Reports of Cases Argued and Determined in the Supreme Court of the State of Vermont: Reported by the Judges of Said Court, Agreeably to a Statute Law of the State, 28. köide |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 100
Page 17
... hands , its effect will be , not to destroy the lien of the creditor , but to subject the officer to a liability in an action on the case for such damages as the party injured has actually sustained . In the case of Pierson v . Gale , 8 ...
... hands , its effect will be , not to destroy the lien of the creditor , but to subject the officer to a liability in an action on the case for such damages as the party injured has actually sustained . In the case of Pierson v . Gale , 8 ...
Page 67
... hands belonging to the defendant , he should have applied it on these debts , not only to pay his part of the suretyship , but Whip- ple's also , unless he could show that he had other individual claims or liabilities on which , in ...
... hands belonging to the defendant , he should have applied it on these debts , not only to pay his part of the suretyship , but Whip- ple's also , unless he could show that he had other individual claims or liabilities on which , in ...
Page 68
... and still held in his hands moneys received from such securities sufficient to pay all his liabilities for Briggs , and all he had paid for Briggs , Whipple & Jones v . Briggs . together with the 68 CHITTENDEN COUNTY .
... and still held in his hands moneys received from such securities sufficient to pay all his liabilities for Briggs , and all he had paid for Briggs , Whipple & Jones v . Briggs . together with the 68 CHITTENDEN COUNTY .
Page 69
... hands to pay all the liabilities he is under for him , and the whole of this debt also , Whipple might also maintain an action against Jones at the same time . If the defendant is cor- rect , then if Jones is insolvent , Whipple must ...
... hands to pay all the liabilities he is under for him , and the whole of this debt also , Whipple might also maintain an action against Jones at the same time . If the defendant is cor- rect , then if Jones is insolvent , Whipple must ...
Page 70
... hands , except about the sum of eighty dollars ; and it does not appear that Jones has paid at any time , for the use of Briggs , any moneys except the sum of seven hundred and fifty dollars to take up the notes of Briggs to the banks ...
... hands , except about the sum of eighty dollars ; and it does not appear that Jones has paid at any time , for the use of Briggs , any moneys except the sum of seven hundred and fifty dollars to take up the notes of Briggs to the banks ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
action Admr adverse possession affirmed aforesaid agreement allowed amount appeared applied arbitrators assignment ASSUMPSIT attachment auditor award Bank bill Briggs chancery charge choses in action circuit session claim commenced contract county court court of chancery court of equity court was delivered creditors damages debt debtor deceased declaration decree deed defendant defendant's delivered by REDFIELD dollars entitled equity excepted execution fact favor fendant fraud guaranty held intestate judgment jurisdiction jury justice land liable lien ment mortgage Nichols notice officer opinion owner paid parties payment Peck person plaintiff plea possession premises principal probate court purchase purpose question railroad real estate recover reference regard rendered residence road settlement statute statute of frauds statute of limitations sufficient suit surety sustained taxes tending to prove Term testimony tion town trial trial by jury trustee Vermont Central Railroad widow wife writ
Popular passages
Page 191 - This opinion does not deprive the states of any resources which they originally possessed. It does not extend to a tax paid by the real property of the bank, in common with the other real property within the state, nor to a tax imposed on the interest which the citizens of Maryland may hold in this institution, in common with other property of the same description throughout the state.
Page 82 - ... all, and all manner of action and actions, cause and causes of action, suits, debts, dues, sums of money, accounts, reckonings...
Page 62 - ... that from the mere relation of master and servant no contract, and therefore no duty, can be implied on the part of the master to cause the servant to be safely and securely carried, or to make the master liable for damage to the servant, arising from any vice or imperfection, unknown to the master, in the carriage, or in the mode of loading and conducting it.
Page 325 - Had you called the porter and he had said that, although he had no recollection of the letter in question, he invariably carried to the post office all the letters found upon the table, this might have done...
Page 591 - ... where the proceedings are not according to the course of the common law, nor inrolled , such as the county-court, courts of hundreds, court-baron, &c.
Page 185 - CP 612, is in point in a case of this kind, viz., that he "could see no difference between negligence and gross negligence; that it was the same thing with the addition of a vituperative epithet.
Page 265 - In consideration whereof the said party of the second part covenants and agrees to and with the said party of the first part to...
Page 363 - ... the agreement is one which by the statute of frauds is required to be in writing.
Page 54 - ... proprietor of the land has a right to the advantage of the stream flowing in its natural course over his land, to use the same as he pleases, for any purposes of his own, not inconsistent with a similar right in the proprietors of the land above or below; so that, neither can any proprietor above diminish the quantity or injure the quality of the water which would otherwise naturally descend, nor can any proprietor below throw back the water without the license or the grant of the proprietor...
Page 502 - In such a case there is no room for any other appropriation than that which arises from the order in which the receipts and payments take place, and are carried into the account. Presumably it is the sum first paid in that is first drawn out. It is the first item on the debit side of the account that is discharged or reduced by the first item on the credit side. The appropriation is made by the very act of setting the two items against each other.