Hypocrisy: Ethical InvestigationsBroadview Press, 10. mai 2004 - 352 pages Shortlisted for 2004 Saskatchewan Book Award: Best Scholarly Writing What is a hypocrite? What role does hypocrisy play in our lives? Why is it thought to be such an ugly vice? Is it ever acceptable? What do we lose in our indifference to it? Hypocrisy: Ethical Investigations seeks to illuminate the concept of hypocrisy by exploring its multiple roles in our moral and political lives and struggles. The authors provide a critical examination of a wide range of perspectives on the nature, varieties, and significance of hypocrisy, arguing that it is a key concept in the investigation of the field of morality in general, including its moralizing excesses. |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 70
Page
Sorry, this page's content is restricted.
Sorry, this page's content is restricted.
Page
Sorry, this page's content is restricted.
Sorry, this page's content is restricted.
Page
Sorry, this page's content is restricted.
Sorry, this page's content is restricted.
Page
Sorry, this page's content is restricted.
Sorry, this page's content is restricted.
Page
Sorry, this page's content is restricted.
Sorry, this page's content is restricted.
Contents
Acknowledgments | |
HistoricalSketchofaConcept | |
PART | |
Politics and Hypocrisy | |
Hypocrisy and Deception | |
13 | |
14 | |
Irony and Hypocrisy | |
The Complex FigureofSocrates | |
Socrates Style and | |
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
acceptable account of hypocrisy accusations of hypocrisy actions andthe appear argued argument Aristotelian Aristotle Aristotle’s audience behaviour Béla Szabados believe Bernard Williams Cambremer canbe claim complacent concept of hypocrisy concerned condemnation consequences consequentialism consequentialist consider conventional deceive deception deontologist discussion distinction doesnot double standards egoist ethical ethical egoism evaluation example fact Furthermore genuine his/her human hypocrite Ibid important insincerity integrity interests interpretation inthe inthis involves ironic isnot itis judgment Judith Shklar Kant Kant’s Kittay Ludwig Wittgenstein McKinnon mean mightbe moral criticism motives Nicomachean Ethics ofhypocrisy ofthe one’s oneself onthe passage people’s perhaps person Pharisees philosophical political politicians possible preaches pretending principles problem psychological egoism question R.M. Hare reason relevant s/he seems self-deception self-interest sense Shklar simply social Socratic irony sort sortof sucha suggests Tartuffe thatthe thatthey thereby things Thrasymachus tobe tolerance tothe Turner understand vice virtue virtue ethics Vlastos