Then come his sister and his village friend, And search for crimson weeds, which spreading flow, Gipsies. On either side Is level fen, a prospect wild and wide, And salt the springs that feed the marsh between ; No hedge nor tree conceals the glowing sun; And sandy road has banks on either side; (From Tales-Lover's Journey.") Approaching Age. Six years had passed, and forty ere the six, The blood once fervid now to cool began, The cold neat parlour, and the gay glazed bed; My morning walks I now could bear to lose, And blessed the shower that gave me not to choose: In fact, I felt a languor stealing on; The active arm, the agile hand were gone; Small daily actions into habits grew, And new dislike to forms and fashion new; I loved my trees in order to dispose, I numbered peaches, looked how stocks arose, Told the same story oft-in short, began to prose. (From The Tales of the Hall.) The Crazed Maiden's Song. Let me not have this gloomy view About my room, around my bed; But morning roses, wet with dew, To cool my burning brows instead. As flow'rs that once in Eden grew, Let them their fragrant spirits shed, And every day the sweets renew, Till I, a fading flower, am dead. Oh! let the herbs I loved to rear Give to my sense their perfumed breath; Let them be placed about my bier, And grace the gloomy house of death. Where, only Lucy's self shall know; And insects their soft light display, The soil a pure and silver sand, There let my maiden form be laid, As innocent, but not so gay. I will not have the churchyard ground To press my shivering body round, Or on my wasted limbs be thrown. With ribs and skulls I will not sleep, In clammy beds of cold blue clay, I will not have the bell proclaim Say not, it is beneath my care; I cannot these cold truths allow; These thoughts may not afflict me there, But, O! they vex and tease me now. Raise not a turf, nor set a stone, That man a maiden's grave may trace, But thou, my Lucy, come alone, And let affection find the place. Oh! take me from a world I hate, Men cruel, selfish, sensual, cold; (From The Tales of the Hall.) Sketches of Autumn. It was a fair and mild autumnal sky, Long yellow leaves, from osiers, strewed around, But to his own reflections made reply, And said aloud, Yes! doubtless we must die.' 'We must,' said Richard; and we would not live To feel what dotage and decay will give; Cold grew the foggy morn, the day was brief, All green was vanished, save of pine and yew, It is hardly unfair to compare Crabbe's Better to love amiss than nothing to have loved, from The Struggles of Conscience, with Tennyson's 'Tis better to have loved and lost Than never to have loved at all. It was Crabbe who opined, not without reason, that he 'who often reads, will sometimes wish to write.' It is in The Widow's Tale that we read of A tender, timid maid! who knew not how and who was aggrieved When the coarse cloth she saw, with many a stain An admirable Life of the poet by his son, the Rev. George Crabbe (1785-1857), for twenty-three years vicar of Bredfield, Suffolk, was prefixed to the edition of the works published in eight volumes in 1834. See also Leslie Stephen's Hours in a Library (2nd series, 1876), E. FitzGerald's Readings in Tales of the Hall' (1882), and Kebbel's Crabbe (1888). FRANCIS HINDES GROOME. Jeremy Bentham (1748–1832), for more than half a century conspicuous as an author on jurisprudence and ethics, lived in intimate correspondence with the leading men of several generations and of various countries, and was unceasingly active in the propagation of utilitarianism and in insisting on reform in law. The son of a pushing and prosperous London attorney, he was educated at Westminster School and Queen's College, Oxford. He was little over twelve when he went to Oxford, but even then he was, from his precocity, not unjustly known by the name of 'the philosopher;' and though he never liked Oxford methods of study or of life, he took his degree of B.A. in 1763, and after studying law at Lincoln's Inn, was called to the Bar. He had a strong dislike to the legal profession, and never but once pleaded in public. His first publication was an acute but hypercritical examination of a passage in Blackstone's Commentaries, and was called A Fragment on Government (1776). The critique was prompted, no doubt, by a passion for improvement in those shapes in which the lot of mankind is meliorated by it,' but also by a profound contempt for Blackstone. He was stimulated by Priestley's writings. 