Reports of Cases Argued and Adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, 14. köidePublished for John Conrad and Company, 1853 |
From inside the book
Results 6-10 of 100
Page 27
United States. Supreme Court. Brown et al : v . Aspden et al . entered , unless some member of the court who concurred in the judgment afterwards doubts the correctness of his opinion , and desires a further argument on the subject . And ...
United States. Supreme Court. Brown et al : v . Aspden et al . entered , unless some member of the court who concurred in the judgment afterwards doubts the correctness of his opinion , and desires a further argument on the subject . And ...
Page 29
United States. Supreme Court. Hagan v . Walker et al . JOHN HAGAN , SURVIVING PARTNER OF THE LATE FIRM OF JOHN HAGAN & Co. , APPELLANT , v . LEROY P. WALKER , ADMI ... et Hammekin et ux v Hoyt et Hardeman et al Harris Hardeman et Christy.
United States. Supreme Court. Hagan v . Walker et al . JOHN HAGAN , SURVIVING PARTNER OF THE LATE FIRM OF JOHN HAGAN & Co. , APPELLANT , v . LEROY P. WALKER , ADMI ... et Hammekin et ux v Hoyt et Hardeman et al Harris Hardeman et Christy.
Page 149
United States. Supreme Court. Lawler et al . v . Walker et al . DAVIS B. LAWLER , TIMOTHY WALKER , STEPHEN S. L'HOMME ... al . 13 DECEMBER TERM , 1852 . 149 Lawler et al v Walker et.
United States. Supreme Court. Lawler et al . v . Walker et al . DAVIS B. LAWLER , TIMOTHY WALKER , STEPHEN S. L'HOMME ... al . 13 DECEMBER TERM , 1852 . 149 Lawler et al v Walker et.
Page 156
United States. Supreme Court. Le Roy et al . v . Tatham et al . THOMAS OTIS LE ROY , AND DAVID SMITH , PLAINTIFFS IN ER- ROR , V. BENJAMIN TATHAM , JUNIOR , GEORGE N. TATHAM , AND HENRY B ... et al 156 SUPREME COURT . Le Roy et al v Tatham ...
United States. Supreme Court. Le Roy et al . v . Tatham et al . THOMAS OTIS LE ROY , AND DAVID SMITH , PLAINTIFFS IN ER- ROR , V. BENJAMIN TATHAM , JUNIOR , GEORGE N. TATHAM , AND HENRY B ... et al 156 SUPREME COURT . Le Roy et al v Tatham ...
Page 161
United States. Supreme Court. Le Roy et al . v . Tatham et al . mould , and after it was set by the application of water , forcing it out . And the question is , whether any of these inventions are sub- stantially the same as the ...
United States. Supreme Court. Le Roy et al . v . Tatham et al . mould , and after it was set by the application of water , forcing it out . And the question is , whether any of these inventions are sub- stantially the same as the ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
act of Congress action adjudged administrator admitted affirmed aforesaid agreement alleged appears appellants appellees applied assignment authority aver bank bending lever bill Bimeler Burden cause certificate chancery charge Circuit Court citizen claim collision Commissioner Company complainants constitution construction contract Court of Chancery court of equity creditors debt decision declared decree defendant in error delivered the opinion District Court dollars entitled equity evidence execution fact filed Fourniquet frontier leagues Goesele grant habeas corpus heirs hereby Hicks issued John Judge judgment jurisdiction jury Justice Kaine Kosciusko land liable lien Louisiana machine marshal ment Mississippi owner parties patent payment person plaintiff in error plea pleaded possession principle proceedings purchaser question received record Republic of Texas rule spike statute suit Supreme Court Tatham term testator Texas thereof tion treaty trustee United valid vested Vincennes University void writ of error
Popular passages
Page 275 - The governor and judges, or a majority of them, shall adopt and publish in the district, such laws of the original States, criminal and civil, as may be necessary, and best suited to the circumstances of the district...
Page 514 - ... at a greater distance than one hundred miles from the place of holding the same without the permission of the trial court being first had upon proper application and cause shown.
Page 233 - Wisconsin, which are not repugnant to this constitution, shall remain in force until they expire by their own limitation, or be altered or repealed by the legislature.
Page 132 - The writ of habeas corpus shall in no case extend to a prisoner in jail, unless where he is in custody under or by color of the authority of the United States...
Page 143 - ... upon such evidence of criminality as, according to the laws of the place where the fugitive or person so charged shall be found, would justify his apprehension and commitment for trial if the crime or offence had there been committed...
Page 20 - Every citizen of the United States is also a citizen of a state or territory. He may be said to owe allegiance to two sovereigns, and may be liable to punishment for an infraction of the laws of either. The same act may be an offense or transgression of the laws of both.
Page 507 - On consideration whereof, it is now here ordered and adjudged by this court, that the judgment of the said circuit court in this cause be and the same is hereby reversed...
Page 76 - This cause came on to be heard on the transcript of the record from the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Maryland, and was argued by counsel. On consideration whereof, it is now here ordered, adjudged, and decreed by this Court, that the...
Page 192 - On consideration whereof, it is now here ordered, adjudged, and decreed by this court, that the decree of the said...
Page 47 - All questions relative to the government of foreign nations, whether of the old or new world, have been treated by the United States as questions of fact only, and our predecessors have cautiously abstained from deciding upon them until the clearest evidence was in their possession, to enable them not only to decide correctly, but to shield their decisions from every unworthy imputation.