is judicial authority so ancient as 1820 [Goodman v. Sayers, Jacob & Walker's Cases in Chancery, vol. 2] for saying "that the very definition of a good award is that it gives dissatisfaction to both parties." In the following pages I have endeavoured to lay before the Profession the decisions in England, New South Wales and Victoria, and I hope while this book may prove useful that the Arbitration Act will be generally availed of in suitable cases. CHAMBERS, 12 Wentworth Court, May, 1893. Sydney. JAMES MORIARTY. ALPHABETICAL LIST OF CASES CITED. Arbuckle v. Price, 4 Dowl. 174 A. Armstrong and Culley, In re, 4 V.L.R. (L) 178 B. Bailey v. Harb, 9 V.L.R. (L.) 322 Banks v. Banks, 1 Gale 46 Baker v. Townsend, 1 Moore 120 Bagaley v. Borthwick, 10 C.B.N.S. 64 Batty, In re, 1 E. & B. 787 Beddow v. Beddow, 5 H.L.C. 89, 9 Ch. D. 89 Beck v. Jackson, 1 C.B.N.S. 695 Birmingham and Staffordshire Gas Co. v. Ratcliffe, L.R. 6 Ex. 224, 40 L.J. Ex. 136 Blennerhassett v. Day, 2 Ball & Beatty 116 Blanchard v. Sun Fire Office, 6 Times Law R. 365 Bowker v. Evans, 15 Q.B.D. 565 Bradley v. Phelps, 6 Ex. 97 Brooker v. McPherson (Cudmore v. Same), 8 V.L.R. (L.) 154 Bottomley v. Amber, 38 LT. N.S. 545 Booth v. Davis, 3 A. & E. 200 Brumsden v. Stains Local Board, 1 C. & E. 272 Bury v. Dunn, 1 D. & L. 141 C. Campbell v. Vickery, 6 N.S.W.R. 209 Caerleon Tin Plate Company v. Hughes and Another, 65 L.T. 115, 7 Times Law R. Carlisle, In re, Clegg v. Clegg, L.R. 44, Ch. D. 200 Chappell v. North, 2 Q.B.D. 232 Christie v. Noble, 14 L.R. Ch. D. 203 Clout v. Metropolitan Railway Co., 46 L.T. 141 Curzey v. Aitcheson, 2 B. & C.K. B.R. 170 Cook v. Catchpole, 34 L.J. Ch. 60 Coxhead v. Mullis, 3 C.P.D. 439 Collins v. Locke, L.R. 4 App. Cases 674 Crampton and Holt v. Ridley & Co., L.R. 20 Q.B.D. 48 Compagnie du Senegal v. Woods & Co., 53 L.J. N.S. (Ch.) 166 Crossley v. Clay, 5 C.B. 581 viii. ALPHABETICAL LIST OF CASES CITED. D. Dawson ». Fitzgerald, L.R. 1 Q.B.D. Davis v. Starr, L.R. 41 Ch. D. 242 Deane v. Nicol and Another, 6 N.S.W. L.R. 145 Deutsche Springsteffe Gesellshaft v. Briscoe, L.R. 20 Q.B.D. East and West Indian Dock Co., Appellants; Kirk and Randell, Respondents, L.R. 12 Appeal Cases 738 Ebbett's Case, 5 L.R. Ch. 202 Ebsworth v. Hickey, 1 S.C.R. 334 Edwards v. Davies, 23 L.J. Q.B. Elliott v. South Devon Railway Co., 2 De Gex & S. 17 F. Farrell v. Eastern Counties Railway Co., 2 Ex. 344 Fearn and Flynn, L.R. 5 C.P. 34 G. Gaffney v. Killen, 12 Ir. C.L.R. App. 25 Gale v. Wingello Mining Co., Ltd., 11 S.C.R. 79 Gillett v. Thornton, 19 Equity 604 Gladwin v. Chillcote, 9 Dowl. 550 Goldsbrough and Co. v. McMahon, 8 N.S.W. L.R. 