« EelmineJätka »
THE BOOK OF COMMON PRAYER,
AND ADMINISTRATION OF
RITES AND CEREMONIES OF THE CHURCH,
ACCORDING TO THE USE OF
THE PROTESTANT EPISOOPAL CHURCH
United States of America;
A GENERAL COMMENTARY,
HISTORICAL, EXPLANATORY, DOCTRINAL, AND PRACTICAL:
COMPILED FROM THE MOST APPROVED LITURGICAL WORKS, WITH ALTERATIONS AND ADDITIONS, AND
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Stereotype Edition Revised.
BY THOMAS CHURCH BROWNELL, D. D. LL.D.
BISHOP OF THE PROTESTANT EPISCOPAL CHURCH IN THE STATE OF CONNECTICUT.
Mia dénois, els väg 850.-Sr. IGNATIU8.
NO. 139, BROADWAY.
Southern District of New-York, ss. BE IT REMEMBERED, That on the twenty-sixth day of September. 1846, STANFORD AND Swords, of the said District, hath deposited at this Office the title of a book, the title of which is in the
a words following, to wit:
“The Family Prayer Book, or the Book of Common Prayer, and Administration of the Sacraments, and other Rites and Ceremonies of the Church, according to the use of the Protestant Episcopal Church in the United States of America, accompanied by a General Commentary, historical, explanatory, doctrinal, and practical: compiled from the most approved Liturgical works, with alterations and additions, and accommodated to the Liturgy of the Protestant Episcopal Church in the United States of America. Stereotype Edition Revised. By Thomas Church Brownell, D.D. LL.D., Bishop of the Protestant Episcopal Church in the State of Connecticut. Mía dénois els 'vis Esw. St. Ignatius.
The right whereof he claims as Proprietor. In conformity with an Act of Congress, entitled " An Act to amend the several Acts respecting copy-rights.”
CHARLES D. BETTS,
I do hereby certify that the edition of the Common Prayer Book, the Articles and Offices, to which this Commentary is attached, having been compared and corrected by the Standard Book, by a Presbyter appointed for the purpose, according to the Canon, is permitted to be published accordingly.
BENJAMIN T. ONDERDONK,
Bishop of the Diocese of New York. New York, June 26, 1841.
The considerations which have led to the publication of the following work, were stated at large in the Prospectus of the Editor. Some of the leading ones may properly be recapitulated in this place. It is well known that the Scholars and Divines of the Church of England have expended much labour in the elucidation of her Book of Common Prayer. The history of its several Offices has been investigated, and their import fully explained; the system of doctrines it inculcates has been successfully defended and established ; and the whole has been commended to the judgment, and enforced upon the conscience and the heart, by the most earnest practical appeals. But the works of these writers on the Liturgy are diffused through a great number of volumes. Some of them have become, in a measure, obsolete in their style, and some of the most valuable of them are hardly to be obtained, even in England ; while no complete work on the Liturgy has yet been issued from any American Press. The result is, that those among us who wish to profit by such works, can only gratify their inclinations at great expense, and with much difficulty ; while a very large portion of the members of our Church remain but imperfectly instructed in the full import of those services which constitute the formulary of her worship, and the ritual for the administration of her sacraments.
A judicious compilation from the works of the best English writers on the Liturgy ; so comprehensive as to contain all that is most interesting and useful, and yet at so moderate a price that it may be brought into general use, seems greatly to be needed by our Church; and it has been the object and endeavour of the Editor to supply this desideratum.
In the prosecution of his work, he has thought it expedient to present the Commentary on the Morning and Evening Prayers of the Church, mostly in his own language, and somewhat at large; condensing what has been said by many writers into single articles, attached to each particular part of the service. As this portion of the work will probably be most frequently read in a devotional way, such an arrangement was thought convenient, to preserve the connexion, and to prevent those interruptions which must otherwise occur in passing from the observations of one writer to those of another. But in most other