 The tax on Government stock is thought by this court to be a tax on the contract, a tax on the power to borrow money on the credit of the United States, and consequently to be repugnant to the Constitution.  Revue légale - Page 1631885Full view - About this book
 | United States. Supreme Court, Richard Peters - 1829 - 758 lehte
...state was supposed to be placed in the same condition with property acquired by an individual. The tax on government stock is thought by this Court to be a tax on the contract, a tax on the power to borrow money on the credit of the United States, and consequently to be repugnant to the constitution.... | |
 | Joseph Blunt - 1830 - 646 lehte
...state was supposed to be placed in the same condition wiiii property acquired by an individual. The tax on government stock is thought by this court to be a tax on the contract, a tax on the power ta borrow money on the credit of the United States, and consequently to be repugnant to the constitution.... | |
 | Joseph Blunt - 1835 - 624 lehte
...state was supposed to be placed in the same condition with property acquired by an individual. The tax on government stock is thought by this court to be a tax on the contract, a tax on the power to borrow money on the credit of the United States, and consequently to be repugnant to the constitution.... | |
 | Joseph Blunt - 1830 - 628 lehte
...state was supposed to be placed in the same condition with property acquired by an individual. The tax on government stock is thought by this court to be a tax on the contract, a tax on the power to borrow money on the credit of the United States, and consequently to be repugnant to the constitution.... | |
 | John Marshall - 1839 - 762 lehte
...state was supposed to be placed in the same condition with property acquired by an individual. The tax on government stock is thought by this court to be a tax on the contract, a tax on the power to borrow money on the credit of the United States, and, consequently, to be repugnant to the constitution.... | |
 | George Van Santvoord - 1854 - 550 lehte
...minority of the Court. In pronouncing the prevailing opinion of the Court, the Chief-Justice says : " The tax on government stock is thought by this Court to be a tax on the contract, a tax on the power to borrow money on the credit of the United States, and consequently to be repugnant to the Constitution/'... | |
 | George Van Santvoord - 1854 - 554 lehte
...pronouncing the prevailing opinion of the Court, the Chief-Justice says : " The tax on govcrntn'eQt stock is thought by this Court to be a tax on the contract, a tax on the power to borrow money on the credit of the United States, and consequently to be repugnant to the Constitution."... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court, Benjamin Robbins Curtis - 1864 - 536 lehte
...State was supposed to be placed in the same condition with property acquired by an individual. The tax on government stock is thought by this court to be a tax on the contract, a tax on the power to borrow money on the credit of the United States, and consequently to be repugnant to the constitution.... | |
 | New York (State). Court of Appeals, George Franklin Comstock, Henry Rogers Selden, Francis Kernan, Erasmus Peshine Smith, Joel Tiffany, Edward Jordan Dimock, Samuel Hand, Hiram Edward Sickels, Louis J. Rezzemini, Edmund Hamilton Smith, Edwin Augustus Bedell, Alvah S. Newcomb, James Newton Fiero - 1866 - 724 lehte
...State, was supposed to be placed in the same condition -with property acquired by an individual. The tax on government stock is thought by this court to be a tax on the contract, a tax on the power to borrow money on the credit of the United States, and consequently to be repugnant to the Constitution."... | |
 | New York (State). Court of Appeals, Joel Tiffany - 1868 - 1050 lehte
...the Supreme Court of the United States. The Court held the tax to be unconstitutional, saying : " The tax on government stock is thought by this Court to be a tax on the contract, a tax Opinion by HUNT, J. on the power to borrow money on the credit of the United States, and consequently... | |
| |
