berm," or step between the top of the escarp and the bottom of the parapet, is made from 1 foot 6 inches to 4 feet wide, according to the nature of the soil, and it then becomes possible in some cases to increase the slope of the escarp to a base of one-half or two-thirds, or at least to such a slope as shall place the foot of the escarp in the prolongation of the exterior slope of the parapet. The berm is encumbered with obstacles to prevent an enemy from making use of it as a halting place (see fig. 14). The slope of the counterscarp is usually one-third, one-half, or two-thirds, when that of the escarp is one-half, twothirds, or 1; the bottom of the ditch should slope from the sides to the centre, to carry off the water, and obstacles should be provided there to prevent the enemy from collecting and reforming his men in the ditch, which, in all cases of simple lines, without flanking defences, he would do were it left free from obstructions.

FIELD FORTIFICATION.

The parapet has been hitherto considered principally in its character as the simplest element of defence, affording at once protection to the soldiers behind it and obstructing the advance of their enemies; but it is now time to consider the manner in which this parapet may be so arranged as to constitute a series of defensive and mutually defending works. If the antiquity of an invention be estimated by its position in the social history of the races of mankind, there can be no doubt that earthworks claim the priority over other forms of defence. In North America vestiges of circular earthen intrenchments, as well as of works of other forms, have been discovered, the antiquity of which is unknown; and in more recent times small parties of the aboriginal inhabitants encountering greater numbers of a hostile tribe have been known to excavate hollow spaces in the ground, and, throwing out the earth, to form around them circular intrenchments in which they have defended themselves to the last. In Ireland the ancient inhabitants have left similar relics of their earthen defences; in Great Britain there are numerous similar remains, the works of the Romans and of people long antecedent to the Romans; but the consideration of earthen works for the defence of extensive positions will be resumed further on, and such works will be considered here only in connexion with the arrangements adopted by an army in the field for its own immediate security.

The art of constructing temporary works in the field for this purpose is called Field Fortification. This art is of very high antiquity; the Roman soldiers relied much upon such works, and executed them with wonderful rapidity, even in the presence of an enemy.

Shelter Trenches. Of this art the simplest form is that in which troops are preserved intact until the moment of attack arrives. At first sight it would seem that this can best be effected by keeping them out of fire. The increase in the range of arms of all kinds has, however, become so great that it is no longer possible to keep troops out of fire and yet in a sufficiently advanced position from which they shall be able to attack promptly; hence it has become an absolute necessity to provide shelter for them.

A very shallow trench with the earth thrown to the front will afford, to men lying in it, cover against artillery fire, and a good rest for their arms when they have occasion to deliver their own fire. Moreover, it presents no obstacle to the advance of supporting troops, and offers but little mark to the enemy. Such trenches (figs. 27, 28, 89, 30) are called shelter trenches, and may be made of any depth or form' according to the time and moans avail

FIG. 27. Shelter Trench,-constructed in 25 min. to 1-hour.

ments.

arms, and can be quickly developed into regular intrench-
The ordinary forms of shelter trench in use in the
British army are shown in figs. 28, 29, and 30.
The Russians made use of shelter trenches with great

Fia. 28. Shelter Trench,-1 hour.

effect in the defence of Sebastopol, and since that siege their employment has steadily developed.

In more recent times the greatest use of hasty intrenchments, though perhaps in the form rather of a line of

Fra. 29.-Shelter Trench,-1 hour.

intrenchments than of shelter trenches, was made by the Americans in the war of secession. Wherever they halted, no matter how short the time at their disposal, they threw up shelter. Each man worked for himself, and as if

FIG. 30.-Shelter Trench,-34 hours.

by instinct, and before fires were lit or provisions cooked, an intrenchment of some kind was formed. Probably the Americans had acquired this habit in their campaigns against the neighbouring Indians; and no doubt the superiority of rifled small arms, then for the first time freely used, thoroughly imbued them with a sense of the value of the slightest protection. General Sherman's campaign in Atalanta, and the actions in the neighbourhood of Richmond and Petersburg, furnish numerous instances. With reference to them General Barnard reports that a simple trench defended by two ranks of foot soldiers is an obstacle unassailable by direct attack. General Wright relates that, attacking a handful of infantry, in single rank, behind a parapet and trench, with two divisions in line, the num ber of his casualties exceeded the number of the enemy, and that if the intrenchment had been defended by two ranks of good troops, a whole army corps would not have taken it; and in summing up his relation, he says that a simple trench, defended by two ranks of foot soldiers, covered by abattis and other obstacles, placed so that the new rifled arms have full scope, is absolutely impregnable except by surprise.

After the fall of Nicopolis in August 1877, 28 battalions

of Turks, numbering about 10,000 men, collected at Plevna, and at once commenced to form shelter trenches; they were very deficient in artillery. Krudener attacked them four days after with 7000 Russians and 30 guns, and was defeated with a loss of 2800 men. Ten days later he again attacked with 30,000 men and 170 guns, but in the meantime the Turks had thrown up several redoubts, and had so extended their shelter trenches that their position was beginning to assume the condition of an intrenched camp; moreover, their strength had been swelled by reinforcements to 45,000 men. The Russians were again defeated with a loss of 8000 men. Six weeks later, upon the 30th September, Krudener, who had received 30 siege guns, having shelled the Turkish position for four days previously, attacked a third time with 50,000 Russians and Roumanians; but the Turks had in the interval received reinforcements of 10,000 men, and he was a third time repulsed with a loss of 15,000 men, though the Roumanians obtained possession of and beld a large redoubt called Gravitza. It then became evident to the Russians that Plevna could not be taken by assault, and they commenced to besiege by rule. By the 24th of October they had completed the investment by the occupation of the Loftcha and Rahova roads, all of which were previously open to the Turks, and had brought into battery against it 300 guns, 40 of which were siege guns. By the 10th of December they had collected 110,000 men and 500 guns around Plevna; and shortly after, Osman Pacha, having been repulsed with a loss of 6800 men in an attempt to cut his way out, surrendered, and his whole force, amounting to 43,000 men and 70 guns, became prisoners of war.

