Page images

which I believe has acted in the case of man, and they were purposely chosen to show, that I reject the hypothesis of “first causes” for any and every special effect in the universe, except in the same sense that the action of man or of any other intelligent being is a first cause. In using such terms I wished to show plainly, that I contemplated the possibility that the development of the essentially human portions of man’s structure and intellect may have been determined by the directing influence of some higher intelligent beings, acting through natural and universal laws. A belief of this nature may or may not have a foundation, but it is an intelligible theory, and is not, in its nature, incapable of proof; and it rests on facts and arguments of an exactly similar kind to those, which would enable a sufficiently powerful intellect to deduce, from the existence on the earth of cultivated plants and domestic animals, the

presence of some intelligent being of a higher nature than themselves.

NOTE. B. (Page 365.)

A friend has suggested that I have not here explained myself sufficiently, and objects, that life does not exist in matter any more than consciousness, and if the one can be produced by the laws of matter, why may not the other ? I reply, that there is a radical difference between the two. Organic or vegetative life consists essentially in chemical transformations and molecular motions, occurring under certain conditions and in a certain order. The matter, and the forces which act upon it, are for the most part known ; and if there are any forces engaged in the manifestation of vegetative life yet undiscovered (which is a moot question), we can conceive them as analogous to such forces as heat, electricity, or chemical affinity, with which we are already acquainted. We can thus clearly conceive of the transition from dead matter to living matter. A complex mass which suffers decomposition or decay is dead, but if this mass has the power of attracting to itself, from the surrounding medium, matter like that of which it is composed, we have the first rudiment of vegetative life. If the mass can do this for a considerable time, and if its absorption of new matter more than replaces that lost by decomposition, and if it is of such a nature as to resist the mechanical or chemical forces to which it is usually exposed, and to retain a tolerably constant form, we term it a living organism. We can conceive an organism to be so Constituted, and we can further conceive that any fragments, which may be accidentally broken from it, or which may fall away when its bulk has become too great for the cohesion of all its parts, may begin to increase anew and run the same course as the parent mass. This is growth and reproduction in their simplest forms; and from such a simple beginning it is possible to conceive a series of slight modifications of composition, and of internal and external forces, which should ultimately lead to the development of more complex Organisms. The LIFE of such an organism may, perhaps, be nothing added to it, but merely the name we give to the result of a balance of internal and external forces in maintaining the permanence of the form and structure of the individual. The simplest conceivable form of such life would be the dewdrop, which owes its existence to the balance between the condensation of aqueous vapour in the atmosphere and the evaporation of its substance. If either is in excess, it soon ceases to maintain an individual existence. I do not maintain that vegetative life is wholly due to such a complex balance of forces, but only that it is conceivable as such. With CONSCIOUSNESs the case is very different. Its phenomena are not comparable with those of any kind of matter subjected to any of the known or conceivable forces of nature; and we cannot conceive a gradual transition from absolute unconsciousness to consciousness, from an unsentient organism to a sentient being. The merest rudiment of sensation or self-consciousness is infinitely removed from absolutely non-sentient or unconscious matter. We can conceive of no physical addition to, or modification of, an unconscious mass which should create consciousness; no step in the series of changes organised matter may undergo, which should bring in sensation where there was no sensation or power of sensation at the preceding step. It is because the things are utterly incomparable and incommensurable that we can only conceive of sensation coming to matter from without, while life may be conceived as merely a specific combination and co-ordination of the matter and the forces that compose the universe, and with which we are separately acquainted. We may admit with Professor Huxley that protoplasm is the “matter of life” and the cause of organisation, but we cannot admit or conceive that protoplasm is the primary source of sensation and consciousness, or that it can ever of itself become conscious in the same way as we may perhaps conceive that it may become alive.



ABRAXAS grossulariata, 119.
Acanthotritus dorsalis, 94.
Accipiter pileatus, 107.
ACREIDE, the subjects of mimicry,
85, 86.
Acronycta psi, protective colouring
of, 62.
ADAPTATION brought about by gene-
ral laws, 276; looks like design,
AEGERIIDE mimic Hymenoptera,
AGASSIz, or embryonic character of
ancient animals, 301.
Agnia fasciata, mimics another
Longicorn, 95.
Agriopis aprilina, protective colour-
ing of, 62.
ALCEDINIDAE, sexual colouring and
nidification of, 240.
AMADINA, sexual colouring and ni-
dification of, 243.

AMPELIDE, sexual colouring and

nidification of, 243.
Angraocum Sesquipedale, 272; its
fertilization by a large moth,
275. -
ANIMALs, senses and faculties of,
127; intellect of, compared with
that of Savages, 341.
ANIsocFRINE, 92.
ANOA, 196.

ANTHRIBIDAE, mimicry of, 94; di-
morphism in, 155.
Anthrocera filipendula, 120.
ANTHROPOLOGISTs, wide difference
of opinion among, as to origin
of human races, 304; conflict-
ing views of, harmonized, 321.
ANTIQUITY of man, 303, 322.
APPARENT exceptions to law of co-
lour and nidification, 253.
AQUATIC birds, why abundant, 32.
Araschnia prorsa, 154.
ARCHITECTURE of most nations de-
rivative, 228; Grecian, false in
principle, 226.
ARCTIC animals, white colour of,
50, 51.
ARGYLL, Duke of, on colours of
Woodcock, 53; on mind in ma-
ture, 265; criticism on Darwin's
works, 269; on humming birds
282; on creation by birth, 287.
ASILUs, 97. .
ASPECTs of nature as influencing
man's development, 317.


IBALANCE in nature, 42.

I3ARRINGTON, Hon. Taines, on song
of birds, 220.

« EelmineJätka »