Birmingham, Bristol and Thames Junction Railway Com pany v. White .. Bishop v. North Bishop of Durham, Exparte Bishop of Ely, Exparte Blain v. Agar .. PAGE 252, 362 79 229,230 229 22 Blakemore v. Glamorganshire Canal Company 62, 74, 128, 129, 130, 131, 149, 382, 407, 408 Bligh v. Brent .. Bourne v. Freeth 254 23 Boxmoor, Exparte, Trustees of Waste Lands in re Birming 232 378 312 254, 257 Bridge v. Grand Junction Railway Company Calder and Hebble Navigation Company v. Pilling Carpue v. London and Brighton Railway Company..325, 326, Cary v. Mathews 212, 213 246 .. 247 371 Cator v. Croydon Canal Company Chadwick v. Clarke Charitable Corporation v. Sutton Cheltenham and Great Western Union Railway Company v. Daniel Cheltenham and Great Western Union Railway Company v. Fry Cheltenham Railway Company v. Price Child v. Hudson's Bay Company 137 Church v. Imperial Gas Light and Coke Company Clarke v. Imperial Gas Light and Coke Company 71, 73, 82, 169, 243, 252 Coats v. Clarence Railway Company 90 44 Collinson v. Newcastle and Darlington Railway Company, 99, Cook v. Aylesbury Railway Company Company Corporation of Trinity House, Exparte PAGE 232 Corrigall v. London and Blackwall Railway Company, 201, 202, 204, 208, 210, 219, 220, 227 Cory v. Norwich and Yarmouth Railway Company 410,415, 416 Cromford Railway Company v. Lacey..61, 67, 277, 279, 280, Dickman v. Blackwall Railway Company Doe d. Bryan v. Bancks Doe d. Fisher v. Roe 282, 360 242, 268 37, 46, 53, 249, 250 348 Doe d. Hutchinson v. Manchester, Bury and Rossendale Doe d. Myatt v. The St. Helen's and Runcorn Gap Railway Company 216 126, 244 Doe d. Payne v. The Bristol and Exeter Railway Com pany Doe d. Wawn v. Horn Doo v. London and Croydon Railway Company Draper v. Shurmer Dudley Canal Company v. Grazebrook Doubleday v. Muskett' 177 163, 199 303 120 56 Dun Navigation Company v. North Midland Railway Company Duncuft v. Albrecht Dundalk Western Railway Company v. Tapster Eastern Counties Railway Company v. Cooke .. 257, 264 350, 356 242 Edinburgh and Dalkeith Railway Company v. Wauchope Edinburgh and Leith Railway Company v. Dawson Edinburgh, Leith and Newhaven Railway Company v. Edwards v. Grand Junction Railway Company Elkington v. Fergusson Ellison v. Bignold Elwell v. Grand Junction Railway Company Ely, (Bishop of), Exparte Eton College, (Provost of), &c. Exparte Company PAGE 290, 352, 354, 355 163 55 Eton College, (Provost of), &c. v. Great Western Railway .. Evans v. Dublin and Drogheda Railway Company Farrow v. Vansittart Fisher v. Thames Junction Railway Company.. Gardner, Exparte, in re The Eastern Counties Railway Gibbons v. Waterloo Bridge Company Gordon v. Cheltenham and Great Western Railway Com pany Grainge, Exparte Grand Junction Railway Company v. White 118, 107, 409, 410 223 122, 363 Great North of England Railway Company v. Biddulph ..281, 294, 295, 351 Great North of England, &c., Railway Company v. Clarence Railway Company 89, 111, S67, S69, 408, 410 Great Western Railway Company Amendment Act, in re 225 Green v. Barrett Hall v. Mayor, &c., of Swansea.. Hammon v. South Eastern Railway Company Hancock v. Hodgson Hannuic v. Goldner Hare v. Waring 262 165, 166, 408, 413 137 . 182 246 256, 260 258,260,261 Hargreaves v. Lancaster and Preston Junction Railway Company . 63, 164, 165, 166 PAGE 257 271 46, 57 Hawthorn v. Newcastle-upon-Tyne and North Shields Railway Company Hemmingway v. Fernandez 145, 146, 148, 177, 587 Her Majesty's Attorney-General v. The London and South 2,3 Hill v. Manchester and Salford Waterworks Company Hichens v. Congreve 35 Horne, Exparte Holmes v. Higgins Hope v. Newcastle and Darlington Railway Company Hornby v. Houlditch Howden (Lord) v. Simpson 43 179 283 249,274 58, 59, 60 Huddersfield Canal Company v. Buckley 283 Humble v. Langston 259, 260, 261, 263, 266, 286, 288 Humble v. Mitchell 257, 263 172, 215 308 Hyde v. Great Western Railway Company Hyde v. Trent and Mersey Navigation Company Illingworth v. Manchester and Leeds Railway Company Imperial Gas Light Company v. Clarke Innocent v. North Midland Railway Company Issauchaud, Exparte 245, 252, 349 85, 186, 187, 191, 407 217, 219, 223 46, 47, 286 169, 214, 408 103, 104, 207, 405, 409, 410 Kennet and Avon Canal Company v. Great Western Railway 2,80 54, 55 42, 237 .. 128 Kerridge v. Hessey Kidwelly Canal Company v. Raby Lake v. Duke of Argyle Lancaster Canal Navigation, Company of Proprietors of, v. Parnaby Lane v. Newdigate Lawrence v. Knowles Lee v. Milner Leeman v. Lloyd Lichfield, Mayor of, &c. v. Simpson PAGE 57 Limerick and Waterford Railway Company v. Fraser 46, 48 381, 383 London and Birmingham Railway Company v. Grand Junction Canal Company 88, 93, 367, 409 London and Birmingham Railway Company v. Winter 137, 138 London Bridge Act, in re London and Brighton Railway Company v. Blake.. 109, 110, 367, 407 London and Brighton Railway Company v. Cooper.. 106, 367 London and Brighton Railway Company v. Fairclough..251,255, 265, 266, 279, 281, 290, 295, 351, 353, 354, 359, 361, 362 London and Brighton Railway Company v. Wilson..239, 279, 353, 354 204, 226 London and Greenwich Railway Company, in re 139 London Grand Junction Railway Company v. Freeman.. 46, 282, 294, 358, 359 London Grand Junction Railway Company v. Graham 282, 358 London Grand Junction Railway Company v. Gunstone 282,358 Long . Yonge Lord Petre v. Eastern Counties Railway Company..58, 59, 117 Lovell v. Hicks Lucas v. Birmingham and Gloucester Railway Company.. 315 Madon, Exparte, in re Great Western Railway Company 231 .. 293, 373, 374 Manning v. Eastern Counties Railway Company.. 122, 193, 208, Manser v. Northern and Eastern Counties Railway Com. |