We do not see how a better test can be applied to the question whether reasonable or not, than by considering whether the restraint is such only as to afford a fair protection to the interests of the party in favor of whom it is given, and not so large... Precedents and Forms in Conveyancing - Page 526by Charles Davidson - 1864Full view - About this book
| New Jersey. Court of Chancery - 1887 - 812 lehte
...is only such as is necessary to afford a fair protection lo the interest of the party in whose favor it is given, and not so large as to interfere with the interest of the public. />•/, 185 8. A consideration, sufficient to support a contract, may be defined... | |
| New Jersey. Court of Chancery - 1893 - 690 lehte
...is only such as is necessary to afford a fair protection to the interest of the party in whose favor it is given, and not so large as to interfere with the interest of the public." Brewer v. Marshall, 4 CE Or. 587. See, also, reference to other cases to same... | |
| New Jersey. Court of Chancery - 1892 - 734 lehte
...valid, must be only such as is necessary to afford a fair protection to the party in ftvor of whom it is given, and not so large as to interfere with the interest of the public. This is the principle which controlled the decision in Mandeville v. Harman,... | |
| Great Britain. Court of Common Pleas, Peregrine Bingham - 1831 - 830 lehte
...restraint is such only as to afford a fair protection to the interests of the party in favour of whom it is given, and not so large as to interfere with...the law, unreasonable. Whatever is injurious to the interests of the public is void, on the grounds of public policy. In the case above referred to, Lord... | |
| Great Britain. Court of Common Pleas, John Bayly Moore, Joseph Payne - 1832 - 874 lehte
...restraint is such only as to afford a fair protection to the interests of the party in favour of whom it is given, and not so large as to interfere with...protection of the party can be of no benefit to either; it 1831. can only be oppressive; and, if oppressive, it is in the eye of the law unreasonable. Whatever... | |
| Great Britain. Court of King's Bench - 1837 - 886 lehte
...restraint is such only as to afford a fair protection to the interests of the party in favour of whom it is given, and not so large as to interfere with...oppressive, it is in the eye of the law unreasonable." That refers to the case of 1837. 1837. a party, having no interest in a trade, taking a bond from another... | |
| Great Britain. Court of Exchequer, Roger Meeson, William Newland Welsby - 1837 - 988 lehte
...restraint is such only as to afford & fair protection to the interests of the party in favour of whom it is given, and not so large as to interfere with the interests of the public. No certain precise boundary can be laid down, within which the restraint would be reasonable, and bevond... | |
| Francis Stack Murphy, Edwin Tyrrell Hurlstone, Great Britain. Court of Exchequer - 1838 - 416 lehte
...restraint is such only as to afford a fair protection to the interests of the party in favour of whom it is given, and not so large as to interfere with...the law, unreasonable. Whatever is injurious to the interests of the public is void on the grounds of public policy.1' In former times the judges spoke... | |
| Great Britain. Court of King's Bench, John Leycester Adolphus, Thomas Flower Ellis - 1838 - 1096 lehte
...favour of whom it is given, and again* Col.IV.. not so .large as to interfere with the interests or the public. Whatever restraint is larger than the...the law, unreasonable. Whatever is injurious to the interests of the public is void, on the grounds of public policy." It may indeed be said that all such... | |
| 1839 - 474 lehte
...should be coextensive only with the benefits meant to be enjoyed on the other."i And by Tindal, CJ : " Whatever restraint is larger than the necessary protection...oppressive, and if oppressive, it is in the eye of the law unreasonable."2 This principle is equally applicable to every other species of restraint, and is the... | |
| |