'In the phrase, “the greatest happiness of the greatest number," I then saw delineated,' says Bentham, 'for the first time, a plain as well as a true standard for whatever is right or wrong, useful, useless, or mischievous in human conduct, whether in the field of morals or of politics.' The famous phrase was used first by Hutcheson (1726), then in Italian by Beccaria, and was found by Priestley in a translation of Beccaria's Crimes and Punishments 6 (1766); but unhappily Priestley, Bentham, and the rest have none of them given a final and universal definition of human happiness. To ensure it, Bentham considered it necessary to reconstruct the laws and government—to have annual parliaments and universal suffrage, secret voting, and a return to the ancient practice of paying wages to parliamentary representatives. In all his political, sociological, and juridical writings this doctrine of utility, so understood, is the leading and pervading principle. In 1778 he published a pamphlet on The Hard Labour Bill, recommending an improvement in the mode of criminal punishment; amongst those that followed were Letters on Usury (1787), Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Politics (1789), Discourses on Civil and Penal Legislation (1802), Punishments and Rewards (1811), A Treatise on Judicial Evidence (1813), Codification and Public Instruction (1817), and The Book of Fallacies (1824). The article in the National Dictionary of Biography quotes a classified list of seventy-four publications. By the death of his father in 1792, Bentham succeeded to property in London and to farms in Essex yielding from £500 to £600 a year. He lived frugally, but with elegance, in one of his London houses, kept young men as secretaries, corresponded and wrote daily, and by a life of temperance and industry, with great self-complacency and the society of a few devoted friends, the eccentric philosopher attained to the age of eighty-four. He left his body to be dissected, and his skeleton, clothed in his usual attire, is preserved in University College, London. His works were collected and edited by Bowring and Hill Burton, and published in eleven volumes. But as some of the works were rearranged, abridged, and altered by Bowring and others, it is sometimes doubtful how far the statements perfectly represent Bentham's own words or ideas. Originally Bentham's style was natural, clear, and even brilliant. In his later works he adopted a peculiar uncouth style and nomenclature, which deter ordinary readers, and indeed have rendered many of his works a dead-letter. The substance of his published works and MSS. was rearranged and translated into excellent French by M. Dumont, a Genevese disciple, and there were Spanish and Portuguese translations. James Mill made known his principles at home; Sir Samuel Romilly discussed and criticised them in the Edinburgk Review, and Sir James Mackintosh in his Ethical Dissertation. Of his new coined words it should be noted that some-such as codify, minimise, international-have been found useful, and have become an essential and permanent part of the English language. In the science of legislation Bentham exhibited profound capacity and extensive knowledge; but he is chargeable with not sufficiently 'weighing the various circumstances which require his rules to be modified in different countries and times, in order to render them either more useful, more easily introduced, more generally respected, or more certainly executed.' J. S. Mill declared : 'There is hardly anything in Bentham's philosophy which is not true. The bad part of his writings is his resolute denial of all that he does not see, of all truths but those which he recognises.' This does not fully indicate the fact that he was both dogmatic and intolerant, holding that those who deliberately differed from him were either fools or knaves. He greatly furthered the improvement of the lamentable poor-laws; like so many of the older Radicals, he held that both for England and France, colonies are disadvantageous to the mother-country, and should be emancipated. Many of his schemes have been realised; many more are in course of realisation. The end and object of them all was the general welfare, and his chief error lay in conceiving that organic changes are possible by manifesto and enactment, or otherwise than through the growth and modification of popular needs, ideas, and institutions. In Mill's words, he found the philosophy of law a chaos, and left it a science;' and he was the philosophic pioneer of Liberalism and of Radicalism. From the 'Defence of Usury.' The business of a money-lender, though only among Christians and in Christian times a proscribed profession, has nowhere, nor at any time, been a popular one. Those who have the resolution to sacrifice the present to the future, are natural objects of envy to those who have sacrificed the future to the present. The children who have eaten their cake are the natural enemies of the children who have theirs. While the money is hoped for, and for a short time after it has been received, he who lends it is a friend and benefactor: by the time the money is spent, and the evil hour of reckoning is come, the benefactor is found to have changed his nature, and to have put on the tyrant and the oppressor. It is an oppression for a man to reclaim his own money; it is none to keep it from him. Among the inconsiderate -that is, among the great mass of mankind-selfish affections conspire with the social in treasuring up all favour for the man of dissipation, and in refusing justice to the man of thrift who has supplied him. In some shape or other, that favour attends the chosen object of it through every stage of his career. But in no stage of his career can the man of thrift come in for any share of it. It is the general interest of those with whom a man lives, that