The Exchequer Reports: Reports of Cases Argued and Determined in the Courts of Exchequer & Exchequer Chamber ... Easter Term, 19 Vict., to [Hilary Vacation, 25 Vict.] Both Inclusive [1856-1862], 2. köideH. Sweet, W. Maxwell, and V. & R. Stevens & G. S. Norton, 1858 |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 100
Page vi
... Railway Com- Doeg , Gibson v . Eastern Counties Railway Company , Marriage v . Eastwood , Edmonds v . - 625 - 811 Edmonds v . Eastwood - 811 Ellis , Entwisle v . v . London and South Western Railway Com- 549 - 615 Halkett , Glover v ...
... Railway Com- Doeg , Gibson v . Eastern Counties Railway Company , Marriage v . Eastwood , Edmonds v . - 625 - 811 Edmonds v . Eastwood - 811 Ellis , Entwisle v . v . London and South Western Railway Com- 549 - 615 Halkett , Glover v ...
Page vii
... Railway Company , Ellis · M'Manus v . Lancashire and Yorkshire Railway Com- Maidenhead Board of Health , Manchester , Mayor , Alder- - Parke , Warburton v . Parks , Whitehead v . Jones , Boulton v . v . Clarke ... Railway Company - 451.
... Railway Company , Ellis · M'Manus v . Lancashire and Yorkshire Railway Com- Maidenhead Board of Health , Manchester , Mayor , Alder- - Parke , Warburton v . Parks , Whitehead v . Jones , Boulton v . v . Clarke ... Railway Company - 451.
Page viii
... Railway Company and Eastern Counties Railway Com- pany v . Tamplin v . Pritchard , Foster v . 71 · 687 Shaw v . Stenton 204 19 - 319 - 540 57 - 858 42 Sidwell v . Mason - 306 - 735 Simson , Huntley v . - - 600 - 363 Simpson , Bell v ...
... Railway Company and Eastern Counties Railway Com- pany v . Tamplin v . Pritchard , Foster v . 71 · 687 Shaw v . Stenton 204 19 - 319 - 540 57 - 858 42 Sidwell v . Mason - 306 - 735 Simson , Huntley v . - - 600 - 363 Simpson , Bell v ...
Page 158
... railway Com- pany , for the purposes of their railway . On the 27th of June , 1854 , the owner SMALLEY V. THE BLACKBURN RAILWAY COMPANY . TRESPASS for mesne profits . Pleas . - First : Not guilty . Second . That the land was not the ...
... railway Com- pany , for the purposes of their railway . On the 27th of June , 1854 , the owner SMALLEY V. THE BLACKBURN RAILWAY COMPANY . TRESPASS for mesne profits . Pleas . - First : Not guilty . Second . That the land was not the ...
Page 164
... Company had taken possession of the land , it was supposed that they were not entitled to it , and an action of ejectment was brought , which , with all matters in difference , was RAILWAY CO . referred . The reference was not merely as ...
... Company had taken possession of the land , it was supposed that they were not entitled to it , and an action of ejectment was brought , which , with all matters in difference , was RAILWAY CO . referred . The reference was not merely as ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
20 Vict act of parliament action adjudication aforesaid alleged amount appeared apply assigns attorney authority bill Bramwell breach bridge canal carrier charter-party claim Clauses Commissioners common law contract County Court Court of equity Court of Exchequer covenant creditor damage debt declaration deed defendant defendant's delivered demised discharged duty Eastern Counties Railway entered entitled evidence Exch execution executors fact ground heirs held Hugh Hill indenture issue judgment jury justice Lake Lothing land tax learned Judge liable London Lord Lowestoft Martin matter ment navigation notice opinion Oulton Broad owner paid parcel parish parties payable payment person plaintiff plea Pollock possession premises purchase purpose question Railway Company reasonable recover referred refused rent repair respect river rivers Wensum rule shareholders sheriff shew cause ship statute SWANSEA CANAL term testator thereof tion verdict vessel warrant Western Railway words writ youngest
Popular passages
Page 209 - ... construct gasworks and to supply gas and sell and dispose of the coke ; the surplus profits to go in reduction of the water-rates and otherwise towards the improvement of the town. In an action against the defendants, the declaration alleged that they employed workmen to lay down the pipes, who so negligently conducted themselves that a piece of metal was projected against the plaintiff. The defendants pleaded, that the grievances were...