1907. On May 26, employees went on Differences amicably arranged B. INDUSTRIES OTHER THAN MINES, AGENCIES OF TRANSPORTATION AND COMMUNICATION, AND OTHER PUBLIC UTILITIES." Aug. 26 Montreal Cotton Co. Employees.. Valleyfield, Que and employees. bec. 2,200 Concerning conditions and wages. 1907. 1907. The employees went on strike on Aug. 13, and the good offices of the department were requested with a view to effecting a settlement. Mr. F. A. Acland, the then secre tary of the department, and Mr. V. Du Breuil, fair-wages officer, visited the scene of the dispute and explained the provisions of the act to the parties, with special reference to the sections enabling a dispute in any industry other than that of a mine or public utility to be referred, by mutual agreement between the disputing parties, to a board of conciliation and investigation. As a result of the explanations and efforts at conciliation on the part of the officers of the department, an application for a board was forwarded to the minister, the employees in the meantime returning to work on Aug. 26. The board was duly established, with the result that the differences were adjusted and an agreement concluded before the board dating from Sept. 17, 1907, to be effective until May 4, 1908, and thereafter until either side be given a written notice of cancellation of the same. A feature of the agreement was the establishment of a permanent committee of conciliation to which it was agreed that all subsequent disputes should be referred. PROCEEDINGS 1908-9. Statement of applications for bourds of conciliation and investigation and of proceedings thereunder from Apr. 1, 1908, to Mar. 31, 1909-Continued. A.-MINES, AGENCIES OF TRANSPORTATION AND COMMUNICATION, AND OTHER PUBLIC-SERVICE UTILITIES. [Appointed by the minister: 1. Under sec. 8, subsec. 1, of the I. D. I. act, on recommendation from party concerned, 2. Under sec. 8, subsec. 2, of the I. D. I. act, in the absence of a recommendation from party concerned. 3. Under sec. 8, subsec. 3, of the I. D. I. act, on the joint recommendation of the two members first appointed. 4. Under sec. 8, subsec. 4, of the I. D. I. act, in the absence of a joint recommendation by the two members first appointed.] Company had previously made An agreement concluded before No board was established in this case, the parties having come to an amicable agreement subsequent to forwarding the application, a strike being thereby averted. Do. 1908. June 19 Smith (E), 1; F. H.Sherman (M), Hon. Judge Mc- June 8 July 2| A unanimous report was made Gillivray (c), 3; Geo. S. Camp bell (E), 1; Jas. Macdonald (M), 1. .do Chignecto, N. S.... 200 ..do. Rev. Chas. Wilson July 6 July 27 ..do. Lundbreck, Alta.. 30 (c), 3; B. Barn hill (E), 1; R. B. Murray (M), 1. by the board with recommen- An agreement was effected be- Chas. Simister (C), Nov. 25 Dec. 14 The board presented a unani 3; F. B. Smith, C. E. (E), 1: Jas. A. McDonald (M), 1. Hon. Judge Wallace (C), 4; G. S. Campbell (E), 2; Daniel McDougall (M), 1. 1909. Mar. 22 mous report recommending a Proceedings unfinished. Prof. S. J. Mac- Aug. 22 Aug. 29 Unanimous report presented lean (C),4; E. L. Fraleck (E), 1; C.B.Duke(M),1. by board making recom- Statement of applications for boards of conciliation and investigation and of proceedings thereunder from Apr. 1, 1908, to Mar. 31, 1909.-Continued. 1 Mr. Fullerton, finding himself at an early stage of the proceedings unable to agree with his colleagues, resigned from the board, and the company declining to make a further recommendation, the Minister appointed Mr. Galt without recommendation. 2 Owing to inability of Mr. R. E. Finn to act as member of board, Mr. J. G. O'Donoghue was appointed in his stead. |