his expense should be at least as great as his circumstances will bear; because there are few expenses which a man can launch into but what the benefit of them is shared, in some proportion or other, by those with whom he lives. In that circle originates a standing law forbidding every man, on pain of infamy, to confine his expenses within what is adjudged to be the measure of his means, saving always the power of exceeding that limit as much as he thinks proper; and the means assigned him by that law may be ever so much beyond his real means, but are sure never to fall short of them. So close is the combination thus formed between the idea of merit and the idea of expenditure, that a disposition to spend finds favour in the eyes even of those who know that a man's circumstances do not entitle him to the means: and an upstart, whose chief recommendation is this disposition, shall find himself to have purchased a permanent fund of respect, to the prejudice of the very persons at whose expense he has been gratifying his appetites and his pride. The lustre which the display of borrowed wealth has diffused over his character awes men during the season of his prosperity into a submission to his insolence, and when the hand of adversity has overtaken him at last, the recollection of the height from which he has fallen throws the veil of compassion over his injustice. His The condition of the man of thrift is the reverse. lasting opulence procures him a share, at least, of the same envy that attends the prodigal's transient display: but the use he makes of it procures him no part of the favour which attends the prodigal. In the satisfactions he derives from that use-the pleasure of possession, and the idea of enjoying at some distant period, which may never arrive-nobody comes in for any share. In the midst of his opulence he is regarded as a kind of insolvent, who refuses to honour the bills which their rapacity would draw upon him, and who is by so much the more criminal than other insolvents, as not having the plea of inability for an excuse. Could there be any doubt of the disfavour which attends the cause of the money-lender in his competition with the borrower, and of the disposition of the public judgment to sacrifice the interest of the former to that of the latter, the stage would afford a compendious but a pretty conclusive proof of it. It is the business of the dramatist to study, and to conform to, the humours and passions of those on the pleasing of whom he depends for his success; it is the course which reflection must suggest to every man, and which a man would naturally fall into, though he were not to think about it. He may, and very frequently does, make magnificent pretences of giving the law to them: but woe be to him that attempts to give to them any other law than what they are disposed already to receive! If he would attempt to lead them one inch, it must be with great caution, and not without suffering himself to be led by them at least a dozen. Now I question whether, among all the instances in which a borrower and a lender of money have been brought together upon the stage, from the days of Thespis to the present, there ever was one in which the former was not recommended to favour in some shape or other-either to admiration, or to love, or to pity, or to all three-and the other, the man of thrift, consigned to infamy. From Bentham's 'Commonplace Book.' 'O Locke first master of intellectual truth! without whom those who have taught me would have been as nothing! let thy blest spirit, if now it looketh down upon the affairs of men, acknowledge my obedience to the first great lesson of thy life, in the assertion of independence, and make its report in my favour to the Throne, the Judgment-seat above. Priestley was the first (unless it was Beccaria) who taught my lips to pronounce this sacred truth:-That the greatest happiness of the greatest number is the foundation of morals and legislation. Johnson is the pompous vamper of commonplace morality-of phrases often trite without being true. . . . When the truths in a man's book, though many and important, are fewer than the errors; when his ideas, though the means of producing clear ones in other men, are found to be themselves not clear, that book must die: Montesquieu must therefore die : he must die, as his great countryman, Descartes, had died before him: he must wither as the blade withers when the corn is ripe : he must die, but let tears of gratitude and admiration bedew his grave. O Montesquieu ! the British constitution, whose death thou prophesiedst, will live longer than thy work, yet not longer than thy fame. Not even the incense of the illustrious Catharine can preserve thee. Locke-dry, cold, languid, wearisome, will live for ever. Montesquieu-rapid, brilliant, glorious, enchanting-will not outlive his century. I know-I feel -I pity-and blush at the enjoyment of a liberty which the birth-place of that great writer (great with all his faults) forbade him to enjoy. I could make an immense book upon the defects of Montesquieu-I could make not a small one upon his excellencies. It might be worth while to make both, if Montesquieu