...Exchequer Chamber in 1865 (/), in these terms: — " There must be reasonable evidence of negligence. " But where the thing is shown to be under the management...reasonable evidence, in the absence of explanation by the defendants, that the accident arose from want of (e) Carpue v. London $ Brighton $ SCR Co. (1850) 5...

...reasonable evidence of negligence, but where the thing (meaning the thing which caused the injury) isshown to be under the management of the defendant or his...use proper care, it affords reasonable evidence, in the absense of explanation by the defendant, and that the accident arose from want of care." In the...

...point. Pollock On Torts, No. 363. " Thére must bo reasonable " evidence of negligence. But, whén the thing is shown " to be under the management of the defendant, or his ser" vants, and the accident is such as, in the ordinary course " of things, does not happen if those...

...Colt. 596, the doctrine was thus laid down: "There must « some reasonable evidence of negligence. But where the thing is shown to be under the management...use proper care, it affords reasonable evidence, in the absence of explanation, that the accident arose from want of care." See also Priggs v. Oliver,...

...There *«iu3tbe reasonable evidence of negligence. •Bat, «hen the thing is shown to be under "lie management of the defendant or his "servants, and...use " proper care, it affords reasonable evidence, *m the absence of explanation by the de" tendant, that the accident arose from want •of care." On...

...plaintiff. 1 This principle Avas thus formulated by Mr. Chief Justice ERLE in the following language: "Where the thing is shown to be under the management...defendant or his servants, and the accident is such as, under an ordinary course of things, does not happen if those who have the management use proper care,...

...defendant or his servants, and the accident is such as, under an ordinary course of things, does not happen if those who have the management use proper care,...reasonable evidence, in the absence of explanation by the defendants, that the accident arose from want of care. ' " The principle is of special application...

...or his servants, and the accident is such as, under an ordinary course of things, does not happen, if those who have the management use proper care, it affords reasonable evidence, in the absence of explananation by the defendant, that the accident arose from want of care." The argument...

...Colt. 596, the doctrine was thus laid down: "There must be some reasonable evidence of negligence. But where the thing is shown to be under the management of the de16 C. of L. — 29 fendant or his servants, and the accident is such as in the ordinary course of...

...thus laid down: "There must besóme reasonable evidence of negligence. But where the thing is shown lo be under the management of the defendant or his servants,...use proper care, it affords reasonable evidence, in the absence of explanation, that the accident arose from want of care." See also Priggs v. Oliver,...