119 H. Haigh v. Haigh, 3 De G. F. & I. 157 Harvey v. Shelton, 7 Beav. 455, 13 L.J. Ch. 466 Hagger v. Baker, 14 M. & W. 9 Hart v. Duke, 32 L.J. Q.B. 55 Henery v. Henery, Batty 125 Hersh v. Irn Thurn, 4 C.B. N.S. 569 Hickie v. Q. S. I. Co., 4 S.C.R. 161 Hodgkinson v. Fernie and Another, 3 C.P. (N.S.) 201, 27 L.J. C.P. 66 Hoggins v. Gordon, 3 Q.B. 466 Hodgson v. Passenger Railway Co., L.R. 9 Q.B.D. 191 Hock v. Boor, 49 L.J. C.L. 665 Hutchinson v. Whitfield, Hayes (Ir. Ex.) 78 Hutchinson v. Easton, 13 Q.B.D. 867 Huntley, In re, 1 E. & B. 787 James v. James and Bendall, L.R. 23 Q.B.D. 12 K. Kimberley v. Dick, L.R. 13 Eq. 1 Kirk v. East and West India Dock Company, 12 L.R. H.L. 738 (1887). Law v. Garrett, 8 Ch. D. 26 Lewis, In re, 1 Q.B.D. 724 L. Lewis v. Rossiter, 44 L.J. Ex. 136 Little v. Newton, 2 M. & G. 351 Livingston v. Ralli, 24 L.J. (N.S.) Q.B. 269 Ludbrook v. Barrett, 46 L.J. C.P. 798 M. Mason v. Haddon, 6 C.B.R. (N.S.) 526 Maunsell v. Ainsworth, 8 Dowling 869 Marsh v. Wood, 9 B. & C. 659 Malmesbury Ry. Co. v. Budd, L.R. 2 Ch. D. 113 Marshall v. Dresser, 3 Q.B. 875 Metcalfe v. Ives, 1 Atk. 63 Meeker and Brown, In re, 1 S.C.R. N.S. 59 Mitchell v. Harris, 2 Ves. Jn. 129 Milnes v. Robinson, 24 L.J. Ex. 179 McGillivray v. Bibby, 9 W.N. 51 Morell v. Dixon, 6 N.S.W. L.R. 145 McSharry v. Comr. of Railways, 11 N.S.W. L.R. 459 Morgan v. Mather, 2 Ves. Jr. 15 Moseley v. Simpson, 16 Eq. 226 Musgrave v. Stevens, W.N. (1881) 163 X. ALPHABETICAL LIST OF CASES CITED. P. Pappa v. Rose, L.R. 7 C.P., 41 L.J. C.P. 187 Percival and Others, In re, 3 Times L.R. 150 Piercy v. Young, L.R. 14 Ch. D. 200 Phipps v. Ingram, 3 Dowl. 669 Pickering v. Cape Town Railway Co., L.R. 1 Eq. 84 Plews v. Baker, 16 Equity 564 Poole v. Dixon and Others, 6 N.S.W. L.R. 145 Port Jackson Steamship Co. v. Newcastle Steamship Co., 1 W.N. 62 R. R. v. Veemes, C.C. Reserved, 1891, 2 Q.B.D. V. 1, 360 Rouse and Neier, In re, L.R. C.P. 212, 45 L.J. C.P. 106 Russell v. Russell, L.R. 14 Ch. D. 471 S. Sahl v. MacDonnell, 7 L.R. 385, 3 W.N. 115 Sacker v. Ragozine, 44 L.T. 308 Samuel v. Cooper, 2 A. & E. 752 Scoles v. East London Waterworks, 1 Hodges 91 Scott v. Van Sandan, 1 Q.B. 102 Smith & Service, and Nelson & Sons, In re, L.R. 25 Q.B.D. Strachan v. Dougall, 7 M.P.C. 365 Straus v. Francis, L.R. Q.B. 379 Sturgis and Another v. Lord Curzon, 21 L.J. Ex. 38 Stevenson v. Watson, L.R. 4 C.P.D. 148 Suttor v. Moore, 6 N.S.W.R. 207 Swinfen v. Swinfen, 25 L.J. C.P. 29 Tharsis Sulphur and Copper Co., Ltd., v. Loftus, L. R. 8 C.P. 1 Thomas v. Atherton, L.R. 10 Ch. D. 185 Tomkins v. Cunningham, 9 V.L.R. (E.) 142 Turner v. Goulden, L. R. 9 C.P. 57 |