...judging from the outline given by Busk,J it quite justifies Huxley's § remark that, " It is in fact a fair average human skull, which might have belonged...contained the thoughtless brains of a savage." The form of this skull and the pottery found in the same stratum, point to its being of later date than...

...also says of it : " There is no mark of degradation about any part of its structure. It is, in fact, a fair average human skull, which might have belonged...or might have contained the thoughtless brains of a savage."f The earliest men in Europe were therefore as well provided with brains as are the modern...

...also says of it: " There is no mark of degradation about any part of its structure. It is, in fact, a fair average human skull, which might have belonged...or might have contained the thoughtless brains of a savage."f The earliest men in Europe were therefore as well provided with brains as are the modern...

...Ethiopian rather than to that of a European." It was of this specimen that Huxley said, " It is, in fact, a fair average human skull, which might have belonged...have contained the thoughtless brains of a savage." Thus at a very early date there was evolved a type of skull intermediate to the Galley Hill and riverbed...

...man 32. "The Engis skull, perhaps the oldest known" is, according to Prof. Huxley, " a fair average skull, which might have belonged to a philosopher,...have contained the thoughtless brains of a savage." Speaking of the oldest known skulls, Wallace says: " But what is still more extraordinary, the few...

...Huxley made about the ancient human skull from the cave of Engis still holds good of the brain : " It might have belonged to a philosopher or might have contained the thoughtless mind of a savage." That is only one side of our problem ; there is another side. Huxley's statement...

...as that of the much sought ' ' missing link, ' ' was conceded by Prof. Huxley to be " a fair average skull, which might have belonged to a philosopher, or might have contained the thoughtless brain of a savage." This Engis skull is supposed to be the oldest known up to now. Again quoting Prof....

...Place in Nature," " There is no mark of degradation about any part of its structure. It is, in fact, a fair average human skull, 'which might have belonged...have contained the thoughtless brains of a savage." Sir J. Lubbock says " it might have been that of a modern European, so far, at least, as form is concerned."...

...evolutionary history. These were limited to Engis (the adult specimen, which he correctly identified as a "fair average human skull, which might have belonged...have contained the thoughtless brains of a savage") and Neanderthal. He was impressed by the distinctiveness of the Neanderthal skullcap, but he concluded,...

...skulls. And assuredly, there is no mark of degradation about any part of its structure. It is, in fact, a fair average human skull, which might have belonged...contained the thoughtless brains of a savage. The case of the Neanderthal skull is very different. Under whatever aspect we view this cranium, whether...