 | Frederick Pollock - 1897 - 712 lehte
...which had been supposed to be impugned. This was done in Metropolitan Railway Company v. Jackson («). "The judge has a certain duty to discharge, and the...from those facts, when submitted to them, negligence ouyht to be inferred. It is, in my opinion, of the greatest importance in the administration of justice... | |
 | John Pitt Taylor - 1897 - 840 lehte
...the Metropol. Ey. Co. v. Jackson, 1877, Ld. Cairns, C., in HL, thus explained these principles: — " The judge has to say whether any facts have been established...from those facts, when submitted to them, negligence our/lit to be inferred. It is, in my opinion, of the greatest importance in the administration of justice... | |
 | Norman Fetter - 1897 - 888 lehte
...should not be encouraged.'' McCormick, J., in New Orleans & NER Co. v. Thomas, 9 CCA 29, 60 Fed. 379. ii "The judge has to say whether any facts have been...negligence may be reasonably inferred; the jurors have to sny whether, from those facts, when submitted to them, negligence ought to be inferred. It is, in my... | |
 | 1891 - 1120 lehte
...nonsuit'1 Willard J., in People v. Cook, 8 NY, 67, 74. "The judge has a certain duty to discharge, and jurors have another and a different duty. The judge...established by evidence, from which negligence may reasonably be inferred ; the jurors have to say whether, from those facts, negligence ought to be inferred."... | |
 | 1897 - 1016 lehte
...language of the court in the case of Bridges v. Tlie North London Railway Company, LR 7 HL 213, said : " The judge has a certain duty to discharge and the...reasonably inferred ; the jurors have to say whether, from these facts, when submitted to them, negligence ought to oe inferred. It is, in my opinion, of the... | |
 | 1899 - 908 lehte
...evidence from which negligence can be reasonably and legitimately inferred, and it is for the jury to say whether from those facts, when submitted to them, negligence ought to be inferred. In Wheatley v. Railroad Co., 1 Marv. 315, 38 Atl. 661, the court said: "Where the evidence on the part... | |
 | 1899 - 634 lehte
...ascertained, it is the duty of the Court to declare the law thereon. Baker p. Fehr, 97 Pa. 70. The Judge must say whether any facts have been established by evidence from which negligence may reasonably be inferred. Phila. & Reading RR u. Hell, 5 WEEKLY NOTES, 91. March 20, 1899. MITCHELL,... | |
 | Frederick Pollock - 1901 - 716 lehte
...and a different duty. The judge r"-v- has to say whether any facts have been established Jackson. JJ by evidence from which negligence may be reasonably...from those facts, when submitted to them, negligence oiu,Tht to be inferred. It is, in my opinion, of the greatest importance in the administration of justice... | |
 | Frank Farnum Dresser - 1902 - 906 lehte
...drawn from them are uncertain, and might fairly lead different minds to different conclusions."158 "The judge has to say whether any facts have been...reasonably inferred. The jurors have to say whether i08 McGhee v. Campbell (CCA) 101 Fed. 936, 940. "If the evidence, in the most favorable light in which... | |
 | 1902 - 1040 lehte
...defendant ought to have taken. See Hayes v. Michinan CR Co. Ill US 228 28' L. ed. 410. 4 Sup. Ct. Rep. 300. "The judge has a certain duty to discharge, and the jurors have another and different duty. The judge has to sny whether any facts have, been established by evidence from which... | |
| |
The judge has to say whether any facts have been established by evidence from which negligence may be reasonably inferred ; the jurors have to say whether, from those facts when submitted to them, negligence ought to be inferred. 