An army intrenched or fortified in the field is in many respects of the same effect as a fortress; the intrenchments supply the lack of numbers, and enable it to cover a country, to stop the advance of a superior enemy, or, if he chooses to risk a battle, oblige him to engage at a disadvantage. Charles V. furnishes a notable instance of the first. Opposed to a combined force of twice his strength, he at once commenced to intrench his army. In a few hours he was in a position to resist attack; in ten days he was so secure that, upon receiving reinforcements a few days later, he was enabled to assume an offensive which led in four months to the termination of the campaign in his favour. "In a war of march and manœuvre," says Napoleon, "if you would avoid a battle with a superior army, it is necessary to intrench every night, and to occupy a good defensive position. The natural positions which are ordinarily met with are not sufficient to protect an army against superior numbers without recourse to art. Those who proscribe lines of circumvallation, and the assistance which the science of the engineer can afford, deprive themselves gratuitously of an auxiliary which is never injurious, always useful, and often indispensable."

Whenever Napoleon had time and occasion for strengthening his position by field-works, he acted upon the principles recommended in the above extract, as almost all his predecessors had done. In the wars which followed the Revolution of 1688, in those of Queen Anne's reign, and during the Seven Years' War, we find the commanders of each period, William III., the duke of Marlborough, Marshal Villars, Marshal Saxe, Frederick II., and Marshal Daun, practically exemplifying their conviction of the great utility of field-works. Seven redoubts thrown up overnight saved Peter the Great at Pultowa, and enabled him to gain a decisive victory over his formidable antagonist; and at Borodino, three redoubts and eight flêches thrown up hastily by the Russians, caused the French great loss, and rendered the victory, which they gained by incredible

1 Military Maxims of Napoleon.

|

efforts of gallantry, fatally costly; and it is not improbable that if the main redoubt had been closed at its gorge the French would have failed to take it. In 1761 Frederick the Great, having only 55,000 men to oppose to the united Austrian and Russian forces of 130,000 men, intrenched himself in the strong position of Bunzelwitz, in Upper Silesia, not far from Schweidnitz, which he held until the united armies were forced to retire for want of supplies. It has been argued by some that intrenchments and fieldworks have oftener been carried than successfully defended, and that hence incommensurate importance has been attached to them. But it should be remembered that victory in such circumstances has been purchased at an expense which has often rendered it in effect equivalent to defeat, and that a practice which the greatest commanders of ancient and modern times have approved and followed cannot be of doubtful utility. At Austerlitz, where the contending armics were nearly equal, Napoleon wa preparing to superintend the construction of intrenchments when he found himself called upon to receive battle; and in Portugal, the duke of Wellington showed to what account the art of the engineer might be turned for influencing, not merely the fortune of a campaign, but the fate of a cause. The lines of Torres Vedras, which the powerful French army under Masséna was unable to pass, and from which the wave of war was rolled back broken into Spain, were perhaps the most remarkable works of the kind ever constructed.

"Lisbon," says Sir John Jones, "being situated at the extremity of a peninsula formed by the sea and the Tagus, it is plain that if an army be posted across the peninsula, no enemy can penetrate into the city without a direct attack on the army so posted. It was on this principle that the lines covering Lisbon were planned by Lord Wellington. Nature drew the rude outline of a strong defensive position, and art rendered it perfect. A tract of country thirty miles in extent from the mouth of the Zizandra on the ocean to Alhandra on the Tagus, was modelled into a field of battle; mountains were scarped perpendicularly, rivers dammed, and inundations formed; all roads favourable to the enemy were destroyed, and others made to facilitate the communications of the defenders; formidable works were erected to strengthen and support the weak parts. whilst numerous cannon, placed on inaccessible points, commanded the approaches and gave an equality of defence to the whole position."2 These lines were not continuous and connected works; they consisted of independent forts, redoubts, flêches, redans, batteries, so placed as to command and enfilade every approach, and to support each other by a cross and flanking fire. The first line occupied a front of twenty-nine miles between the sea and the Tagus, and by means of telegraphs intelligence could be conveyed from one extremity to the other in a few minutes; whilst the troops, disposed in masses in the rear of the works, were ready to move upon any point of attack by interior communications shorter than any by which the enemy could advance. and scope of these works," says Colonel Napier, "was to bar the passes, and to strengthen the fighting positions

"The aim

War in Spain, p. 124. The French army which invaded Portugal under Masséna consisted of three corps, under Marshals Ney and Junot and General Regnier, amounting in all to 66,000 infantry and 6000 cavalry, besides a strong body of the imperial guard, which crossed the Pyrenees after the invading force had commenced its march from the threatened invasion did not exceed 48,000 infantry and 3000 cavalry, neighbourhood of Salamanca. The force collected to oppose this of which about half were Portuguese levies, yet untried in any general action, and of which a very unfavourable opinion still continued to be entertained. In point of numbers, and still more in the composition of their army, therefore, the French had a decided superiority; but all their advantages were neutralized by the defensive position of Torres Vedras.

« EelmineJätka »