 | Brian MacArthur - 1995 - 536 lehte
[ Sorry, this page's content is restricted ] | |
 | Lewis Copeland, Lawrence W. Lamm, Stephen J. McKenna - 1999 - 978 lehte
...equal right in the land, as it was at first, and should he yet; for it never was divided, but helongs to all for the use of each. That no part has a right...land from the Indians, because they had it first; it is theirs. They may sell, but all must join. Any sale not made by all is not valid. The late sale is... | |
 | Paula M. Marks - 1999 - 494 lehte
[ Sorry, this page's content is restricted ] | |
 | Joshua David Bellin - 2001 - 294 lehte
...Great Spirit intended [the land] as the common property of all the tribes" and thus that "no tribe has a right to sell, even to each other, much less to strangers, who demand all," Indians challenged not only the nation's claim but the notion that any claim, physical... | |
 | Samuel Gardner Drake - 2001 - 469 lehte
...the red men to unite in claiming a common and equal right in the land, as it was at first, and should be yet; for it never was divided, but belongs to all,...land from the Indians, because they had it first; it is theirs. They may sell, but all must join. Any sale not made by all is not valid. The late sale is... | |
 | Jace Weaver - 2001 - 412 lehte
...land, as it was at first, and should be now — for it never was divided, but belongs to all. No tribe has a right to sell, even to each other, much less to strangers, who demand all and will take no less."78 This raises the ultimate question of ownership of land; namely,... | |
| |
The way, and the only way, to check and to stop this evil, is for all the red men to unite in claiming a common and equal right in the land, as it was at first, and should be yet; for it never was divided, but belongs to all for the use of each. That... 