could live.' See Life by Bowring in the collected works (in twenty-two parts, 1838-43; issued in 1844 in eleven volumes, with Introduction by J. H. Burton), and Burton's Benthamiana (1843). William Godwin, inventor than propagandist; and his character of Falkland is one of the most striking in the whole range of English fiction. But the political views he shared were soon brought still more aggressively forward. His friends, Holcroft, Thelwall, Horne Tooke, and others, were arrested and tried on a charge of high treason. Godwin had apparently not been formally associated with their societies, and however obnoxious to those in power, had not rendered himself amenable to the laws of his country. Yet if we may credit a curious entry in Sir Walter Scott's diary, he must have been early mixed up with the English Jacobins. Scott declared that Canning, while in the Temple, was startled out of somewhat revolutionary opinions by a visit from Godwin, who told him to his astonishment that, in expectation of a new order of things, the English Jacobins designed to place him, Canning, at the head of the revolution. He was much struck, and asked time to think what course he should take; and having thought the matter over, he went to Mr Pitt, and made the Anti-Jacobin confession of faith.' This must have been before 1793. In any case Godwin was ready with his pen in his friends' defence. Judge Eyre, in his charge to the grand jury, had laid down principles very different from his, and he instantly published Cursory Strictures on the judge's charge, so ably written that the pamphlet is said to have mainly led to the acquittal of the accused. In 1796 Godwin issued a series of essays on Education, Manners, and Literature, entitled The Inquirer; in August 1797 he married Mary Wollstonecraft, who died five months later after giving birth to a daughter (Mrs Shelley). Godwin's contempt of the ordinary English modes of thinking and acting was displayed by this marriage. His wife brought with her a natural daughter by a former protector, and had lived with Godwin for some time before their marriage: 'The principal motive,' he says, 'for complying with the ceremony was the circumstance of Mary's being in a state of pregnancy.' In the Memoirs of Mary Wollstone author of Caleb Williams, was born at Wisbeach in Cambridgeshire, 3rd March 1756, the seventh of the thirteen children of John Godwin (1723-72), a Dissenting minister, who moved to Debenham in 1758, and in 1760 to Guestwick in Norfolk. After three years' schooling at Hindolveston, three more with a tutor at Norwich, and one as usher in his former school, Godwin in 1773 entered Hoxton Presbyterian College, in 1778 quitted it as pure a Sandemanian and Tory as he had gone in. But during a five years' ministry at Ware, Stowmarket, and Beaconsfield, he turned Socinian and Republican, and by 1787 was a 'complete unbeliever.' Meanwhile he had taken to literature, in 1783-84 writing three novels for £42, a Life of Chatham, and Sketches of History, in Six Sermons. In 1785 he became principal writer in the New Annual Register. The French Revolution gave him an opening, and his Enquiry concerning Political Justice, and its Influences on General Virtue and Happiness (2 vols. 4to, 1793), brought him fame, widespread influence, the leadership of a school of thought, and a thousand guineas. It was calmly sub-craft Godwin, now written by him, all the details versive of everything (law and 'marriage, the worst of all laws'); but as it preached down violence, and was deemed caviare to the multitude, its author escaped prosecution. In Things as they Are, or the Adventures of Caleb Williams (1794), Godwin's aim was to inculcate his characteristic doctrines, and to comprehend 'a general review of the modes of domestic and unrecorded despotism by which man becomes the destroyer of man.' His hero tells his own tale of suffering and of wrong—of innocence persecuted and reduced to the brink of death and infamy by aristocratic power, and by tyrannical or partially administered laws; but his story is so full of interest and vigour that the reader loses sight of the political object and the implied satire, and thinks only of the characters and incidents. The imagination of the novelist overpowered his philosophy; he was a greater of her life and conduct are minutely related. In 1799 appeared his St Leon, a story of the 'miraculous,' and designed to illustrate human feelings and passions in incredible situations. His hero attains the possession of the philosopher's stone, and secures exhaustless wealth by transmuting the baser metals into gold; at the same time he learns the secret of the elixir vita, by which he has the power of renewing his youth. The romance has many attractions-splendid description and true pathos; its chief defect is an excess of the terrible. In 1800 Godwin produced his unlucky tragedy of Antonio; in 1801, Thoughts on Dr Parr's Spital Sermon, a reply to attacks made upon him, or on his code of morality, by Parr, Mackintosh, and others. In 1803 he brought out a Life of Chaucer, in two quartos. The Life of Chaucer was ridiculed by Scott in the Edinburgh Review for its enormous |