Page images
PDF
EPUB
[ocr errors]

The Appendix contains all the important Statutes

applicable to the use of vehicles of every

class

upon

the highways.

Wherever possible, the term “Motor Car” has
been used in the place of the term “Light Loco-
motive,” which is employed in the Act of 1896.

H. G. FARRANT.

[blocks in formation]
[blocks in formation]

ways Co.

173

Baldwin v. L. C. & D. Rly. 180

Barber v.

Callow

35

Penley

166
Barnett v. Hoo Local Board 169
Bather v. Day....

178

Batson v. Donovan

181

Baxendale r. G. E. Rly.

18

Bayley v. M. S. & L. Rly. 150

Beard v. L. G. 0. Co.

150

Beauchamp, In re

143

Belt v. Lawes .

143

Benjamin v. Storr

163

Blake v. M. Rail. Co.

155

Blakemore v. Bristol and Exeter

Rly.

175

Blower v. G. W. Rly.

180

Blyth v. Birmingham Water-

works Co.

134, 140

Boss v. Litton

137

Bradburn v. G. W. Rail. Co... 155

Brady v. Giles

151, 153
Brind v. Dale

179
Bringloe v. Morrice

173

Brocklehurst v. Manchester, &c.

Tramways Co.

142

Brotherton v. Tittensor..

165

Brown v. Eastern and Midlands

Rail. Co.

142, 164

Butterworth v. Brownlow 181

Caledonian Rail. Co. v. Mulhol-

land

Caley's Case

Case v. Storey

Cavill v. Amos

Chaplin v. Hawes

135

177

95

90

137

[merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors]

Hammack v. White

135

Harris v. Mobbs. ...142, 163, 164

Harrison v. L. B. & S. C. Rly... 183
Hart v. Baxendale

180
Hatton v. Treeby

11, 42
Hawkes v. Smith

181
Hawkins v. Cooper

137
v. Edwards

. 7, 88
Heath v. Brewer

66, 98
Heaven v. Pender

135
Hemsworth Rural District Coun-
cil v. Mickelthwaite

170

Henderson v. Stephenson 181

Hetherington v. N. E. Rail. Co. 155

Hickman v. Birch

Hill v. New River Co.

164

v. Thomas

168, 169

Hinton v. Dibbin

183
Houghton's Case

153
Hyman v. Nye

178

M'Dowall v. G. W.R. Co..... 151
Manzoni v. Douglas

135

Markey v. Tolworth Joint Hos-

pital, &c.

.... .156, 160, 171

Martin v. Great Indian, &c. Rly. 181
Mayhew v. Sutton

40, 165

Medawar v. Grand Hotel Co. .. 177

Metcalfe v. L. & B. Rly.

182
Metrop. Rail. Co. v. Jackson 136
Mills v. Armstrong (The Ber-
nina)

. 146, 150
Milne v. Maclennan

188
Mitcham, Ex parte

97
Moorcock, The

176
Morgan v. L. G. 0. Co.

157

Mulliner v. Florence

178

.6, 35

[blocks in formation]

Keen v. Henry

.99, 152

Kelly v. Met. Rail. Co.

150

Kent County Council v. Lord
Gerard

..169, 170

« EelmineJätka »